3 Views
Relive The Much More Tasteful Fifties; Price Unknown
by
Paul Niedermeyer
(IC: employee)
Published: December 18th, 2009
Share
The great thing about cars from seventies is that they make the cars from the fifties look…better. Here’s a nifty concept car from Chrysler, the 1956 (not so) Plainsman. It was Virgil Exner’s take on the wagon, and gave a glimpse of the direction Chrysler’s radical 1957 models would take. And it can be yours! It’s coming to auction on Jan 22. More shots:
Paul Niedermeyer
More by Paul Niedermeyer
Published December 18th, 2009 4:57 PM
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- FreedMike Not my favorite car design, but that blue color is outstanding.
- Lorenzo Car racing is dying, and with it my interest. Midget/micro racing was my last interest in car racing, and now sanctioning body bureaucrats are killing it off too. The more organized it is, the less interesting it becomes.
- Lorenzo Soon, the rental car lots will be filled with Kia's as far as the eye can see!
- Lorenzo You can't sell an old man's car to a young man, but you CAN sell a young man's car to an old man (pardon the sexism, it's not my quote).Solution: Young man styling, but old man amenities, hidden if necessary, like easier entry/exit (young men gradually turn into old men, and will appreciate them).
- Wjtinfwb Hmmm. Given that most Ford designs are doing relatively well in the marketplace, if this was forced I'd bet it was over the S650 Mustang. It's not a bad looking car but some angles seem very derivative of other makes, never a good trait for a car as distinctive as Mustang. And if he had anything to do with the abysmal dashboard, that's reason enough. Mustang doesn't need the "Tokyo by Night" dash arrangement of a more boring car. Analog gauges, a screen big enough for GPS, not Netflix and some decent quality plastics is plenty. The current set-up would be enough to dissuade me from considering a new Mustang.
Comments
Join the conversation
Holy Schnikes - a two-door full-size wagon! Does the tranny selector reside somewhere between the jet engine throttle controls and the afterburner switches? From Wikipedia: "The name Dagmar Bumpers (and Dagmars) was a direct reference to Dagmar (born Virginia Ruth Egnor) [1] the early 1950s television personality who was as well known for her pronounced cleavage as she was for her dumb blonde character on the program Broadway Open House. Dagmar's physical attributes were further enhanced by low-cut gowns and the shape of her bra cups, which were somewhat conical. Egnor was amused by the tribute." Thanks TTAC's B&B, I learned something on my day off!
I believe that this was badged the Plymouth Plainsman at the time. Plymouth had been the first with an all-steel passenger car station wagon after the war. (The Willys Jeepster was actually the first all-steel wagon, but in those days it was considered a Jeep first and a car second, and suburbanites did not want to drive around in a Jeep. How times change...) While Ford led in total wagon sales in the 1950s, by the late 1950s, Plymouth generally led in percentage of passenger cars sales that were wagons. If I recall correctly, the Plainsman featured the spare tire stowed underneath the passenger-side fender on the OUTSIDE of the car. A metal panel was removed to gain access to the tire. This got the spare out of the car, and allowed for the installation of the rear-facing third seat - a feature offered on the 1957 Plymouth wagons. I also believe that, for 1957, all Chrysler Corporation wagons shared the same basic wheelbase and body, with divisional distinctions maintained through different front clips and taillights. This saved money and allowed Plymouth to brag in its advertising that it offered the biggest wagon of the low-price three (a big selling point in the 1950s).