Junkyard Find: 1986 Pontiac Fiero SE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Pontiac Fiero was a frequent junkyard sighting up until about a decade ago, but now they’re quite rare. So far in this series, we have seen this excessively yellow ’86, this ’88 Formula, and now today’s Iron Duke-powered ’86.

The SE was the second-to-top Fiero trim level for ’86, and it came with aluminum wheels and a black “aero package.”

Unfortunately, the SE didn’t come standard with the 140-horsepower 2.8-liter V6. Instead, the gnashy, rattly, shaky 2.5-liter pushrod Iron Duke four-cylinder offered 92 horses.

You were in the danger zone when you revved the Duke to 4,500 rpm. Meanwhile, the ’86 Toyota MR2 came with a 112-horsepower 1.6-liter engine, weighed 2,282 pounds (versus the Fiero’s 2,499 pounds), and sold for $11,298 (versus the Fiero’s $10,595). On top of that, the ’86 Honda CRX Si listed for $8,279 (though you’d probably end up paying a lot more than that), weighed a mere 1,954 pounds and packed 91 high-revving horses in its 1.5-liter engine.

Did any affordable sporty cars of the 1980s escape the decade without an application of this horrible purple window film?

The Fiero keeps its fuel tank in this tall central chassis spine, and the coolant lines live in channels on the other sides of the seats. This put the Fiero driver deep in a trough.

I was in college in Southern California around this time, and I don’t recall seeing a single Fiero in the campus parking lots. Plenty of shiny new Volkswagen GTIs, Fox Mustangs, and Honda CRXs, of course, but no Fieros. Maybe things were different in the Midwest.

Strangely, no mention of the Iron Duke in this ad.

[Image: © 2016 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • TomLU86 TomLU86 on Jun 06, 2016

    Let's all try to get along. Everyone has a point... AIDS was not trivial...but if 50 million have died of malaria since DDT was banned, and we can't quantify the benefit (and we probably can't), THAT is worse. Reagan made people feel good again, yes. He also PRESIDED OVER an era in which debt on many levels increased to levels that (till then) had been unprecedented--public and private. This paved the way for where we are. Yet, he Reagan had common sense. He actually talked to the Soviets, and did NOT provoke them. HE did not cause the massive deficits that ran up the debt--but he was not entirely innocent. The Democratic Congress ran up entitlements. Reagan wanted to cut taxes and increase defense (which contributed to the end of the Cold War), and to get enough Dem support, he let the Dems spend on THEIR priorities. Key words...SPEND! As for Carter, I remember the malaise era...1979, peak malaise! US hostages in Iran, the aborted rescue debacle, the spike in gas prices that year. Later, in the 80s, I learned that "Jimmuh" was the choice of the 'establishment'--so I liked him even less. Mr. Human Rights lifted the lame US arms embargo on Turkey, which had illegally attacked Cyprus, and in which 7 Americans simply...vanished. Carter = LOSER!!! And yet, now, looking back, Carter also had a few good points. The biggest was, to try to reduce energy use in particular, and live within our means in general. That didn't play well with the voters then. But now we seem overextended...to me at least. As for the Fiero--like many good "new" GM ideas, it wasn't ready for prime time at lauch (Corvair--rear sway bar, Vega, bad engine & rust, X-car...) but at the end of it's life, the Fiero V6 5-spd was a terrific car by the standards of 1988! And while Carter's malaise era winners were....full-size GM cars and Ford's Fox Fairmonts, Reagan presided over the renaissance of good cars people could afford---starting with the 82 Ford's Fox Mustang GT, the PA-made 83 Rabbit GTI, and (sadly for GM) many imports (Honda Civics, the Toyota Supra and MR2), the 82 Accord, the 86 Taurus.....

  • Nicktcfcsb Nicktcfcsb on Jun 10, 2016

    Speaking of the purple window tint, I had an old timer tell me it was the high levels of ammonia in window cleaner that did the black to purple change, maybe he was wrong but I've never used any window cleaner since on tinted windows. R.i.p lil mid engine buddy

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next