DC: Camera Ticket Overturned Over Accuracy Doubts
Doubts over the accuracy of the speed camera equipment led to the dismissal of a Washington, DC photo radar ticket last month. On May 7, a 34-year-old engineer from Alexandria, Virginia had been driving on Interstate 295/395 near 9th Street on a sunny morning when a mobile speed camera operated by American Traffic Solutions snapped a photo of the engineer’s car. The camera claimed that the Audi was traveling at 51 MPH, 11 MPH over the District’s 40 MPH interstate speed limit.
The motorist, who requested anonymity, decided to fight the citation out of “spite.” He arrived at the District’s Department of Motor Vehicles on August 17 unprepared with an argument that would beat the ticket. He fully expected to lose, but thought it was right to “cost the city more money” because he saw the photo radar program as little more than an illegitimate money grab. The motorist was surprised, however, when Adjudicator Stephen Reichert took one look at the ticket photo and noted that a second vehicle had been within the radar’s field of view. Radar guidelines suggest this situation could cause a spurious radar reading, especially since the District’s contractor provided no video or other secondary verification of speed. View full-size photo.
“Inasmuch as the government-submitted photograph shows multiple vehicles traveling through the radar zone in a receding direction, the government has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that respondent’s vehicle was identified as the vehicle speeding,” Reichert wrote. “Thus the ticket is dismissed.”
The motorist was glad he did not need to give the speech against the system that he had planned to give.
“I said ‘no’ when asked if I had anything else to add, and out I went with my cash remaining in my pocket,” the motorist told TheNewspaper. “Cost to me: $3.30 in Metro fares. Win.”
As of last month, the District’s private photo enforcement contractors had mailed a total of 4,019,023 tickets worth a total of $305 million. That is equivalent to one ticket not just for every resident of Washington, DC, but for every single resident of the District plus surrounding Virginia and Maryland suburbs.
A copy of the adjudicator’s decision is available in a 250k PDF file at the source link below.
Department of Motor Vehicles Hearing Record (Government of the District of Columbia, 8/17/2009)
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Big Wheel The Mk8 is NOT the generation to have.I'm the second owner of a MK7 2021 GTI, purchased in 2022. As others have said, great car, fun to drive. We were so lucky to find the perfect spec we wanted. We didn't want an MK8 because they were too new at the time, & had the blasted haptic/touch buttons everywhere. Plus the huge tacked on screen. So we wanted one close to or at the end of the MK7 run. White exterior color due to the Florida sun (even though it's in a garage most of the time). Base S trim with the must have plaid cloth seats. No sunroof. Real hard buttons on the steering wheel make controlling the radio & other items a breeze. Three round HVAC dials as God intended. Just a small touchscreen, but fully integrated into the dash, that we don't use anyway. And of course the six speed manual, topped with the golf ball dimpled shift knob. My youngest son learned to drive on it, & loves it more than anything (he's got several GTI posters on his bedroom wall). I think he's going to have it for many many years. Only 38,000 miles on it now, & no issues (knock on wood). I'm aware of the water pump issue & I think ignition coils are also a sore spot for these engines. Keeping my fingers crossed. Put a set of Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 tires on it 2 years ago, with Enkei rims. Love it.
- Buickman Classic Buzz Kill
- Lorenzo The 1970s! When mid-size cars of the late 1960s became full size coupes just by getting a couple inches wider, and a foot and a half longer, on the same wheelbase. But the interiors were marvelous, compared to what came before.It's just as well neither of the optional engines were chosen, since the old Cruise-O-Matic was the only transmission option. OTOH, that extra width and length added hundreds of pounds of curb weight, adding to the sluggish performance. Having lived through the 1970s, I could not understand why cars were getting bigger, while engines were becoming less powerful (and not just because of the switch to net horsepower) while gasoline prices were going up, and octane ratings were going down.Then again, you would be hard pressed to find interiors with such luxury touches today, especially color choices. This is a good example of a lot of sheet metal moving slowly while the driver sits in the lap of luxury, later to be rendered junkyard fodder when parking spaces everywhere were downsized.
- Redapple2 flawed product. from the jump
- Parkave231 The shot of the climate controls (well, the whole interior, really) brought back memories of my dad's '74 Ranchero 500. Little five-year-old me couldn't comprehend why there was a place for a rear window switch...and yet the rear window in dad's Ranchero didn't go down.
Comments
Join the conversation
June 2010 Received a dismissal letter :)
Nice, well done, Dave. After 20 years of speeding ticket-less driving, DC has sent me an 11 over in a 40. Photo is eerily similar to yours. In the spirit of the 6th amendment, I am going to attempt adjudication, as well.