Ford Focus ZX4 SES Review
At least it’s packaged nicely. Ford’s second generation Escort-killer employs the same tall ‘n boxy design motif as its larger brother, the slow selling (or is that just slow?) Five Hundred. True, both cars could use a bold, Fusion-style makeover. But the Focus got the better end of the deal. While its diminutive size keeps the cute, the Focus’ sheetmetal radiates a bit of sporting intent– especially when viewed head on. The Focus’ flared fenders look the biz. Its butt-in-the-air stance doesn’t. Nor does the wannabe spoiler perched above the trunk. The aerodynamic addendum is a functionally useless throwback to a stupider time that gives the Focus Lamborghini-like rearward visibility. Forget parallel parking; you can’t even scope out hot chicks at stop lights.
Luckily, I got the Focus out of traffic and found some corners. Suddenly, I noticed that the steering wheel is fantastic. Fat, tiny, firm yet soft– I mean, it’s perfect. While the arm rest was probably skinned with Chinese political dissidents, (whatever is cheapest), it’s ideally positioned. There’s also a groove in the door for your left arm, complete with a grab handle, that’s wonderfully cosseting. It turns out Ford employed a driver– not a cost-cutting committee (with decontented engineers) — to design the really important bits.
Once underway, the Focus remains planted and focused– its well-sorted MacPherson (front) and SLA (rear) independent suspension (hear that, Mr. Mustang?) dismisses bumps and stifles lean. And then there’s a band between 75 and 85mph where things go all wobbly; the Focus inexplicably loses its "carma." Oddly, above 85mph the Focus returns you to normal programming. Warning! Do not take a Focus above 85mph. Around town the anchors do a worthy job of reining-in whatever speed you manage to eke out. On the highway… when some Scion-driving reprobate cut me off, I kicked hard and thought I was dead. Not that the brakes didn’t grab. They grabbed alright, but the Focus started convulsing, as the rear drums struggled. Wrong answer.
[Ford provided the vehicle reviewed, taxes, insurance and a full tank of gas.]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
- MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
- 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
- MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
- 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Comments
Join the conversation
Of course it makes sense for me to "put down the Focus." I'm not ignorant at all, I'm college educated, with three degrees, and furthermore (and to the point), I've had the car more than three and a half years, and after all the trouble I've had with this car, believe me I have earned the right to say whatever I damn well please about the Focus. It's a love/hate relationship, and a lot of Focus owners feel that way the longer they own their vehicle. The only thing that's "stupid" is people who blindly support a brand or product - because I own a Focus myself I'm supposed to support the Focus no matter what? And BTW, since we're all going off on an ST tangent, myself included, let us not forget the car reviewed was an SES, not the ST. IMO, the ST is the only current U.S. Focus that's even worth considering. The rest is mediocre. And even the ST is really nothing to lose sleep over. You guys who keep talking about "I can mod this, and mod that, and have xxx amount of horsepower" are forgetting that the VAST MAJORITY of buyers are never going to engage in that kind of activity, they are looking for the complete package from the factory, and the Focus is really falling behind in that category. But, just to follow your argument, I guess you think only the U.S. model ST can be modded? If Ford sold the Mk. II here complete with a turbocharged engine, you couldn't mod that? Because modding a turbo engine is going to net you a lot more gains that pushing what you can out of the 2.3 Duratec.
A second generation US-Focus = Mazda 3 or Volvo S40/V50. The generation gap can be felt in the thickness of your wallet. If you want a better car you just have to pay more money, something americans seem reluctant to do.