Volkswagen Eos Review

Jay Shoemaker
by Jay Shoemaker

There is no way to overstate the appeal of the new Volkswagen Eos’ folding hardtop. I sat inside the car for ten minutes, opening and closing the lid, marveling at the mechanism’s precision and design. What kind of mind can develop something that folds and unfolds with such infinite grace? If you like to visit high speed factories spitting out hundreds of widgets per minute, filling them with liquids and shrink wrapping them in three swift motions, then you will never tire of lowering and raising the Eos’ five-piece hardtop. As for the rest of Vee Dub’s CSC (coupe-sunroof-convertible), it’s danger, boredom ahead.

All the time, effort and money VW’s engineers spent creating and manufacturing the Eos’ hardtop must have been scrimped from the company’s design department. Although there’s plenty of concave and convex “flame surfacing” in the usual places (wheel arches, door bottoms), there’s nothing even mildly warm about the Eos’ overall look. While the detailing takes German minimalism to the next level (dull and insipid), the proportions are the real passion killer. The overhangs are grossly mismatched, the ascending beltline says “tip-toeing bathtub” and the rearwards sloping rear deck is just plain wrong. At best (i.e. after you buy one), the Eos is “cute.” For those of us who remain on the sidelines, "homely and unlovable" is closer to the truth.

As befits a car that was shown as a concept just 18 months ago, the Eos’ interior is a parts bin special. Although the fascia is all new, all the bits slotted in are standard Golf fare— and none the worse for it. It’s a clean look with faultless ergonomics, from cosseting chairs to simple controls. Our tester’s Sport package (about $3500) adds some much needed spizzarkle– aluminum trim and wikkid dials– to the cabin’s otherwise dour demeanor. There aren’t a lot of high tech toys, but the [optional] satellite radio gets channeled through an [optional] mini Marshall stack and the [optional] corner steering xenon lighting makes drivers feel positively Lexian.

Pistonheads note: the folding hardtop VW Eos is no one trick pony. Provided you stump-up for VW’s dual shift gearbox (DSG), it’s a one-and-a-half trick pony. The superb paddle shift system, which has transformed ugly ducklings like the VW GTI and Audi A3 into F1 soaring Eagles, turns the Eos into a runt swan. Credit the extra weight of the hardtop top, its motor and the chassis strengthening needed to maintain torsional rigidity. It does nothing for the car’s dynamics, except spoil them.

VW’s press site pegs the Eos’ curb weight at 3503 lbs. That would make the Eos (which sits on a modified Passat platform) just 195 pounds heavier than a GTI. It feels three times that. Even under full throttle, the DSG labors to make anything happen. The razor-sharp small VW driving experience is decidedly dumbed down. Our tester had the base engine: a 2.0-liter, 200hp, turbocharged four. This mill, so willing and frisky in all the other VW/Audi executions, feels overwhelmed and peaky in this application. If you want to buy this top– I mean car, wait for September, when the factory starts building the Eos with a 250hp V6.

Of course, the Eos’ ponderousness steals more than the accelerative joy normally derived from this engine and transmission combination. The “I can’t believe this is a front driver” handling experience from the GTI is lost as well. Understeer is the party guest from Hell, arriving early and staying late. The props top also seems to unbalance the equation vertically; the Eos navigates curves like an ungainly and top heavy SUV. In addition to the nautical motions, you also get a maritime soundtrack: the top creaks and groans over rough patches like an old wooden schooner.

If the Jetta is all grown up, the Eos is an octogenarian. Its lethargic performance and high quality materials highlight the blue rinse effect. The pricing punctuates these observations. The 2.0-liter Eos starts under $30k, and quickly ascends in the high 30’s. The 3.2 will easily break $40k. Hardtop or no, the GTI is looking more and more like the pick of the litter.

Anyway, the Eos is clearly another “lifestyle” Volkswagen aimed at the empty nest/trustafarian market. While the Eos’ retractable hardtop is nothing new from the likes of the Mercedes (SL/SLK), we’re grateful that the new Vee Dub brings Germany's open and shut case to the masses. If Wolfsburg had attached their wundertop to a more attractive package, they would have had an instant classic. Instead, they’ve built a highly polished though dynamically dull machine whose appeal— and sales— will rely almost entirely on the novelty of its hood. Will that party trick be enough to move the metal? Absolutely.

Jay Shoemaker
Jay Shoemaker

More by Jay Shoemaker

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 103 comments
  • Michael Karesh Michael Karesh on Aug 27, 2006

    I'd been planning to drive one of these. But when I went to the dealer a few weeks ago, I had to choose between a manual GTI and DSG GLI. I'd already driven a manual GLI, so I went with the DSG car. Has anyone driven both the GLI and GTI? Do they feel any different?

