Volt Birth Watch 165: Audi Prez: Tesla Another "Car for Idiots" (If You Know What He Means)

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

“Audi of America President asserts that sustainable technologies, not ‘silver bullets,’ will drive automotive progress.” And there you have it: President Johan de Nysschen public clarification re: widely disseminated reports that he called the U.S. taxpayer-supported Hail Mary-shaped plug-in electric/gas hybrid Chevrolet Volt “a car for idiots.” [Press release after the jump.] Clearly, de Nysschen has only slightly modified his central contention; I guess he meant to say the Volt is built by idiots for intelligent people. And then the VW suit picked-up the phone to hash it out with Volt Kool-Aid purveyor Lyle Denis over at gm-volt.com. The Audi Prez tickled his tonsils with his other foot. “’I don’t think the Volt is a car for idiots,’ he said. He claimed the headline was a journalist’s misinterpretation, and that his point was that the Volt was ‘an idiotic business case,’ and not how he would refer to people. ‘We might as well have been taking about the Tesla,’ he said.” Oh, dear.

HERNDON, Va., Sep 8, 2009 – Finding practical ways to reduce automotive emissions and lessen America’s energy dependence isn’t something that can wait for technological breakthroughs years down the road, noted Audi of America President Johan de Nysschen. Instead, car companies and government policy makers should immediately embrace promising new technologies that can quickly add up to make a real difference. In a wide-reaching speech at Audi’s 100th Anniversary celebration in Sonoma, California, de Nysschen also discussed his thoughts on the future of luxury, asserting that the era of “legacy luxury” –products that convey status without regard to cost or resources consumed – is now at the end of its life cycle, with Audi representing the new era of “progressive luxury.”

Addressing journalists gathered to experience the latest Audi models and technologies, de Nysschen affirmed that Audi has an abiding commitment to bring sustainable automotive technologies to the world’s motorways. In particular, he noted several projects that increase the efficiency of existing internal combustion technology and could serve as effective bridges to a future that can deliver solutions to limitations found today on matters such as battery technology, energy production and well-to-wheel environmental impact. These technologies ensure that Audi will be the standard bearer of progressive luxury and the modern automotive industry.

Specifically, de Nysschen discussed the company’s clean diesel TDI engines which drastically reduce the need for petroleum products, light aluminum body designs, vibration dampeners to ensure the car effectively uses all energy it develops and smaller, high-performance engines that require less fuel to perform. Together, these systems ensure that the automotive industry will maintain until the next generation technology is more viable.

“Yes, we spend a lot of time ensuring that our owners drive something better,” said de Nysschen. “We and our consumers also want to drive at something better – a more sustainable future.”

Intrinsically tied to these sustainable developments, de Nysschen argued, is the need for the old concept of luxury to “recede into the rearview mirror” in favor of the “progressive luxury” that Audi strives to represent. He acknowledged that people of means will reward themselves for hard work with status symbols, but that those purchases must square “with the ethos of an era that has been called the end of excess.” To that end, Audi is providing products that are considerately-crafted inside and out – demonstrative of success without excess.

“This is the type of luxury that announces itself in aggregate. Everything just feels flawless, inside and out,” de Nysschen said. “You realize (that) when you get into an Audi, it’s not only the engine that moves you.”

Among the key quotes from Mr. de Nysschen’s speech (which is available in its entirety at www.audiusanews.com):

• We are thinking of a leadership position in terms of centuries, and so we must ask (questions about the sustainability of the industry), and answer them.

• As Audi enters our second century, we are answering these questions simultaneously – defining the future of luxury by redefining the future itself, to be more sustainable, more beautiful, and more progressive than ever before.

• When you look at the vehicles that defined luxury for the last several decades, you see size for the sake of size. Symbols for the sake of status. Aggressiveness bordering on arrogance. A “relentless pursuit of perfection” that somehow forgot about passion. How boring. These are all remnants of an automotive landscape that is fast receding into the rearview mirror. Progressive Luxury is what we see when we look through the windshield.

• We and our consumers also want to drive at something better – a more sustainable future.

• In pursuing sustainability, there’s no silver bullet.

• The challenge is that Americans, by and large, haven’t quite been willing to put their consumerism where their conscience is – sales of small cars have declined more than the average decline of all segments, meaning that sales are still migrating to small and medium size SUVs.

• The truly sustainable solution is to give today’s consumer a much more efficient version of what they already want – whether that’s performance, space, fine finishes, or all of the above.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Luke42 Luke42 on Sep 08, 2009

    Autosavant: The word I used was "possibilities", not "certainties". The "contradictions" that you point out come from several assumptions about things that I didn't say, including the assumption that these "possibilities" both happen, and happen in a particular order. I'd be happy to explain my worldview over a beer. Bud Light if necessary, but I prefer Guinness. The truth is that I don't know what the future holds -- and I sleep fine knowing that. But I'm an adaptable sort.

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Sep 09, 2009

    Author: Luke42 Comment: Autosavant: The word I used was "possibilities", not "certainties". The "contradictions" that you point out come from several assumptions about things that I didn't say. " No, they came from a statement you did write, the one that included both global warming and an alleged "peak oil" shortage together. My point is that one of the two would logically neutralize the other, and vice versa. "I'd be happy to explain my worldview over a beer. Bud light if necessary, but I prefer Guinness." My preference too. If a 12-yr scotch or better is not available. "The truth is that I don't know what the future holds -- and I sleep fine knowing that." You are very correct here, on both counts. Nobody knows, even the CEOS and the experts, and nobody could POSSIBLY know. And because there is little you can do worrying about what you do not know, it makes sense to sleep well. This is exactly what bugs me about the peak oil crowd (that seems to pop up mostly when prices rise, and hide when they inevitably fall... LOL. They know even less than we do, and in place of knowledge, they offer conspiracy theories, such as, why don't the Saudis let us look at their State Secrets. DUH, Peak oilers, exactly because they ARE state secrets! If I was the Saudi Oil Mimister, I'd not show you one word, let alone one page, of my Reserves and production extimates.

  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next