Suzuki Death Watch 5: How Deep Would You Cut to Make a Profit?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

The grim reaper may not be at American Suzuki’s door step after all. We’ve learned ASMC is healthier, at least financially, than we thought. But, in order to be profitable last year, ASMC had to completely cut almost every non-essential (and some essential) function of their business.


American Suzuki has been very conservatively run since introducing its motorcycle line to North America. With the automotive division only selling 26,618 units last year in the US (that’s less than both Porsche and Land Rover) and margins on those vehicles – all imported from outside North America, except for the Equator – being razor thin, it was clear as day serious cuts needed to be made if coming out of the year in the black was the main goal.

Public Relations? What Public Relations?

As we mentioned in an earlier Suzuki Death Watch article, Melissa Fujimoto is currently fielding media requests after the departure of PR veteren Jeff Holland. Before her media wrangling duties, Fujimoto spent around 10 years with promotions in an administrative role at ASMC. In 2011, all promotions activities were cancelled, leaving Fujimoto without a portfolio. So, instead of releasing the long-term, loyal employee, they made the logical choice and moved her on to other duties.

Those other duties, while including media relations, are mainly as secretary for ASMC President Seiichi Maruyama.

This may seem odd, but it makes sense when you realize ASMC’s current position. There are no plans to release any new product in the next 12-18 months, save facelifts for the Grand Vitara and SX4, so there are not a ton of media requests. Most current PR duties include reporting monthly sales and managing the press fleet, which can easily be managed by someone whose background is an administrative role in promotions.

ASMC still outsources other PR and marketing duties to Paine PR.

Auto Shows? What Auto Shows?

Before last year, ASMC participated in 66 auto shows. That number has been cut down to four. With no new product in the wings, going to extra auto shows is just an added marketing expense that isn’t needed. In some ways, it is a smart move to cut costs, yet it really takes the brand out of the public eye that may not live close to a Suzuki dealer.

The number of dealers is also dwindling. Current dealer development is arrested, with a number of franchise owners taking $50,000 buy outs to close their doors.

Everything Is Being Cut To The Bone

ASMC has lost top notch talent and has been selling very low volumes of cars with even lower margins. Yet, in 2011, ASMC made a profit and sent bonus checks to all its employees.

“People don’t understand how frugally (Suzuki) can run a car company,” said one source who spoke under condition of anonymity, “When employees of other automakers tell me how much they spend on things, it blows me away.”

Those profits come with a cost. Brand recognition is at an all time low. Product development is virtually non-existant. And, over time, more talent will leave for less stressful pastures. While the mood at Suzuki is currently said to be “normal”, its hard to ignore the deafening silence of a dearth of new product and a shrinking dealer network.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 20 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Aug 08, 2012

    Perhaps Suzuki intends to survive like Checker Motor Co., which limped through the 1980s selling a few taxicabs and doing metal stamping for GM. Surprisingly, Checker did not file for bankruptcy until 2009.

    • See 3 previous
    • Ranwhenparked Ranwhenparked on Aug 08, 2012

      Checker also dabbled in a number of other businesses - International Controls, Great Dane trailers, Yellow Cab, American Country Insurance, and some others. I believe the Markin family may still own all or part of some of Checker's affiliated businesses. Diversification through acquisition is another option for American Suzuki to survive. It also worked for Studebaker, which survived until 1979, when it was absorbed by McGraw-Edison. Of course, the big thing that makes this different is that Checker and Studebaker were American automakers that collapsed in the American market. Suzuki is a Japanese automaker that is struggling on the American market, but that is still quite strong in most other places, including at home. They really can afford to fail here, to a certain extent, and let the rest of the world carry them.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 11, 2012

    Why not rebadge other Japanese models and sell them as Suzuki in US. E.g. let them rebadge Nissan Altima as Suzuki and in exchange let Nissan sell pianos and other musical instruments under their badge. As far as I know it is normal practice in Japan. IIRC Suziku were rebadged Daewoos until recently. Then they tried to sell some obscure model based on GM short wheelbase platform which was praised by journalists.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next