Capsule Review: 2009 Volkswagen Passat CC 2.0T (Manual)

Mike Solowiow
by Mike Solowiow

I love the way the Volkswagen CC looks. It’s a perfectly proportioned pastiche of everything I admire about BMW, Mercedes and Audi design. The CC is as handsome as the priced-to-fail Phaeton, only more so. Inside, the seats alone are worth the price of admission: firm yet endlessly supportive. The CC’s toy count is high, the price affordable. And, yet, something’s missing. Other than reliability. It’s that vital mojo that makes the Jaguar XF such a joy to behold, and the Mercedes-Benz CLS the ultimate boulevardier. Let’s call it . . . an automatic gearbox.

Quick aside: I am a purist. I will buy my cars with a manual gearbox until the last stick operated automobile is dead and buried, or they pry the gear lever from my cold, hard, smashed-into-the-Armco barrier hands. [ED: dead men don’t buy cars.] There are plenty of reasons why Europeans buy manual transmissions at more than twice the rate of their American counterparts. I like to think driving pleasure is foremost amongst them. Of course, that’s only wishful thinking. And for those Americans who long for big stick shift cars like, say, the manual version of the Passat CC, here’s news: it’s like Captain Kirk wearing a girdle. It’s wrong on more levels than a 3D chess game gone bad.

Changing gears, heel-n-toeing, trying to maximize the sporty appeal of the Passat CC on the back roads of Deutschland just didn’t work out. The car was like a one-legged supermodel trying to dance (ask Paul McCartney how that turned out). The CC’s steering was a tad too light; the massive car resisted changes in direction. Equally unsettling: the sedan’s swoopy styling left blind spots that hid Fiat Pandas. At 220 kmh in the Passat CC, darting around in the crosswinds, I finally learned a lesson that our Best and Brightest probably forgot in their sleep: manuals have their place. Big cars and stick shifts don’t mix.

The CC was designed for a driver ready to enjoy the joys of sitting back, flipping their fingers on the paddle-shifted six-speed automatic, and cruising quickly, not frenetically. If they’re feeling slightly rambunctious, they can find a nice little backroad and push the CC just enough to not spill their cup of espresso from the corner bread store. And when they’re done seeing the sights, they can cruise to the autobahn/highway, slam the accelerator/switch on the radar detector, and let the car do its thing.

VW offers a manual equipped Passat CC in North America. Huh? Americans are manual aversive, save a few diehards. To offer a stick in a car so clearly designed to have an automatic may satisfy the purists, but it probably won’t. Not if they know what’s good for them.

Mike Solowiow
Mike Solowiow

More by Mike Solowiow

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Banker43 Banker43 on Jun 18, 2009

    I am late to comment here, but i have to say that the 2.0T combined with the 6 speed manual is a great drive. The CC, despite it's long looks, is based on the Golf/Jetta platform, so I don't really get the beef here.

  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Jul 09, 2010

    Germans seem to have a lot of pride in their brands... that is the only reason someone could explain to me why they willingly pay exhorbitant premiums for bargain basement Benzes over equally competent other cars. And I agree with the premise of the article... it would be strange for the CLS to come with a stickshift, no matter how good the box was. Stickshifts are reserved for econo cars, sports cars, and everything within that range (i.e. sports sedans etc).

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next