Junkyard Find: 1984 Mitsubishi Starion LE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Many of us laugh at the Starion now, but it was considered genuinely badass by me and my high-school peers back in 1983 or 1984. It looked fast and mean and had the magical-in-the-1980s word “TURBO” on every possible surface.

Of course, it was also a flaky, breakdown-prone money pit, but it took a few years for that to become clear to everyone. Still, Starions show up in self-service wrecking yards to this day. Here’s a battered ’84 that I saw in the San Francisco Bay Area a while back.

It’s not enough to have TURBO badges on the outside of the car. You need TURBO seatbelts as well! If ever a car screamed for the legendary 2″ screen black-and-white in-dash TV, it was the Starion.

Mitsubishi was all about the futuristic technology back then. Thermostat-based HVAC systems were found in hyper-expensive Mercedes-Benzes and the occasional Detroit luxury car (where this feature didn’t work so well).

The 2.6 liter Astron four-cylinder engine went in many Mitsubishi and Chrysler machines during the 1970s and 1980s. In fact, you could get a Chrysler K-car with this engine and “Hemi 2.6” badges.

Wailing guitars, turbo whoosh, a magical princess, and Super Potential!

In New Jersey, the Starion was advertised with scenes from “Cannonball Run II”, and the “turbo seats” get a mention.

Mitsubishi brings The Turbo Age down to earth!






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Hagerty and The Truth About Cars.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 37 comments
  • Jim brewer Jim brewer on Oct 19, 2015

    I wanted one when they came out when I was a young buck. Msrp around $17k as I recall, so, not cheap. Back then, all Japanese cars were assumed to be excellent, and if anything, Mitsu was considered more cutting edge than other Japanese cars.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Oct 19, 2015

    Ah, the miserable 2.555L Mitsubishi 4-cylinder! Revered at first, then hated for eternity. They must have shared head gasket technology with their 3.0 V6.

    • See 2 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Nov 19, 2015

      @matador My parent's 88 Dynasty bought new had that engine - and it was billowing blue oil clouds and having random stalls by 80k miles. They learned their lesson on Chrysler, and replaced it with a 94 Grand Voyager. s.s

  • Big Wheel The Mk8 is NOT the generation to have.I'm the second owner of a MK7 2021 GTI, purchased in 2022. As others have said, great car, fun to drive. We were so lucky to find the perfect spec we wanted. We didn't want an MK8 because they were too new at the time, & had the blasted haptic/touch buttons everywhere. Plus the huge tacked on screen. So we wanted one close to or at the end of the MK7 run. White exterior color due to the Florida sun (even though it's in a garage most of the time). Base S trim with the must have plaid cloth seats. No sunroof. Real hard buttons on the steering wheel make controlling the radio & other items a breeze. Three round HVAC dials as God intended. Just a small touchscreen, but fully integrated into the dash, that we don't use anyway. And of course the six speed manual, topped with the golf ball dimpled shift knob. My youngest son learned to drive on it, & loves it more than anything (he's got several GTI posters on his bedroom wall). I think he's going to have it for many many years. Only 38,000 miles on it now, & no issues (knock on wood). I'm aware of the water pump issue & I think ignition coils are also a sore spot for these engines. Keeping my fingers crossed. Put a set of Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 tires on it 2 years ago, with Enkei rims. Love it.
  • Buickman Classic Buzz Kill
  • Lorenzo The 1970s! When mid-size cars of the late 1960s became full size coupes just by getting a couple inches wider, and a foot and a half longer, on the same wheelbase. But the interiors were marvelous, compared to what came before.It's just as well neither of the optional engines were chosen, since the old Cruise-O-Matic was the only transmission option. OTOH, that extra width and length added hundreds of pounds of curb weight, adding to the sluggish performance. Having lived through the 1970s, I could not understand why cars were getting bigger, while engines were becoming less powerful (and not just because of the switch to net horsepower) while gasoline prices were going up, and octane ratings were going down.Then again, you would be hard pressed to find interiors with such luxury touches today, especially color choices. This is a good example of a lot of sheet metal moving slowly while the driver sits in the lap of luxury, later to be rendered junkyard fodder when parking spaces everywhere were downsized.
  • Redapple2 flawed product. from the jump
  • Parkave231 The shot of the climate controls (well, the whole interior, really) brought back memories of my dad's '74 Ranchero 500. Little five-year-old me couldn't comprehend why there was a place for a rear window switch...and yet the rear window in dad's Ranchero didn't go down.
Next