Why Didn't Honda Give the 2018 Odyssey All-Wheel Drive?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

When Honda unveiled the new Odyssey minivan, it highlighted its boosted engine output, added gears, enhanced interior functionality, and the ability to spy on your entire family via its unique in-car surveillance system. One thing that wasn’t mentioned, however, was all-wheel drive.

Despite Toyota’s Sienna offering optional AWD and Chrysler admitting that it’s considering a future incarnation of the Pacifica platform with all-wheel drive, Honda decided to keep the Odyssey a purely two-wheel affair. That’s an odd choice considering sport utility traits are currently en vogue and it rides on the same platform as the AWD Ridgeline, MDX, and Pilot. So why didn’t the engineers at Honda just toss on a transfer case and call it a day?

Because that would spoil everything that made the Odyssey a great minivan.

“We looked at it, and one of the things we know is in order to put in all-wheel drive, we’re going to have to raise the vehicle and we’re going to compromise the interior,” John Mendel, executive vice president of Honda, told Automotive News. “We really don’t want to do that.”

Honda claims it was fixated on establishing a versatile and functional interior — and that adding AWD would have stymied its efforts. After all, the cabin space is where minivans typically shine the brightest and Honda’s “Magic Slide” second-row seats are something company seems particularly proud of. They might not have been possible with a prop shaft running down the vehicle’s center.

There is also a highly dedicated consumer group that prefers the flexibility and low load heights. Raising the Odyssey would only serve to alienate them and sabotage its role as a family-hauler. Besides, ground-clearance and AWD-obsessed families aren’t going to want a lifted minivan anyway.

“For that customer we have the Pilot,” Mendel said.

[Image: Honda]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 114 comments
  • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Jan 17, 2017

    I think Honda's doing their customers a favor by not trying to push that half-assed "real time" AWD on them. That, or they simply have more respect for the intelligence of their minivan buyers than their CUV buyers.

  • Conslaw Conslaw on Jan 17, 2017

    In the 21st century, for non off-road vehicles AWD is best accomplished with electric motors in the rear rather than a driveshaft. The "D" models of the Tesla model S, with all-wheel drive are heavier and faster but get more miles on the same charge because of efficiency in putting power down and picking it up again. Even on an otherwise non-electric vehicle, the AWD version of the Toyota Rav-4 brings power to the rear wheels with an electric motor. This preserves space in the compact vehicle and maximizes fuel economy.

    • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Jan 18, 2017

      It does seem like the logical way to do it. I expect to see more of that layout.

  • ToolGuy™ I have always resented how GM did not consult me on styling choices.
  • ToolGuy™ Ford produces 6,819 vehicles in about 17 minutes.
  • ToolGuy™ Yes, but No. And Maybe. With upscale soft-touch interior materials, especially below the armrest.(I am training to be an Automotive Journalist.)
  • Orange260z In 2007 we drove from Regina SK to LA via Flagstaff, and Las Vegas, returning via Sam Francisco, Reno and Northern NV. The Montana "reasonable and prudent" had been repealed by then, and Montana actually had the slowest highway speeds of our trip.Through Utah, Arizona, and Nevada we were quite surprised to see a steady flow of traffic at speeds of approximately 100mph on I15, I40, and I80, but also Hwy89, Hwy93 and other non-interstate highways. Many of the vehicles doing these speeds were full-size SUVs and pickup trucks - having owned Suburbans and Yukons I get that they are comfortable cruisers at high speed, but good luck braking or swerving at 100mph.Also had a similar experience driving back to Ontario from Dallas TX - much of the daytime interstate traffic was moving in the 85-100mph range (speed limits were generally 70--75mph).
  • Normie What IS this website doing that results in now-you-see-me-now-you-don't comments? And not just mine.
Next