Chevrolet Corvette May Get Active Aerodynamics System, Patents Reveal

Sam McEachern
by Sam McEachern

General Motors has filed a patent application for an innovative active aerodynamics system that may find its way into forthcoming C7 Corvette variant.

The application is for a “vehicle ride-height determination,” system that will adjust the vehicle’s active aerodynamic components “based on changes to the body relative to the center of the wheels.” It will also account for tire deflection, adjusting the active aero based on the load applied to the tires.

The controller is programmed with a look-up table establishing a correlation between the detected height of the vehicle body relative to the road wheel and the deflection of the tire, and wherein the controller is configured to determine the deflection of the tire using the look-up table.

A variety of active aero pieces are outlined in the patent drawings, including a front splitter, hood vents, a rear wing and grille shutters. It’s not clear if all these will be used in the potential production application of the system, or if GM is simply covering the bases with the patent and outlining every applicable component.

GM’s system differs from regular active aero in that it will attempt to compensate for any performance left on the table by the suspension becoming upset or the tires receiving too much load. Many other active aero systems will only adjust the position of the wings and shutters based on the speed of the vehicle or based on the application of the throttle and brake, but this version is much more sophisticated.

A pair of C7 Corvette ZR1 prototypes were recently filmed pounding around Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, but we couldn’t spot any active aero pieces upon viewing the video. It’s possible Chevy is playing its cards close to its chest and purposely hiding the active aero system on the ZR1, or perhaps we won’t see it in a production application for quite some time. GM sure isn’t letting any more info slip out, with head of communications for Chevy performance cars Ron Kiino telling GMInsideNews there’s “no comment” from the automaker at this time.

Sam McEachern
Sam McEachern

More by Sam McEachern

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Mar 25, 2017

    Amazing technology that brings amazing performance on the track, but for road use we are long past the point of relevance. How many people take their Vette (or other performance car) past .7g, do the 0-60 run in less than 7-8 seconds, or exceed 100 mph on the street? I'm guessing virtually none, and Vettes could pull those numbers or better 60 years ago on skinny tires, zero aero aids, and $4,000 sticker prices.

    • Tosh Tosh on Mar 26, 2017

      $4000 in 1957 has the same buying power as $35000 today in 2017.

  • El scotto El scotto on Mar 26, 2017

    This technology will be exclusive to the Corvette for the 1st 5-6 years. In year 6 this technology will appear on the Camaro with the Corvette engine and that Camaro will cost as much a base Corvette. None of this technology will appear anywhere but on Corvettes and the one special Camaro. It won't appear on, or in, GM products besides these two vehicles. Meanwhile, they'll do fist bumps in Bowling Green and brag about how they make "world class" products. GM shouldn't keep their best technology for the Corvette, they should share as much as possible throughout the whole company.

    • Low_compression Low_compression on Mar 27, 2017

      Hey, it took GM 55+ years to share the fully independent suspension with the Camaro!

  • VoGhost Just reminding us all that we have to tolerate dealers (many of whom are billionaires) in the US if we want new legacy ICE vehicles because the dealers pay for the campaigns of local politicians, with our money.
  • 1995 SC I'm still trying to get past the fact that the Red Bull guy is married to a Spice Girl.
  • Ravenuer Not into F1. Started watching NASCAR back when they raced actual cars. (yeah I'm that old). Not any more. They aren't "stock cars" now. Not even close. Even drag races don't interest me anymore. Races are over in 3 seconds.
  • Wjtinfwb No confusion on my end, Ghost. The Government has zero role in job creation outside of the legitimate opportunities' created by Government going about it's responsibilities, namely keeping the American people and territory safe from foreign intrusion. Of course, they're failing epically at that but that's a different topic. The American free enterprise system is what enables job creation. Government's role is to stay out of the way of that system, but they seem incapable of doing so. Oil & Gas exploration is just one example. If a National Job Policy is what you're looking for, there are other countries that will be happy to accept your application for residency.
  • Michael Smith I drive 100-300 miles a day in new BMWs, Mercedes-Benzes, and GM SUVs. Some are already equipped with automatic braking.It's the first thing I turn off when I start the car.I've had experiences where (as the author notes) the system gave false alarms and stabbed the brake pedal, threatening my ability to control the car.Further, every driver encounters situations where, for example, legal following distance must be momentarily compromised in order to avoid a difficult situation. When the system intervenes, it disrupts the driver's plan of action. This can lead to a collision as the driver has to suddenly react not to his surroundings, but to the system.Not only is automatic braking an insult to skilled drivers, it's dangerous to everyone.
Next