  • Titan Titan on Sep 24, 2006

    I checked this site in the hopes of useful reviews in search of a new car. What I feel I found is a site organized by a group of testosterone driven teens. The language is trite with pre-packaged phrases, competition for sarcasm the rule. "My dog is better than your dog" disguised as a review. Those who can dig through the "review?" searching for some insight best not question it lest they be driven back by insults. I thought I was on CNet where juveniles argue over who's cell phones or mp3 players "rule". Nothing I found useful.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I don't understand ... red texas residents hates earth saving hippy electric cars ... did a invasion of democrats occur ??
  • Macca I'm a bit disappointed in the CX-90, albeit from a brief test drive a couple weeks ago. We'll be buying a three-row SUV this summer and the CX-90 had been my top pick based on the initial reveal. Our local dealer didn't have any S Premium/Plus on the lot to drive so they stuck us in a mid-level PHEV. Once I got in and oriented myself to the gauges I noticed that the battery was depleted. I was shocked at the unrefined nature of the 2.5L I4 - it was quite loud, louder than I've experienced in a newer vehicle. It was thrashy and also didn't seem to rev smoothly. Even my former 1st-gen Mazda3 GT (2.3L) was more refined with regard to under-hood noises emanating into the cabin and NVH in general. In essentially ICE-only mode, it was only adequate when it came to acceleration, which isn't surprising. More road noise intrusion than I would like also seems to be a persistent Mazda trait despite recurring claims of addressing noise levels. Agree that the shifter 'innovation' here from Mazda is just silly and doesn't improve functionality. The super-shallow aspect ratio to the nav screen is an odd choice and not terribly pleasing.I can partially understand the choice to package the CX-70/90 in this manner, but it would seem neither model quite lives up to the aspirational pricing. Instead it feels like the price premium serves to help a small automaker stay solvent. Even more distressing is that the forum research I've done so far for the CX-90 is that it isn't quite fully baked and has some significant issues for many early adopters. I know owner's forums aren't the gospel for reliability, but some of the CX-90 horror stories I read were only outdone by true lemons like the Grand Cherokee/Wagoneer debacle. I am a Mazda fan and would gladly help support the brand if the product was dialed in, but this one fell short of expectations and fell a couple slots on our list.
  • MaintenanceCosts Tim, are you saying that the PHEV with the four is smoother with the engine running than the gas-only version with the six? If so, that's just baffling. I really should go test drive them both.Anecdotal "walking along the street" experience says that the CX-30, CX-5, and CX-50 are all taking this area by storm, but I don't see as many CX-90s. Seems like that segment is dominated around here by (Grand) Highlanders, Pilots, and Telluride/Palisades.
  • Bd2 Hyundai is, of course, not on this list as a forefront leader in ethics and accountability. Meanwhile the egg is in Toyota's face yet again.
  • Jkross22 This is likely my final chime in/experience with our leased CX9 as the lease is up in less than a month. We're getting 19.5- 20.0 mpg combined over the last few months. That's with the legacy 2.5T with the 6 speed auto. Not great but it is a responsive drive train and there's a fuel penalty for that I suppose. If you're thinking about picking up a used CX9, Mazda settled a lawsuit that extends the warranty of the 2.5T for another 2 years/24k miles. Double check to make sure the 2.5T model you're looking at is covered by this. This had to do with an oil consumption issue. We did test drive the CX90 with the inline 6. It was nice, but not what I was expecting in terms of sound and smoothness. As others have said, it ain't no BMW inline 6. Power was ok, but oddly not as responsive as the 2.5T. Maybe they'll get that sorted in the next couple of years. The improved mpg has to be due to the hybrid system and shutting off at stops. Lastly, Mazda's lease return process is terrible. They're good at reminding us the end is nigh, but they outsourced the inspection process to AutoVin. AutoVin noted a scratch that AutoVin said is normal wear and tear, but Mazda says (in their lease end paperwork) exceeds normal wear and tear. I took it to the nearest dealer and the manager there claimed to have no say in the return process and was unable/unwilling to assist.I called the leasing dealer and they said they couldn't help either. I called Mazda Finance and they said they would send AutoVin out again for a 2nd look, and no one has followed up to do this. In fact, it's extraordinarily difficult to get anyone at Mazda Finance to answer a call. Abysmal customer support all around. I would not lease a vehicle from Mazda again.Mazda says that they can send a final bill to us within 60 days if they determine there is anything beyond normal wear and tear. I guess I'll repair the scratch, but customers shouldn't be left guessing or getting conflicting information from the inspection company and the manufacturer. And neutering your dealers in this process is counterproductive and foolish.
Next