Piston Slap: An "Occasional Jaunt" On...Winter Tires?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Anonymous writes:

Sajeev,

Recently I picked up a set of Bridgestone Blizzak WS60 winter tires for my 2006 Mitsubishi Evolution IX GSR (lightly modded at approximately 350 whp/320 wtq) and unfortunately I was unable to get a “V” speed rating in winter tires as they only came in “H”.

http://www.bridgestonetire.com/productdetails/TireSubBrand/Blizzak_LM-60

How dead-set are those tire ratings? I wonder because there was an “incident” involving myself, another Evo and a BMW 135i which included speeds in excess of the 130mph speed rating (surface conditions were dry, closed road, no spectators). Would an occasional jaunt above the speed rating of the tire cause long-term damage to the tire, or would it take a constant load to delaminate from the rim?

Thank you in advance for your time.

Sajeev answers:

Being an H-town boy who only enjoys visiting cold climates for business or vacation gives me pause on my answer. And while there’s street racing aplenty over here, we don’t try to find ourselves in jail on the wings of flying winter tires. So with that in mind…

Your question has too many conditionals and vague language (for good reason, I assume) to give a solid answer. As such, here’s a crappy answer: a tire’s performance deteriorates over time, as rubber naturally hardens, stress cracks, etc. A 1-2 year old tire might be fine running up to its speed rating, in theory. Temperature also comes into play: if you live in 100+ degree weather and want to drive triple digits for sustained periods, your tires will go much sooner than someone doing the same at 60 degrees.

Duration is a big concern, as you mentioned. There’s a good chance you can run Blizzaks at or above their speed rating for less than a minute with no problem. If you ran it for 10 minutes or longer? That “good chance” turns into a “not bloody likely” in my opinion. This notion is described in far better detail on the eng-tips.com forum.

Perhaps it goes without saying, but this behavior is pretty stupid. And since many of us are guilty of this automotive sin, we shouldn’t be proud of doing it…even if damn near everyone with a lead foot and a 250+ hp vehicle has tried it at some point in their lives. I’m not here to judge, just to speak my mind. Best of luck.

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com . Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Sajeev Mehta Sajeev Mehta on Mar 19, 2012

    FYI: I posted this as anonymous, the person who wrote the letter didn't request it.

  • Advance_92 Advance_92 on Mar 19, 2012

    Good on you. Anyone who says they were on a 'closed road' rather than at 'the track' is just asking for a serious flame job.

  • MrIcky no
  • Keith_93 I've rented both in the past few months. The RAV4 was OK, but the CX5 is wayyyy more civilized. Mazda really impressed me, impressive car on the highway. Simply a well thought out and pleasant drive.
  • AZFelix "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer..."I will adorn the many surfaces of my car with 'do not enter' and 'stop' signs."Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."
  • Ajla Ajla, the head of the "ajla is cool" awareness organization, believes that ajla is cool.
  • Ajla I don't have interest in owning an autonomous car. I certainly don't think I'd ever "embrace it" because I like driving my car. Would I be "scared" taking a ride in an AV in 2024? Probably, although not hysterical about it. Statistically the majority of accidents, especially fatal accidents, are caused by reckless or impaired driving. I don't do those things and the AV technology of 2024 won't really save you from other people being insane on the road.
Next