Car Auction Collapse Claims Kruse

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Following on from Honda’s loss of Facebook over the Crosstour—or loss of Crosstour over the Facebook— here’s another story where the web pulls the rug from under auto industry types seeking to hide the truth. We’ve been saying it forever (in Internet terms): the collector car market has collapsed. Well, duh. But the mainstream media and specialist press has both been happy to perpetuate the myth perpetuated by the auction houses that their business has been defying gravity. See? Cars are selling for phenomenal prices! Meanwhile, Hagerty’s CARS THAT MATTER (must do, given the shift lock situation) is telling readers to pay attention to the men behind the curtain.

To wit: in an email to subs, the price guide outs an ailing auction house: “The half-empty parking lots of Kruse Auction Park hint at the real story: According to the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, Kruse faces legal actions in excess of $16 million. It seems that the various companies that make up the Kruse empire have had some trouble paying their bills, including the mortgage on the auction facility, American Express charges, and other loans. Perhaps more disconcerting to car collectors is that Kruse’s many creditors reportedly include over 60 sellers who have yet to be paid for vehicles that were auctioned.” It gets worse.

In his defense, company patriarch Dean Kruse told the Fort WayneNews-Sentinel that he is owed some $6.5 million from previous auctions and just needs to generate some revenue this weekend to keep the wolves at bay. Indeed, the Labor Day weekend proceeds are subject to court garnishment in order to pay the mortgage lender. Clearly, Kruse needs a great sale, however unlikely that may be. As of Saturday morning, the Kruse Web site lists 1,749 vehicles in its online catalog, far shy of a typically inflated claim of “5,000 cars.” Firsthand observations confirm a sparse staging area, and few truly marquee automobiles. To make money as an auctioneer you don’t necessarily need particularly high quality cars, but in that case, you do need numbers. This year, Kruse seems to have neither.

Again, it’s a good time to buy, a lousy time to sell. How hard is that to understand? Of course, it’s not all truth and reconciliation on the web. Edmunds, post-Monterey: “Numbers are down, but things could have been much worse had the economy not recently made a push upward.” Or the auction houses hadn’t managed the quality of the lots to keep the pig smothered in lipstick. Just sayin’. As is our wont.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Rodney Rodney on Jan 05, 2010

    My name is Rodney, and i too am a victim of Kruse Auctions. They chose to, and still after over 4 months, have not payed me for my car they sold. This seems to be quite a re-occurring experience, them not paying people. I have posted my story in my blog where i hope more people can post their experiences and eventually get something done about this ongoing saga. I welcome anyone here to come read it, and or post your Kruse auction experiences. Look forward to hearing from you. www.kruseauctionripoff.com

  • Dean Kruse Is a Scumbag Dean Kruse Is a Scumbag on Nov 24, 2022

    Dean Kruse is a scumbag. He ripped my family off and I contacted his minister son who promised to have his dad call us - it never happened. I hope their entire family gets herpes. Sacks of garbage!

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next