Curbside Classic: 1979 Suzuki Jimny (LJ80/SJ20) Pickup

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

This little truck slays me. It’s just so damn cute and toy-like, my desire to take it home and put it in my playroom is mighty powerful. Have you ever seen anything like it before? I didn’t think so; I never had. But then it’s not exactly a US spec vehicle, not surprisingly, although how exactly these illegal aliens make it through the cracks and get licensed is beyond me. And it’s hardly the only one in town, along with the Nissan Pao. And they’re both almost the same color. Maybe that’s the key. Anyway, someone is fulfilling their desires for toys. Wish it was me.

You’re going to be spared a lengthy CC today, because I don’t really have a whole lot to go on, except that this baby truck is a pick up version of the Suzuki Jimny SJ 20/LJ80, which was the final iteration of the first Suzuki 4×4, which had its roots a a vehicle called the HopeStar ON360, that Suzuki bought in 1968. That became the Suzuki LJ10, the first of a long line of Suzuki mini-4x4s.

Those early Suzukis were built to the Japanese kei-car standards, and had a 360 cc 2-stroke twin. Eventually, larger two-strokes (539 cc) were on tap, but in 1977 a slightly enlarged SJ20 featured the first four stroke four cylinder engine, an 800cc unit with some 41 hp. That’s what’s likely in this truck.

[update:] This particular truck sports DoD stickers from 1979, which thanks to a TTAC reader the duke means it had a pass to be driven on the base, and not that it was actually owned by the military. Although it certainly would have made a perfect parts runner on an Air Force base or the like.

The little LJ two stroke Suzukis were quite fondly adopted as little off-road toys in Germany, introducing a low-cost option to getting the tires dirty in that country. And of course, the “baby Jeep” has become almost a global icon, being produced in other countries and in various configurations. We of course are familiar with the later Samurai versions, but the Suzuki had spread the LJ and SJ around the world before it finally found a home here in the land of the the one and only Jeep. Perhaps coincidence or not, but our CC Outtake on the Samurai was shot exactly here across the street.

The whole family of these little Suzukis are extremely simple but durable and tough little work horses. I would love to have this one as a hardware store parts runner. Someone beat me to it, and it regularly appears around town. But for best effect, it is seen here with this little Isuzu/Chevy LUV pickup, which really helps put its size (and cuteness) in perspective.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 44 comments
  • Oregon Sage Oregon Sage on Apr 12, 2010

    I used to work at a public University where we had a small fleet of DOT off road only micro vans, and they were bought with that intent. However some of the streets on campus were public streets and the state DMV insisted that we plate them, so we did. Once plated it is no big trick to keep renewing. This used to be common with off-road motorcycles but now states keep lists of legal models and it is becoming virtually impossible to register a bike that was not originally sold for street duty, even if fitted with all the required street equipment.

  • Letanon Letanon on Apr 12, 2010

    Those little Suzukis where sold legally to civilians here in Puerto Rico. New cars sold here must conform with all of the US Federal Government vehicle laws. So they must have conformed with federal regulations somehow or the Federal Government doesn't care so much about what is sold on USA territories. In fact, I have seen here cars that are supposedly for the Canadian market sold legally here. Like for example my first car which I inherited from my dad, a 1987 Nissan Sentra Honeybee. That was a B11 model (1982-1986)that was imported from Mexico and sold as a completely stripper, low cost car, along side the B12 model (1987 - 1991). Those where sold until about 1989. Those cars had the plate that said that they conformed to all of the Federal Government regulations in force for that model year. We also got Pontiac Fireflys (Metro,Swift clone) and other "Canadian" cars. So different laws seems to apply to different parts of the USA and its territories.

    • See 2 previous
    • Porschespeed Porschespeed on Apr 14, 2010

      @letanon, BTW, 'Tis a shame that PR doesn't have Statehood, as it is frequently shortchanged due to it's status. Sorta like the District of Columbia. A couple of guys I went to school with in the US were from PR, as such I did a few spring breaks and holidays enjoying the island. Gorgeous place, and great people, wonderful food. Wish I had the time and spare money to visit more often. I've considered relocating there more than once. My friend's family was one of the very monied types, so perhaps I have a skewed view of what one can get away with if you have the right friends. I know technically that US regs must to be followed, I just remember that the rules were a little more flexible for certain folks.

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next