Bailout Watch 574: President Obama on Chrysler, GM Bailouts: "We'll Get Our Money Back"

by Robert Farago

Published: July 30th, 2009

bailout watch 574 president obama on chrysler gm bailouts we ll get our money

Words are cheap. Detroit bailouts are expensive; the feds have spent more than $100 billion on the Motown meltdown. But don’t worry. Be happy. According to Reuters, “President Barack Obama said on Wednesday that General Motors and Chrysler Group were companies worth saving, but he expects both to repay their government loans.” But? The Prez made his prediction to celebrate the latest stats from the car buyers’ bailout (a.k.a. Cash-for-Clunkers or C.A.R.S. program). Even Reuters isn’t buying that one—much. Apparently, it’s all about the mix. “The impact on GM, Chrysler and Ford Motor was not immediately clear with passenger car sales outpacing those of pickups and sport utilities.” Translation: the Big Three need pickup and SUV sales to survive. Fair dinkum, albeit on a very, very small scale in this case. It gets better/worse . . .

“If GM and Chrysler were willing to do what was necessary to make themselves competitive and if taxpayers were repaid every dime they put on the line, it was a process worth supporting,” Obama said in Raleigh, North Carolina.

“We saved hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result and expect to get our money back.”

Funny, I thought the bailout helped Chrysler and GM cut jobs. Oh wait; I remember: the federal money allowed them to cut jobs with big buyout packages, paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. No, that’s not it. I mean it is, but ALL those jobs would have disappeared completely without the bailout. Right? Total economic catastrophe. That kind of thing.

As much as I like the word “if” (it’s so much more realistic than “Yes we can!”), three questions. First, who decided “what was necessary”? Second, how much faith do we have in them? And third, what are the odds the automakers will repay every dime “invested” Chrysler and GM?

Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 15 comments

PeteMoran on Jul 30, 2009

With "The Rat" Rattner standing in that pic and what I thought was a scuba tank to the right, I assumed all those people were REALLY short....

Like Reply
U mad scientist on Jul 31, 2009
This is what we get for electing a president who has NO knowledge of economics. Has he ever said one word or made one decision to make you think otherwise? That's particularly cute coming from people who've demonstrably NEVER taken an econ class (or even read the entry on wikipedia for that matte). If there's to be serious criticism of the pres, and not cheap pot shots, it's going to be how our political process is systematically beholden to the interests of the wealthy over the interests of the little people. Notice how when a worker who actually produces something worthwhile gets tens of thousands of dollars, it's political pandemonium, and when goldman pays out hundreds of thousands to the paper pushers who creates the mess, nobody questions the people who bring about the kind of fake wealth that leeches off everyone else. - Currently, Chairman Hu Jintao is less of a dictator in China than Obama is one in the US. That's funny. Really, no one else plays in the big leagues of massive corruption like the chinese communist party. Do you think ANYONE in that cabal stands a chance, however minute, of getting elected?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

UnoGeeks Great information. Unogeeks is the top SAP ABAP Training Institute, which provides the best SAP ABAP Training
ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.