Arizona: 127,000 Voters Pledge Opposition To Photo Radar

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The group CameraFraud.com announced yesterday that 127,000 Arizona voters had made it clear that they want voters decide the future of automated enforcement in the state. The figure fell short by about ten percent of the number legally required to force a measure onto the ballot against the will of lawmakers. Initiative proponents see this as a merely temporary setback. Arizonans Against Photo Radar Chairman Shawn Dow believes that his group is stronger than ever and will be able to flex its political muscle to force change in the state.

“We received more signatures than all of the candidates for governor combined, yet they can get on the ballot and we can’t,” Arizonans Against Photo Radar Chairman Shawn Dow told TheNewspaper.

A team of volunteers delivered 8000 fully signed sheets of signatures, each containing fifteen names, yielding 120,000 names. Another 1000 half-filled sheets were counted in a preliminary look by officials from the secretary of state’s office. The final figure is the equivalent of 12.8 percent of the votes cast in the 2008 presidential primaries and 5.5 percent of votes cast in the general election. The initiative got just 66,000 fewer signatures than Barack Obama received votes in the primary.

“With an all-volunteer crew, you’re limited to working on weekends — and there wasn’t a single weekend without an event,” Dow said. “It was hard work getting that far. We did not stop, not for one minute.”

The group brought the signed petitions to Governor Jan Brewer’s office to convince her to push the legislature to place the initiative on the ballot and let voters have the final say in the matter. If Brewer fails to act, Dow suggests one of Brewer’s primary opponents may be interested in picking up the support of photo radar opponents. The second prong of the group’s revised strategy involves taking the referendum effort to individual cities where collecting hundreds of signatures — as opposed to hundreds of thousands of signatures — is a much easier task.

Maryland residents took the same strategy after just barely falling short of collecting enough signatures for a statewide anti-camera referendum on a tight deadline. Under a local battle strategy, 62 percent of voters in the town of Sykesville insisted in May on sending the traffic camera companies packing. No photo enforcement program has ever survived a public vote.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • 68camaro 68camaro on Jul 30, 2010

    I don't like the idea of banning the cameras. I think you can do things to make the systems work better and make sure that the city's don't game the systems. Banning technology that has the ability to keep us safer on the streets without really sacrificing anything seems ridiculous to me.

  • Truthhurts Truthhurts on Aug 02, 2010

    There is always a group of people that are opposed to enforcing laws- in this case, apparently they couldn't find enough people in AZ that would fall for it. The cameras keep the roads safer because they change driver behavior- which is the point.

  • Rover Sig Market placement: One good (large) car, one good (mid-sized) SUV, plus the Escalade (because).Attention to detail. I see nice looking caddies with some ugly features (wheels, trim). I don't know about interiors because no one I know has a caddie.The world does not need another BMW. Not everybody is in sales. Cadillac could be selling cars to all of us Boomers, who remember the large Oldsmobiles, Buicks, Mercuries, etc., of yesteryear and their comfort and, yes, style of a sort.
  • Tassos Back in my day, Nissans were the choice for forward-thinking, progressive folks who appreciated quality and innovation. But now? Seems like they're just for those who can't afford better. It's a shame to see a brand with such promise become the go-to for the budget-conscious (POORS!) crowd. Makes you wonder what happened to standards and aspirations. Guess you can't expect much from a generation that thinks a Nissan is a status symbol.
  • MaintenanceCosts The 2024 Lincoln Nautilus is actually doing what Cadillac ought to do to the XT5. Giant wraparound screen, very showy interior with fancy materials, new emphasis on quiet.
  • Tassos You know, back when cars were built to last, we didn't have all this fuss about "new car smell" being toxic. It's just another liberal conspiracy to make us fear everything, including the scent of American ingenuity. If you ask me, it's all a ploy by Big Government to regulate every aspect of our lives, right down to the air we breathe in our own cars. Give me freedom over a fake fragrance any day! BIDEN NEW CAR SMELLS
  • Aja8888 I love my new car smell as it's better than smelling the refineries and chemical plants around me here in Houston.
Next