Junkyard Find: 1976 Toyota Corolla Deluxe Liftback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Having driven quite a few mid-70s Corollas (these cars were as commonplace during my early driving years as are second-gen Tauruses today), I have to say that they were painfully slow even by the tolerant standards of the Middle Malaise Era. However, they were also shockingly reliable by the era’s standards, which means that these cars were still plentiful on the street until well into the 1990s. Since few outside a hard core of fanatics have shown much interest in pre-AE86 Corollas, these cars get scrapped as soon as something expensive breaks and/or the Rust Monster’s bites get too large. Here’s a Deluxe liftback that I found in a Colorado self-serve yard a few weeks back.



“A welded body, not a nuts-and-bolts body!”

This was the era of 5-digit odometers (I believe Toyota went to 6-digit units in the early 1980s), so there’s no telling if this is a 90,278-mile car or a 590,278-mile car.

The interior is in pretty good shape, so I’m guessing this car has no more than 190,278 miles on the clock.

While the 1976 Toyota subcompact version of “Deluxe” seems laughably Spartan today, this car did have some features you didn’t see on many cars in its cheapo price range.

Rear window defroster!

AM radio with slider-style tone and volume controls!

Most cars in Colorado don’t rust much, thanks to the area’s single-digit humidity, but Japanese cars of the 1970s were surpassed only by air-cooled Volkswagens in the “rust anywhere, rust everywhere” department.

It’s possible that this car spent much of its life in the Midwest, but this Colorado dealer emblem says otherwise.

The liftback hatch made these cars excellent haulers.

That is, they were excellent haulers if you didn’t have to move anything heavy… or carry passengers… or drive uphill. The pushrod 2TC was good for 75 horsepower, but it felt like less.

If you had one of these in your 2TC car, you needed plenty of patience when negotiating freeway onramps or attempting to pass a slow camper in the mountains. Still, these engines were hard to kill.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Cls12vg30 Cls12vg30 on Jul 16, 2013

    Ah, memories. My father bought a lightly-used '78 Corolla SR5 Lift-Back in 1979, I think. It was to replace the '73 Pinto my parents had when I was born. I grew up in that Toyota, Dad drove it from the time I was 3 until I was 14. It was a dark burgundy color with those same gunmetal wheels as in the commercial. His was a 5-speed with A/C. (It was purchased in Charleston, South Carolina.) We moved to Buffalo, NY in 1986, and by the early '90s the Corolla was rusting pretty bad. One day Dad was tinkering underneath and a piece of frame rail came off in his hand. He promptly sold the car for $300. We would see it around town for at least a year after that. He's still nostalgic about that car. If I could find one in restorable condition, I'd buy it for him in a minute.

  • Jim brewer Jim brewer on Jul 18, 2013

    Had a 75 Corolla wagon as my first car out of college. Sold for 5K new and I paid $2,500 for it with 100K on the engine and 120K on the car. In those days a 5yr old Japanese car with 100K on it would sell for 1/2 its original retail value. It was reasonably spritely with the stick. Nicely appointed if simple interior, dignified lines. An all-around honest car.

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next