U.S. Treasury Stalls EV Tax Credit Guidance

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Monday, the United States Treasury Department said it will issue proposed guidance for the updated EV tax credit scheme in March of 2023. However, the Inflation Reduction Act (H.R. 5376) directed the department to finalize its recommendations before 2022 was over by setting a December 31st deadline. While it sounds like bad news for automakers, the delay may actually work to their advantage by delaying new mineral and battery component requirements that may have made vehicles using foreign-sourced batteries ineligible.


Based upon earlier reports, there were two aspects of the revised EV tax credit plan (which was slipped into the so-called Inflation Reduction Act) that were rubbing automakers the wrong way. Item number one involved linking credits to unionized labor, which would have had sweeping political ramifications while favoring domestic manufacturers working with the UAW. Item number two involved material content requirements, because most batteries and their raw materials have to be imported from other parts of the world.


The whole thing is supposedly designed to incentivize domestic EV production. But how it’s being done has resulted in rolling criticism, as regulatory actions do run the risk of rustling in favoritism. Some feel like EV tax credits have run their course and are devolving into federal handouts now that production caps have been done away with. Though automakers don’t seem to mind them sticking around, as long as they benefit their businesses specifically. The government has attempted to strike a balance by adding income caps and vehicle price limitations.


Those items will still go into effect on January 1st, 2023. What will be missing is the critical mineral and battery component requirement that would determine how much of a vehicle’s battery would need to be assembled in North America to qualify for government subsidies. By delaying any decisions until March, automakers could theoretically still source batteries from other parts of the world without suffering any financial ramifications stemming from the updated EV tax credit scheme.


"Treasury will issue a notice of proposed rule-making (NPRM) in March with proposed guidance on the critical minerals and battery components requirements," the department stated on its website. "By statute, the critical mineral and battery component requirements take effect only after Treasury issues that proposed rule."


While the original legislation requires 50 percent of all battery components to be made or assembled in North America by 2024. By 2029, that number swells to an even 100 percent for any business hoping to see some tax money floated on a per-vehicle basis. But none of that can happen until the Treasury Department issues a comprehensive annual plan that irons out all the details.


"As much as automakers and policymakers would like this transition to happen faster, increasing access to critical raw materials, expanding manufacturing capacity and broadening our domestic supply chains will not happen overnight," the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents just about every large automaker on the planet, said in the comments filed to the Treasury in November.


Despite some of the content requirements being delayed until at least the spring, the department has said it still plans to release information on the “anticipated direction of the critical mineral and battery component requirements that vehicles must meet to qualify for tax incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act” before the holidays are over and that companies “will be able to access tax benefits from many of the law’s climate provisions” starting on January 1st.


Interestingly, it seems that the Treasury didn’t have much trouble deciding how to handle most of the objectives and tax provisions outlined in H.R. 5376 – just the bit that would have forced automakers to produce batteries domestically or run the risk of having their vehicles become ineligible for tax subsidies.


[Image: DCStockPhotography/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Joseph Watkins Joseph Watkins on Jan 09, 2023

    Those of Us here in the United States that are born in the United States and can not afford an EV need to start a class action lawsuit to receive our EV credits in A check!!! It is only Fair to all Americans to be treated Equally!!! Not just rewarding People who can afford an EV with Our Tax Dollars!!!

  • Joseph Watkins Joseph Watkins on Jan 09, 2023

    $7,500 for Every American citizen not only the Rich!!! Class Action Lawsuit!!! Let's Go Brandon!!!

    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 09, 2023

      Tax credits are amounts that reduce the tax you pay on your taxable income.

      You'd have to pay more than 7,500 in taxes to qualify. It is the government letting you keep your own tax dollars to spend elsewhere. It isn't anyone else coughing up cash to give to you.



  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
Next