USPS Doubles EV Purchase After Public Pressure

by Chris Teague

Published: December 21st, 2022

usps doubles ev purchase after public pressure

We’ve been hearing about the new USPS mail trucks for what seems like years, but the government agency is only just getting into the ordering process for the funky delivery vehicles. Earlier this week, the USPS stated that it would double the number of electric delivery vehicles it would order, following pushback from the White House and the public.

Though the federal government and almost every major automaker are pushing hard toward an electric future, the purchase became highly controversial when Postmaster General holdover Louis DeJoy announced that just 10 percent of the massive fleet purchase would be electric. That number was revised to 40 percent after severe and immediate blowback, and now the USPS expects to spend $9.6 billion through 2028 buying up to 45,000 electric delivery vehicles from Oshkosh Defense. It will purchase another 21,000 electric vehicles in off-the-shelf commercial configurations.

Despite the sharp increase in the number of electric mail carriers being ordered, the USPS appears pragmatic about converting to EVs. It acknowledged that gasoline-powered vehicles will be “necessary to meet immediate vehicle replacement needs.”

The current vehicle of choice for mail carriers is the Grumman LLV (long-life vehicle), which has been a major component of USPS mail delivery since the late 1980s. The aging fleet is almost a national embarrassment at this point, as the vehicles are all years past their useful lifespans, and the distinct sound they produce as they not so gracefully lumber through suburbia won’t easily be forgotten.

Oshkosh Defense’s replacement looks like something out of the future compared to the old Grumman. An enormous windshield will help prevent pedestrian collisions, and the trucks offer more creature comforts for mail carriers than the barebones Grumman.

[Image: Eric Glenn via Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#USPS #mailtruck #WhiteHouse #OshkoshDefense

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 49 comments

Jeff S on Dec 22, 2022

Art Vandelay--You have to consider the source.

Like Reply
Jeff S on Dec 23, 2022

This New Battery Will Destroy The Entire EV Industry! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVPfYE_tMKY&ab_channel=TechSpaceHow Developments In Nuclear Fusion Change Everything | Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s2ynUAJ5ZU&ab_channel=StarTalk

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.