The August Scare

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

A press release, issued last night by Edmunds, had a devastating effect on Toyota. As the Tokyo bourse opened, the TMC share sunk to a fresh year-to-date low of 2,890 yen. In the afternoon session, it recovered a bit, but not much, to close at 2,941 yen. Ooops. In the beginning of the year, the ToMoCo share traded above 4000. What were the horrible news?

Edmunds forecasts that August U.S. sales will be a big downer. 17.7 percent below August 2009. Waitaminute, will you say, wasn’t August 2009 cash for clunkers month? Sure was.

“Comparing to last August is not meaningful since Cash for Clunkers distorted the market so badly last year,” said Jessica Caldwell at Edmunds. “It is likely that the current slow sales pace can be partly attributed to the thousands of ‘pull-ahead’ sales that last year’s CARS program stole from subsequent months.”

But there is another bit of bad news. Japanese car makers will do much worse in August, says Edmund’s crystal ball. They see Honda at -27.6 percent, Nissan at -26.5 percent. Toyota is seen dropping by a whopping 28.3 percent.

Amongst the U.S. makers, Edmunds sees GM shrinking by 23.1 percent, Ford by 10.5 percent. Chrysler is seen increasing by 7.3 percent.

If it would only be August that is distorted by cash for clunkers, it would be a non-event. However, there is that nasty “uncertainty about the U.S. economic outlook in response to falling near-term economic gauges,” as The Nikkei [sub] puts it. Matters are made worse for Japanese automakers by “the yen’s appreciation to the lower-84 level against the dollar.”

If you think that’s only a Japanese predicament, think again. Edmunds predict that August’s Seasonally Adjusted Annualized Rate (SAAR) will be 11.8 million, up a bit from 11.5 in July 2010. Don’t expect a whole lot more anytime soon.

Says Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Karl Brauer: “Based on the pattern of previous recessions, new car sales should have recovered 71 percent from 2009’s low point, delivering a SAAR of 16.6 million units by this June. However, not this time — and the same factors depressing the recovery in auto sales over the past year are likely to continue for the foreseeable future, keeping sales in the 12-million unit range even through next year. “

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 28, 2010

    That GM IPO is gonna wait a long time.

  • Peter Aiello Peter Aiello on Aug 29, 2010

    Toyota has been replacing the frames in those First gen Tundras. Bad rust proofing is to blame I believe. My friend considered getting his replaced. there are holes in the frame big enough to fit your finger through. But he just decided to replace the truck. with a chrysler. *gag*

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next