Lutz Farewell Musings: GM Incapable Of Building A Bad Car

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Bob Lutz, set to retire May 1, feels confident he’s left GM fixed and on the right track. In an interview at the Detroit News, Lutz states: “I think I’m leaving the company finally focused back on the right thing, General Motors spent 30 years chasing every kind of metric — hours per vehicle, base-engineered content, parts re-use, attainment of diversity targets — 50 different metrics, and excellent products was sort of one. The naïve belief was if you track every one of the metrics and you do well on every one, the end result is a great car company — not,” According to Maximum Bob, that’s all behind now: “Over 8 1/2 years, we have been able to destroy that whole culture.” And bankrupt the company. Oops; I know, Bob had nothing to do with that.

Lutz said that he knew it was time to retire after walking the floor of the Geneva auto show last month: “I looked at all of those wacko design proposals and really bad stuff from (European designers) and bad concepts, I thought ‘This is not much fun anymore,’ ” he said. Perhaps he’s forgetting the long history of wacky European concepts, like the Quasar Unipower in 1967. The past always looks better as we get older.

Is he worried that GM might backslide after he goes? “I don’t think the company is capable of doing a bad car,” he said, adding that “there would be armed revolution” if GM executives failed to put design first. The Solstice was cute, wasn’t it? Design first; practicality and ergonomics not.

And Lutz has some predictions for the future: We will all be soaring the skies in flying cars. Just kidding. But its not that far from that either: In 20 or 30 years, he said, “You won’t be driving. It will all be done by computer. You will program in your destination, put yourself in your car. It will start and drive itself. It may seem sad for some of us, but I don’t think I will be around in 30 years to where I have worry about it anyway”.


Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Odomeater Odomeater on Apr 05, 2010

    "Save the Toyotas for us to drive." At your own risk, of course.

  • Wsn Wsn on Apr 05, 2010

    It's weird that Lutz fans would claim that he is a "products" guy. Tell me, exactly which GM vehicle is considered class leading? Malibu? No. Cobalt? No. Aveo? No. Pickup? Not bad, but would you say a Silverado is "leading" an F150? CTS-V? Close, but it's an irrelevant (sales wise) product to begin with.

  • Redapple2 4 Keys to a Safe, Modern, Prosperous Society1 Cheap Energy2 Meritocracy. The best person gets the job. Regardless.3 Free Speech. Fair and strong press.4 Law and Order. Do a crime. Get punished.One large group is damaging the above 4. The other party holds them as key. You are Iran or Zimbabwe without them.
  • Alan Where's Earnest? TX? NM? AR? Must be a new Tesla plant the Earnest plant.
  • Alan Change will occur and a sloppy transition to a more environmentally friendly society will occur. There will be plenty of screaming and kicking in the process.I don't know why certain individuals keep on touting that what is put forward will occur. It's all talk and BS, but the transition will occur eventually.This conversation is no different to union demands, does the union always get what they want, or a portion of their demands? Green ideas will be put forward to discuss and debate and an outcome will be had.Hydrogen is the only logical form of renewable energy to power transport in the future. Why? Like oil the materials to manufacture batteries is limited.
  • Alan As the established auto manufacturers become better at producing EVs I think Tesla will lay off more workers.In 2019 Tesla held 81% of the US EV market. 2023 it has dwindled to 54% of the US market. If this trend continues Tesla will definitely downsize more.There is one thing that the established auto manufacturers do better than Tesla. That is generate new models. Tesla seems unable to refresh its lineup quick enough against competition. Sort of like why did Sears go broke? Sears was the mail order king, one would think it would of been easier to transition to online sales. Sears couldn't adapt to on line shopping competitively, so Amazon killed it.
  • Alan I wonder if China has Great Wall condos?
Next