Ace of Base: 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

There’s been no shortage of digital ink spilled over the impending return of Alfa Romeo to North American shores, with declarations of a grand return being touted all the way back in 2000 when the company entered into a partnership with General Motors. Yes, General Motors.

Now, of course, we know Alfa’s part in Sergio’s grand plan for the House of FCA. Since the introduction of the sinewy Giulia, the hot and unpronounceable Quadrifoglio has gotten all the press. How does a base Giulia stack up at $37,995?

The least expensive of the three Giulias of which one can choose houses a 2.0-liter turbocharged four under its bulbous, Italian hood. All new and made in Italy, the mill zings out 280 horsepower and – by all accounts – sounds grittier and gnarlier than the turbo-fours from Audi or BMW. Sixty mph appears in five and a half seconds. I like my cars with soul, particularly the base models.

Rear-wheel drive is standard in the base Giulia, as is FCA’s eight-speed automatic. Alfa charges a premium for the usual fifty shades of grey but the splendid Rosso Red is a freebie. Choose it. It looks great, as does the matching black/red leather interior combination. Gaudy red brake calipers are a no-cost option. I think they’re fabulous.

Optional packages include fripperies such as a larger-than-stock infotainment screen and driving nannies like adaptive cruise and lane keeping. Save your pennies and leave ‘em on the shelf. The $1,250 Sport Appearance Package is mighty tempting, adding tasty 18-inch aluminium wheels and natty fascias, but the Giulia looks pretty hot right out of the box.

A sub-$40,000 Giulia has the ingredients to be a handler, too. A quick, 11.8:1-ratio in the steering rack translates into a snappy 2.3 turns lock-to-lock, suggesting speedy responses on the back roads. If the four-door Alfa imbues that response with good feedback and road feel, then it won’t be just the Quadrifoglio that gets positive press.

So, a true Ace of Base, then? Not quite. I’d shell out an extra $500 for the fantastic 17-inch, 7-hole Phone Dial rims, which ape the style of those on the eye-watering 4C. Other than that, though, I find a base Giulia quite appealing. It’s a first-year Italian car built in the same plant that used to assemble the Fiat Brava. What could possibly go wrong?

Not every base model has aced it. The ones that have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 73 comments
  • Felix Hoenikker Felix Hoenikker on Feb 16, 2017

    Wasn't the late Dodge Dart based on the Giulia platform?

  • Vsex Vsex on Feb 21, 2017

    "It’s a first-year Italian car built in the same plant that used to assemble the Fiat Brava. What could possibly go wrong?" If you would know something about Italian cars, you would know that Brava is /was one of best Fiats for long time. It was actually very good car.

  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
  • SCE to AUX Unresolved safety issues are a good reason to strike.
  • Eliyahu Tesla is working as well as a full self-driving company can be expected to.
  • JMII No.
Next