Ford Dealers Asked to Pause Further EV Investments While It Reviews Model e Program

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Ford’s EV transition hasn’t been the easiest, but the automaker isn’t the only one in its orbit feeling the heat. The Blue Oval recently asked its suppliers to help it cut costs and announced early on that its dealers would need to make significant investments to continue selling its electric models. Now, the company is telling dealers to pause further investments while it reviews the requirements of its EV certification program.


Dealers wanting to sell Ford EVs under the Model e certification had until June 30 to install Level 2 charging stations, but the automaker’s review is expected to extend through that month. Ford had pulled back on some of the Model e requirements late last year and announced the delay of its three-row electric SUV by two years amid slowing EV demand growth.

Ford CEO Jim Farley was at every one of the 11 meetings, which more than 1,000 dealers attended. Stores were initially asked to have five Level 2 chargers to become certified, but the company’s late 2023 changes cut that number to two. The “elite” program required five Level 3 chargers at the start, but Ford cut that number to three. Employee training benchmarks were also eased as part of the shift.


Though around half of the automaker’s dealer network is enrolled in the program, Ford’s Model e business is on track to lose more than $5 billion this year. It’s now working to regain dealers’ trust, as the program was met with significant pushback, and buyers haven’t been as eager to hop on the EV train as many had hoped.

[Images: Woodsnorthphoto, AroundtheWorldPhotos, Tada Images via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 62 comments
  • Daniel Bridger Daniel Bridger on May 23, 2024

    When Biden yells "jump" and CEOs ask how high? No common sense anymore.

    • See 1 previous
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on May 23, 2024

      In Amerika, all roads lead to Fedgov.



  • Duties Duties on May 23, 2024

    Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.


    Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.


    Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.

  • Buickman mostly cut and paste information. where is Jack Baruth when you need him?
  • ToolGuy In a perfect world (we don't have that), and a stable world (also no), one might expect the used EV pricing curve to follow the new EV pricing curve but with a lag. Overall that might be sort of what we are seeing but I will have to noodle on it more. (I know you can't wait.)
  • ToolGuy Ok after listening to the podcast (and re-listening to the relevant part while doing a painting job in the hot sun, won't make any significant pronouncements at this point) I was curious about the methodology. ¶ Here you go: "Methodology iSeeCars analyzed over 2.2 million 1- to 5-year-old used cars sold in May 2023 and 2024. The average listing prices of each car model were compared between the two time periods, and the differences were expressed as both a percentage difference from the 2023 price as well as a dollar difference. Heavy-duty vehicles, low-volume vehicles, vehicles discontinued as of the 2023 model year, and vehicles in production for fewer than four of the last five model years for each period were excluded from further analysis." ¶ So for any specific model, you have age and mileage and condition factoring in (think of the volume curve for 'new' models over the past 5 years). ¶ The overall averages have a -lot- of model mix going on. ¶ Random question: is the 'listing price' the listing price (likely) or the actual transaction price? (It matters if the listing prices were too optimistic a year ago, i.e., some of the 'drop' would represent more realism in the listing prices.)
  • Johnny ringo VinFast? The name sounds like some kind of a sports drink to me. The early reviews of their vehicles were absolutely terrible. The last vehicle I am going to buy is from a no-name company without any kind of reputation behind it. This reminds me of the Yugo-that was certainly successful.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X What is the term for a car that is not a collector, but just cool enough to own? As in it being interesting and special. Just priced right, but not worthy enough to over value it. Just to have fun with it. This would be similar to owning a Saab 900, a Subaru Brat or Pontiac Fiero. Just something different.
Next