Toyota Avalon Review

Justin Berkowitz
by Justin Berkowitz

The last time Toyota sold sex-on-wheels it came arrived in the form of the flying flagship known as the Supra. The Supra holstered an inline six with twin turbos sending over 300 horses to the rear wheels (335i anyone?). But Toyota’s mid-market meteorologists knew which way the wind was blowing. So they sent their one trick pony car back to the factory to be made into rubber and glue. Now Toyota has two flagships with the combined excitement of rubber and glue: the granola Prius and the grandpa Avalon.

Honestly, I love boulevardiers. Big power and cushy seats speak to my inner geezer. Why speed when you can waft? So I approached my Avalon XLS tester with all the anticipation of a Boca Raton resident about to sample a new early bird special from a dog-eared deli menu. As for appearance, well, normally I’d say a car’s looks are subjective. But when it comes to the Avalon’s sheetmetal, I don’t have an opinion.

OK; it looks like a fat Camry. Cancel my pistonhead street cred card, but I like the way the Toyota Camry looks. Unfortunately, this full figured version loses some of the Camry’s interesting features. OK, it ditches ALL of the Camry’s interesting features– save the one they SHOULD have deep-sixed: the Bangle butt.

Taken as a whole, the Avalon left me thinking about marshmallows– which is good if you’re holding hot chocolate and graham crackers at a camp site, not so good if you’re a car buyer who appreciates a finely turned fender. Not that the average Avalon buyer allows such lascivious thoughts into their heads, God forbid.

Strangely, the interior doesn’t reflect this blander-is-better ideology. Instead, Toyota’s designers opted for a thoroughly modern motif. Oh, that definition only applies if you consider giant sheets of matte-finished silver plastic the latest word in contemporary styling. For me, it’s a retro-modern thing; my parents’ ‘88 Nissan Maxima sported a similarly “modern” faux nickelfest. A few years later it looked like someone went crazy with a sandblaster.

I digress. Besides the wannabe metal skin, my tester’s interior was suffused with wannabe wood. To paraphrase the venerable Spice Girls, “If you wannabe my lover, skip the tacky wood trim”. Especially when it’s misaligned from the doors to the dash. Oops.

Ergonomically, the Avalon didn’t challenge my arthritis. Aspiring Starfleet pilots will feel right at home working the space age climate control buttons. As the car’s target market can [vaguely] recall propeller-driven air travel, the Avalon’s translucent buttons are an odd choice. They also bring the dashboard material count to six: fake brushed metal, chrome, wood, translucent rubber and standard plastic. Too much the magic bus.

If you’ve ever driven the Toyota Supra, you’ll know exactly how the Avalon doesn’t drive. The Avalon’s 3.5-liter DOHC 24-valve Dual VVT-i V6 purrs like a tranquilized cat. Although the sedan’s schizophrenically frugal mill (22/31) has enough grunt (268 horses) for brisk straight line acceleration, it ain’t gonna happen. Tip in is more like “ooze in.” Full-bore acceleration is fully boring, sonically speaking.

The Avalon felt a little floaty on the highway. More surprisingly, the car’s suspension isn’t as bump-absorbent as you’d expect– although I’m sure there’s a prescription medication that can eliminate the issue for the Avalon's core clientele. Steering feedback is nonexistent, which abates torque steer, but makes driving a challenge. The process is multifaceted. First, you turn the wheel. Then you look where you’re headed. Then you make corrections. Lather, rinse and repeat.

Avalonistas might be thinking “there goes another adrenalin afflicted car reviewer asking a luxury car to be a sports car.” Not at all. I’m asking the Avalon to be a calm, confident and relaxed cruiser. You know: a proper luxury car. Aside from that fact that the Avalon is crammed with all the high tech gadgets that old people most buyers will never be able to operate, the sedan lacks that luxurious X-factor that makes you go “ahhhh”– instead of “I wonder if we’re having leftover pot roast for dinner.”

When the first generation Avalon was introduced, those in the know dismissed it as nothing more than a bigger Camry. Well, nothing’s changed. Which leaves me wondering: why would anyone buy an Avalon? For around $4k less, you can get the better looking, better driving Camry with nearly all the same features. You can buy a Hell of a lot of Metamucil with that kind of money.

By the same token, if you’re really in the mood to blow 35 large on a front wheel-drive Toyota sedan, why not move on up to a Lexus ES350? It looks better, snobs better (think higher resale value) and the Lexus dealership treats you like Mr. Big Shot Moneybags. Huh. And here I was thinking Toyota had ditched performance to be the sensible brand.

Justin Berkowitz
Justin Berkowitz

Immensely bored law student. I've also got 3 dogs.

More by Justin Berkowitz

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 70 comments
  • Silverkris Silverkris on May 02, 2008

    wes1337 said: "Avalon with all of its strong points has one other inexcusable failing. The interior trunk design gets a grade of F because of crude projections hanging from the ceiling and clumsy hinges all robbing practical space for suitcases or other box shaped items." Yes, that's my biggest concern with the Avalon...its trunk isn't all that large as other cars in its class (no bigger than the Camry in volume), and it doesn't have split fold-down rear seats. Otherwise, I think it's a pretty nice car for what it does...

  • Romanjetfighter Romanjetfighter on Jun 29, 2008

    How does this fat pig get 22/31 MPG with 268 HP and a 5-speed auto when my 158 HP Camry gets 21/31? Pbbt.

  • JLGOLDEN Enormous competition is working against any brand in the fight for "luxury" validation. It gets murky for Cadillac's image when Chevy, Buick, and GMC models keep moving up the luxury features (and price) scale. I think Cadillac needs more consistency with square, crisp designs...even at the expense of aerodynamics and optimized efficiency. Reintroduce names such as DeVille, Seville, El Dorado if you want to create a stir.
  • ClipTheApex I don't understand all of the negativity from folks on this forum regarding Europeans. Having visited the EU multiple times across different countries, I find they are very much like us in North America-- not as different as politicians like to present them. They all aren't liberal "weenies." They are very much like you and me. Unless you've travelled there and engaged with them, it's easy to digest and repeat what we hear. I wish more Americans would travel abroad. When they return, they will have a different view of America. We are not as perfect or special as we like to believe. And no, many Europeans don't look up to America. Quite the opposite, actually.
  • Dwford Let's face it, Cadillac is planning minimal investment in the current ICE products. Their plan is to muddle through until the transition to full EV is complete. The best you are going to get is one more generation of ICE vehicles built on the existing platforms. What should Cadillac do going forward? No more vehicles under $50k. No more compact vehicles. Rely on Buick for that. Many people here mention Genesis. Genesis doesn't sell a small sedan, and they don't sell a small crossover. They sell midsize and above. So should Cadillac.
  • EBFlex Sorry BP. They aren’t any gaps
  • Bd2 To sum up my comments and follow-up comments here backed by some data, perhaps Cadillac should look to the Genesis formula in order to secure a more competitive position in the market. Indeed, by using bespoke Rwd chassis, powertrains and interiors Genesis is selling neck and neck with Lexus while ATPs are 15 to 35% higher depending on the segment you are looking at. While Lexus can't sell Rwd sedans, Genesis is outpacing them 2.2 to 1.Genesis is an industry world changing success story, frankly Cadillac would be insane to not replicate it for themselves.
Next