Is AN Picking On Toyota?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The mainstream media has finally discovered that America’s Motown-based automakers are in dire straits. (Was it the bailouts?) The Detroit-based automotive media are in full counter-insurgency mode, scouring the autoblogosphere for stories that say “SEE! They’re in trouble, too!” When Toyota recently secured bank financing, cries of “Bailout! Bailout!” echoed throughout the Motor City. And now Automotive News [sub] seizes on the Automotive Lease Guide’s [ALG] revised depreciation stats for proof that GM and ChryCo are not alone. “Toyota’s residuals take a dive” AN’s headline proclaims. “Not only are Toyota Division’s new-vehicle sales plunging, but so are residual values on its used cars and trucks. That is depriving Toyota of one of its best marketing tools: the healthy residuals the brand long has been able to brag about.” Uh-oh. Hang on. Context?

Of course, it is an industry-wide trend. According to the guide, 2006 model vehicles with leases that ended in January and February retained an average value of 40 percent of their sticker prices. That is 6 percentage points lower than the original projection.

So . . . let’s bash Toyota! The above illustration illustrates the bias. While the difference between ALG’s forecast for the Toyota Tundra’s residual value and its actual 2009 value is greater than the same discrepancy for the Silverado and F-150, the bottom line clearly puts the Tundra at the top. Actual value vs. actual value, it’s Toyota (40.1 percent), Silverado (39.8 percent) and F-150 (32.2 percent). In fact, doesn’t the “value decline” illustrate nothing more than ALG’s lack of forecasting ability?

Hopping over to ALG’s website, an entirely different picture emerges. Toyota’s Camry, Prius, RAV4 and Tacoma all get a five-star depreciation rating. GM has no five-star vehicles. Nor does Chrysler. Nor Ford. The only American vehicles that make the grade are the Jeep Wrangler and the Dodge Viper; the latter of which which Chrysler is deep-sixing. On the downside, domestics account for 15 of the 25 one-star rated cars.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • KixStart KixStart on Mar 17, 2009

    golden2husky: "How about the “import only” people who dismiss a well rated domestic car without even looking at it because their 1983 Citation sucked?" 1. Go look at the survey... there's far fewer of those than there are people who simply won't consider an Asian car "because they don't want an Asian car." 2. And I guess this means GM shouldn't have built '83 Citations that sucked. Business 101... it's easier to keep a customer than win him back. Think GM has learned that lesson? If so, did you read about "defender's" travails with his Tahoe hybrid's brakes (earlier TTAC article)? And how a GM buyback is just another opportunity to screw the customer?

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Mar 19, 2009

    [...] Is AN Picking On Toyota? | The Truth About Cars [...]

  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic A great opportunity for an auto maker (Toyota) who’s behind the curve in EV development. Fisker would be the Leading Edge division with trickle down technology to the other divisions as EVs eventually become mandatory.
  • Jalop1991 ES500eToo close to Fiat there, guy.
Next