Some Bronco Owners Say Trail Turn Assist Killed Their Axles

by Chris Teague

Published: May 16th, 2023

some bronco owners say trail turn assist killed their axles

Trail Turn Assist is a cool Ford Bronco feature that brakes the inside rear wheel to tighten the turning radius and help the SUV navigate challenging off-road obstacles. Though helpful, some owners have reported that the feature could damage the vehicle.

At least two owners have taken to the Bronco6G.com forum in recent months to talk about Trail Turn Assist’s impact on their Bronco’s axles, claiming that the feature causes too much stress on the axle and related components. Some forum users responded with stories of others having the problem, stating that the solution is to weld around the broken attachment points, a fix that is neither practical nor acceptable for a new vehicle.

Some stated that their dealer refused to fix the component under warranty, with one saying the shop said the Bronco had aftermarket mods. Ford’s warranty language states that using the SUV in a manner described in the owner’s manual does not void the warranty, but it’s hard to know what happened before and after using Trail Turn Assist. The automaker also said that the feature is for use on loose or slippery surfaces and that using it on hard roads could increase tire wear and cause damage.

These sorts of issues are always tricky to sort out. On the one hand, it’s easy to jump on Ford for denying what seems like a straightforward warranty issue, but we have no idea how the SUVs were being used when they broke. If there were modifications, the warranty could have been voided before the owner used Trail Turn, but again, it’s almost impossible to accurately cast judgment without having been there.

[Image: Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#FordBronco #trailturnassist

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 27 comments

Redapple2 on May 17, 2023

I ll say this. American Axle or a Dana on my truck? I going dana all day - any day.

1 Reply
Wjtinfwb on May 17, 2023

I question some of these electronic features that, while easily enabled, can be very hard on the driveline. In addition to trail-turn, how about that line-lock feature on the 5.0 Mustangs? Or the "No-Lift" feature allowing you to keep the accelerator pinned while slamming through the gears. Or "launch mode" which optimizes revs while you dump the clutch and mat the gas pedal? Will be interesting to see how the manufacturers handle the inevitable claims from these otherwise cool features.

Like Reply
- CoastieLenn on May 22, 2023
  
  The thing with these features (largely) is that the ECM/TCM/BCM have counters for each of those modules. The dealership can easily tell if the car has either a) been launched 432 times in a single driving cycle [abuse] or b) has had the stored data cleared right before bringing the car in for repair [willful intent?]. Not to say that it will make it easier for the dealer to deny warranty claims, but it gives them ammo to use against the owner if they can prove neglect.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.