Junkyard Find: 1986 Nissan 200SX Turbo

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

It’s hard to get more stereotypically 80s than this car. Weird Japanese styling, headache-inducing upholstery patterns, and— most important— TURBO! I was 20 years old when this car was new, and the sight of this Crusher-bound example gave me terrible A-Ha flashbacks.

While not quite as gloriously ridiculous as the Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo, and not as fast as the Dodge Omni GLH, the 200SX Turbo came with a respectable-for-the-time 120 force-fed horses under the hood.

Well, maybe not so respectable when you consider the 200SX’s curb weight: 2,734 pounds.

So it was a bit sluggish for an alleged sporty car. So what? Check out the seats!


You see, the word “Turbo” had magical connotations during the middle 1980s. Major Motion!








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Cls12vg30 Cls12vg30 on Apr 19, 2012

    I'm quite the 200SX aficionado, having had a 1982 hatch for my first car, and a 1988 SE V6, which I still own, but is currently in project status. It was my daily driver from 2001-2009, and I put about 110K miles on it in that time. There's actually a small but loyal following for these cars on forums like www.club-s12.org. The VG30 model is a fun car, with a nice flat torque curve. It always handled well, but since I installed 1.5" lowering springs it corners like it's on rails. The V6 model is noticeably more nose-heavy than the four-banger cars, but as was mentioned above, it's lighter than the 300ZX overall. The CA18DET was only available on these cars in Asia and Australia. The CA18ET, like this one, isn't the strongest but takes well to upgrades. Many 200SX Turbo owners I know have successfully upped the boost by adapting Volvo intercoolers. These cars also take well to SR20 or KA24 transplants. It sucks to see an S12 in the junkyard, but it's nice to see these forgotten cars getting some attention. BTW, Consumer Reports listed the base 2.0 liter 1988 200SX at $12,349 for the notchback, $12,599 for the hatchback. The SE V6 came only as a hatch, listed at $15,399. The 1.8 Turbo was not available in 1987 or 1988, being replaced by the V6.

  • Obbop Obbop on Apr 20, 2012

    Op-art

  • JLGOLDEN Enormous competition is working against any brand in the fight for "luxury" validation. It gets murky for Cadillac's image when Chevy, Buick, and GMC models keep moving up the luxury features (and price) scale. I think Cadillac needs more consistency with square, crisp designs...even at the expense of aerodynamics and optimized efficiency. Reintroduce names such as DeVille, Seville, El Dorado if you want to create a stir.
  • ClipTheApex I don't understand all of the negativity from folks on this forum regarding Europeans. Having visited the EU multiple times across different countries, I find they are very much like us in North America-- not as different as politicians like to present them. They all aren't liberal "weenies." They are very much like you and me. Unless you've travelled there and engaged with them, it's easy to digest and repeat what we hear. I wish more Americans would travel abroad. When they return, they will have a different view of America. We are not as perfect or special as we like to believe. And no, many Europeans don't look up to America. Quite the opposite, actually.
  • Dwford Let's face it, Cadillac is planning minimal investment in the current ICE products. Their plan is to muddle through until the transition to full EV is complete. The best you are going to get is one more generation of ICE vehicles built on the existing platforms. What should Cadillac do going forward? No more vehicles under $50k. No more compact vehicles. Rely on Buick for that. Many people here mention Genesis. Genesis doesn't sell a small sedan, and they don't sell a small crossover. They sell midsize and above. So should Cadillac.
  • EBFlex Sorry BP. They aren’t any gaps
  • Bd2 To sum up my comments and follow-up comments here backed by some data, perhaps Cadillac should look to the Genesis formula in order to secure a more competitive position in the market. Indeed, by using bespoke Rwd chassis, powertrains and interiors Genesis is selling neck and neck with Lexus while ATPs are 15 to 35% higher depending on the segment you are looking at. While Lexus can't sell Rwd sedans, Genesis is outpacing them 2.2 to 1.Genesis is an industry world changing success story, frankly Cadillac would be insane to not replicate it for themselves.
Next