Quote of the Day: "It's Just Really Good to Be Back in the Car Business"
Daniel Howes’ column for the Detroit News is based on an interview with GM CEO Fritz Henderson, while the latter was embarked on a national dealer handholding tour [your name suggestions below]. And here’s the first money shot: “It’s just really good to be back in the car business.” Howes reads TTAC; I’ve taken him to task many times for his transformation from kick-ass European correspondent to Motown pom-pom waver and, at best, chronic fence sitter. “Now, before all the cynics glom on to that single sentence as proof — proof, I tell you — that GM’s leadership is back to the bad ol’ days of denial, I’d offer this: There is more that’s changing inside GM today than staying the same, starting with the fact that the CEO and key leaders of his management team spend a whole lot more time talking about cars and trucks than the nonautomotive headache du jour.” This is all kinds of wrong.
Why would Howes think that Henderson’s statement indicates traditional Detroit denial? It has nothing to do with denial, which is, as we know, Maximum Bob Lutz’s bailiwick. In fact, the jefe’s comment raises entirely different, equally important questions.
Given that Henderson is a GM lifer—former GM CEO Rick Wagoner’s clone and hand-picked successor—what the hell was Henderson doing until now? What business was he in, exactly?
Unless he’s talking about Henderson’s love life or golf game, Howes’ “nonautomotive headache du jour” remark assumes there’s a separation between the business of GM (securing a mega-suckle on the taxpayer teat, protecting executives from defenestration and salary cuts, fucking around with Opel, etc.) and cars and trucks (building cars and trucks, selling them). To paraphrase the B52’s, “WELL THERE ISN’T!”
I get that Howes thinks GM is more product-oriented these days. But the chaos that is GM’s branding strategy, on-again-off-again model development and mislaid marketing plans (now where did I put that truck month?) continues apace. As they say, talk is cheap. Unless it costs $100 billion dollars of my tax money. Anyway . . .
I reckon Howes got the Hendersonian subtext right. The word “just” indicates that the CEO is losing his stomach for politics. You can almost here the sigh in his voice. Which is not a good thing considering Henderson works for the United States government [see: above].
Ironically enough, Danny provides us proof of Henderson’s ongoing inability to face market reality elsewhere in his opus.
“A consistent theme is, ‘Let’s go on the offense,’ ” [Henderson] said. [The dealers] like that GM has worked its inventories down to historic levels; that the next products hitting showrooms are competitive (or better) than the best in their segments; that the beginnings of a marketing campaign (designed in some 30 days, unheard of for GM) is featuring the products and standing up for its attributes.
Quick: which GM products—current or forthcoming—are better than their competition? (Maybe that’s why Howes mixed-up his pronouns.) And is it me or does this sound like the same old punch-the-fist-in-the-air-like-you-just-don’t-care GM?
I’m not suggesting the nationalized automaker should play defense, because that would make too much sense, obviously. When your market share is disappearing, you attack! Right? Screw defending what you already have. Faster, Pussycat! Sell! Sell! Sell!
Hey an all-attack all-the-time strategy worked for Winston Churchill. Oh wait, the wartime PM secured Britain’s defenses first. And he had a little help in the attacking department from the Russians and the Americans. Anyway, it seems that Howes loves Winnie, even if he hasn’t studied the Anglo-American’s military leadership.
Churchill: “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”
Howes: “It’s a start that is far from the end. The next few months are all about GM solidifying its bottom in the United States and rebuilding relationships with employees, dealers, suppliers, customers, a skeptical financial community and even the government, whose take on GM’s chances for success is the short side of a slam dunk.”
Farago: “GM is a zombie. A dead automaker walking. Chapter 7 is only a bailout or two away. Deal with it.”
More by Robert Farago
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- THX1136 That's so cool. This one is close to what I had accumulated with the 84 Shelby Charger I owned. Since it only had a 5 digit odo no one would know it had over 406k. I kept track of everyplace it turned over with only 2 still lodged in my 71 yo brain. If I had taken care of it cosmetically as well as I did mechanically I still think I could have gotten to 500k which was a goal I set for myself. The Toyota mentioned is quite impressive at over 900k. Thanks for the write up, Murilee!
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Nice to see. I like the Top 10 list and seeing "80s Mercedes" within.
- Redapple2 jeffbut they (gm) dont want to ... their (gm ) pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. (gm has )More truck profit than the other 3 (manufacturers (ford, ram , toyota)). (The combined sales of ) Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = (yields ) 2x ford total (profit from trucks) @ $15,000 profit per. (therefore gm has )Tons of $ (money ) to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire. (expound / corrections )
- UnoGeeks Great information. Unogeeks is the top SAP ABAP Training Institute, which provides the best SAP ABAP Training
- ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
Comments
Join the conversation