Land Rover Defender Production to End in 2015. Stricter EU Emissions Rules Blamed.

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

After 67 years in production, and more than two million produced, many of which are still in severe use, late in 2015 the last Land Rover Defender will roll off the assembly line at Jaguar Land Rover’s Solihull plant. JLR says that the Defender’s demise is because it won’t meet new fuel emissions rules in the EU and cannot be adapted to do so. A replacement model is planned, to be launched in 2016. Land Rover has previously teased the DC100 concept as a possible Defender replacement. John Edwards, who is in charge of product at JLR, said that the Defender’s replacement will be “instantly recognized” by fans of the current Defender, but that it “won’t necessarily be cheap”.

It hasn’t always been called the Defender.

That nameplate was added in the 1990s as Land Rover expanded its lineup beyond what was then called the Land Rover 90 or 110, depending on the wheelbase, and the plusher Range Rover. In 1948, when the Rover company introduced its first off-road capable vehicle, said to be inspired by American military jeeps, it was simply called the Land Rover and it wasn’t plush. It was, however, a very capable vehicle that could traverse the most challenging terrain that a four wheel vehicle might ever see. The Land Rover developed a reputation as the prototypical go-anywhere vehicle.

JLR said that the decision to kill off the Defender was “mainly legislation based,” that stricter EU emissions standards by 2020 created “certain conditions the Defender just won’t meet.” The Defender isn’t cheap to make because it doesn’t share much with other JLR products and assembly is relatively labor intensive.

Ironically, a market segment that the original Land Rover helped create, the SUV, has passed it by. Though popular with UK farmers, the Defender is just a bit too rustic for the leather and piano black set.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 48 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Oct 11, 2013

    Militaries are buying up G Wagens. In Australia our Military used 110s and 130s, now they are replaced by the Mercedes. Toyota 76 Series we have with a V8 diesel is a much more reliable and better performer. Land Rover made some really good stuff. But they didn't modernise enough. A diesel midsizer will do much of what a LR could do as well. You just have to think which is the more comfortable to use.

    • See 2 previous
    • 95_SC 95_SC on Oct 12, 2013

      @Onus The troop carrier 70 series rigs still have rear leafs

  • Hawox Hawox on Oct 11, 2013

    jap pickups are the standard in professional use. and i think a stock land cruiser or nissan with 2 locking difs aren't inferior to a stock defender with 1 locking dif. a small suzuki thanks to its light weight in some condition isn't that far from a standard land. and is more reliable, at least from my experience of a 20 y/o vitara and nearly new def 110. the land rover can be greatly upgraded with many accessories that's the point.

    • 95_SC 95_SC on Oct 12, 2013

      They make some crazy accessories for theses things...I saw one with portal axles.

  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
  • Zipper69 Honda seem to have a comprehensive range of sedans that sell well.
  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
Next