Junkyard Find: 2000 Oldsmobile Intrigue GLS, Phoenix Open Edition

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Oldsmobile Division had just six years to live when the Intrigue appeared in the 1998 model year, and this car was Oldsmobile’s final version of the long-lived GM W platform. I see thousands of W-bodies every year, during my junkyard travels, but it takes a special one to make me reach for my camera. Say, a supercharged Daytona 500 Edition Grand Prix, or a Lumina Euro, or a genuine Phoenix Open-badged Intrigue.

Here’s an example of the latter car that I found languishing in a Phoenix wrecking yard, just 30 miles from the Phoenix Open’s high-zoot venue.

I couldn’t find much information about the Phoenix Open Intrigues, other than that Oldsmobile was the sponsor of the tournament in 2000. My guess is that GM provided a brace of Olds vehicles for officials and VIPs to drive during the event. These badges look classy.

The car also has these little decals atop the pinstripes.

The standard engine in the 2000 Intrigue was the “Shortstar” DOHC V6, loosely based on the Northstar V8. It was good for 215 horsepower, which made the 3,455-pound Intrigue move acceptably well.

This car is a top-trim-level GLS model, which came with leather seats and other luxuries demanded by pro golfers in the year 2000.

I couldn’t get a mileage figure from the digital odometer, but the front seats are sufficiently beat to suggest that this car went around the block more than a few times.

“Start to command performance. Start something.”

Nothing down! Low payments!







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Apr 25, 2017

    These were decent W-Body cars but by the time these as well as the Aurora were out Olds was trying to be GM's Infiniti or Lexus. Personally I prefer the Buick Regal GS or Pontiac Grand Prix with the far more durable 3800SC. A little praise for the Church of 3800. The grill less look of these later Oldsmobiles gave me the impression GM might merge the similar styling themed Saturn's in the model line. It might have saved both divisions.

  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Apr 25, 2017

    I just bought another Oldsmobile from Copart in Kansas City: A 2002 Intrigue GLS (Tropic Teal - code 37) with 56,000 miles for $700. It had right front fender damage (looked terrible but I bought a replacement fender at Pick-a-Part for $24) Now it is showroom perfect, runs fantastic and I kept it from the wrecking yard for pure insurance company reasons. The two-tone interior in mint condition is an added bonus!

    • Joeaverage Joeaverage on May 07, 2017

      Anybody that says you can't drive for cheap in 2017 isn't trying very hard.

  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
  • SCE to AUX Unresolved safety issues are a good reason to strike.
Next