Uber to Repay Millions After Stiffing NYC Drivers for Years

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Uber has messed up — again. The ride-hailing company admitted to shortchanging New York City drivers to the tune of tens of millions of dollars due to miscalculated payments. It’s the second time Uber has been caught mishandling payroll, with the latest fiasco resembling Richard Pryor’s banking scheme from Superman III.

In its agreement with drivers, Uber is supposed to calculate its own percentage after taxes and other fees. However, it ended up calculating its New York commissions on total cost, including those expenditures. This has resulted in NY-based drivers receiving slightly lower fares ever since the November 2014 agreement. It doesn’t amount to much per fare but, when compounded by several thousand drivers and a handful of years, it adds up to millions. Regardless of how unintentional the error may or may not have been, the affected drivers are incredibly displeased.

In a media release, the Independent Drivers Guild expressed its anger over Uber’s inability to compensate its contractors as agreed — taking aim not just at the industry giant, but its competitors, too.

“Uber’s theft of drivers’ hard-earned wages is the latest in a long history of underhanded tactics in this industry. Year after year, companies like Uber, Lyft, Juno and Gett become more valuable and year after year they find new ways to take advantage of hard-working drivers. This is exactly why we have been calling for industry-wide pay protections to stop the exploitation of New York’s drivers once and for all,” said IDG founder Jim Conigliaro Jr.

“Drivers keep our city moving and we are asking customers and drivers alike to sign on to our petition for basic pay protections in an industry that has run amok.”

I’ve noticed Uber drivers in NYC souring on the company over the last few years, too. Employees who once praised the company for giving them options have soured on the subject as of late, and this is a big reason why.

The guild has called upon regulators to launch an immediate investigation into the fare and payment practices of all ride-hailing applications. It also reached out to the city’s Taxi and Limousine Commission to create industry-wide rules to protect driver pay.

In January, Uber paid $20 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission after admitting it exaggerated how much drivers could earn through the platform. Philadelphia drivers also received fare-based refunds earlier this year.

Uber has claimed it noticed the payroll error when it began creating more elaborate receipts for drivers. It plans to refund the missing wages. That sum should yield average drivers $900 each, though The Wall Street Journal estimated it would translate into a total expenditure of at least $45 million from Uber.

Drivers working for the company were issued an email today with the amount they are owed. Uber claims the funds should deposited into their accounts within a week’s time. Other drivers who have abandoned the company but may still be owed compensation are asked to reach out to the business to ensure they also receive payment.

“We are committed to paying every driver every penny they are owed — plus interest — as quickly as possible,” Rachel Holt, the company’s regional general manager for North America, said in a statement.

[Image: Jason Tester/ Flickr ( CC BY-ND 2.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • RHD RHD on May 24, 2017

    This is like getting charged sales tax on shipping charges on Ebay, and sales tax on the deposit on a case of soda. (Both have happened to me, and both are not legal.) Somehow the error just conveniently happens to be in the favor of the seller, not the consumer. Funny how it works that way.

  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on May 25, 2017

    I'm not a fan of Uber's business practices, but... "Uber has claimed it noticed the payroll error when it began creating more elaborate receipts for drivers." So did Uber find the error, admit it, and willingly agree to pay the drivers back? Or did the drivers finally get better receipts and demand repayment? If Uber did it voluntarily, then kudos to them for owning up to it. If the drivers had to ask, then shame on Uber. I can't find evidence either way in the article. "Other drivers who have abandoned the company but may still be owed compensation are asked to reach out to the business to ensure they also receive payment." No, it should be on Uber to ensure they receive payment, but former drivers should "Trust, but verify."

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next