Rare Rides Icons: The Lincoln Mark Series Cars, Feeling Continental (Part XIII)
We return to the Lincoln Mark story at a very promising time for the personal luxury coupe. Aside from Ford’s floundering Thunderbird, several other new PLC models arrived in the late sixties. Every major Detroit automaker had one, and circa the turn of the Seventies even more would arrive!
Together, they formed three tiers of personal luxury, segmented by asking price. At the top was the long-standing Cadillac Eldorado, and in the middle were the Thunderbird, Buick Riviera, and Oldsmobile Toronado. They’d be joined in the Seventies by the likes of the Pontiac Grand Prix, Chrysler Cordoba, and Chevy Monte Carlo.
In 1965 Ford’s VP of passenger car product, Lee Iacocca, decided he’d make some use of the fifth-generation Thunderbird’s platform for a higher PLC purpose. With as much parts sharing and cost saving as possible, he’d create a luxurious new Mark that could take on the Eldorado. Ignoring the Marks III, IV, and V of the Fifties, the new Mark would start at III, and attempt to connect itself with the ultra-luxurious Continental Mark II of 1956. We begin today (oddly) with some endurance racing.
In under two years, the new Continental Mark III was complete and ready for its exciting debut. Though the Mark was almost anti-sports in its mission and design, it debuted at the 1968 12 Hours of Sebring race in Florida. Sponsored by Alitalia that year, racers vied for the Alitalia Airlines Trophy.
The race took place on March 23rd, 1968, and advertisements for the race showed the new Mark III in painted format next to Ford’s GT40. The yellow example shown was one of four GT40s entered in that year’s race. One example (Edward Nelson Racing) finished 16th overall. A firm called J.W. Engineering had two GT40s, one of which completed 157 laps but was unclassified.
J.W. Engineering’s other GT40 tapped out on lap 37 due to clutch failure. Finally, William Wonder entered a GT40 in that year’s race, but it was one of 14 cars that didn’t actually show up for race day. The race was a high-profile location to debut a luxury coupe, and it was especially to the tastes of sunny Florida.
Though the obvious comparison in size would be between the two-door Thunderbird and Mark, its wheelbase was actually that of the Thunderbird Landau sedan. Ford selected the 117.2-inch basis of the Landau over the 114.2” of the coupe. The heavier Mark III body was wider than the Thunderbird and spanned 79.4 inches versus the 77.2” of the Bird. With its more formal profile, Mark III was slightly taller than the Thunderbird coupe’s 52.8” height, at 53 inches.
The Landau with its awkward vinyl treatment and coach doors was taller still, at 53.7 inches. As far as overall length, the T-bird sedan was slightly longer than its two-door sibling at 209.4 inches (206.9” on the coupe). To better show its PLC and halo status, the Mark III was longer than either: an impressive 216.1 inches.
With its larger size and luxury equipment, the Lincoln was much heavier than either Thunderbird. Thunderbird coupes were 4,248 pounds and sedans were 4,256 pounds, but the Mark arrived at a hefty 4,866 pounds. Some of that weight was down to its extra large engine, the 460 cubic-inch (7.5-liter) V8. The 460 was not available in Thunderbirds; that model’s largest displacement was the 429 cubic inch (7.0L) 385 V8.
The 460 was based on the 385, and in Mark III usage made 365 gross horsepower. It ended up as the largest displacement variant of the 385 and was the successor to the old MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) 462 V8. Power was considered adequate, but was plenty for the mission of a PLC.
Mark III’s exterior styling blended the sensibility of early Seventies Detroit iron with the general luxury legacy provided by the Continental Mark II, and the contemporary Continental. Iacocca’s initial direction of “Rolls-Royce grille on a Thunderbird” was taken largely to heart. The Mark III’s prow sported a chromed waterfall grille topped by a slab of chrome, just like a Rolls-Royce.
The grille flowed down to a chromed bumper that came to a point in the middle and mirrored the grille’s shape. It extended to corners that wrapped under the fender, which was a similar take to the front corner of the 1969 Continental. Also similar to Continental were the cornering lamps, integrated into the vertical section of the front fender. Unlike the Continental, the Mark III had concealed headlamps, which were all the rage in the late Sixties.
Fenders were an important part of the Mark III, both from a size and design perspective. Extra super long fenders were most notable for their strong upper edge decorated with a chrome trim strip. They curved sharply around to the hood, which had a considerable power bulge. The bulge ran from the windshield down the hood’s entire length and grew stronger as it terminated at the proud upright grille.
Along its side, the Mark III was less flashy than its Eldorado competition and relied a bit less on chrome trim. A secondary character line appeared on the Mark’s fender and ran from the corner lamp all the way to the rear. It raised in slight elevation after the door and followed the fender’s leading edge shape (like on the Continental).
Unlike the Continental, the Mark III had flared wheel arches that had an additional, exaggerated character line of their own. Said line was decorated in chrome, as was the actual wheel arch. Chrome also ran underneath the entire rocker panel, a given luxury touch for a domestic car of the period.
The rear of the Mark III had a family resemblance to the Continental but went its own direction in two important ways. First, the Mark looked more current than the Continental, which was showing its early Sixties roots by that time. Second, the new Mark reintroduced the “continental style” spare tire hump from the Mark II, and indeed the original Continental of the Forties.
The fender that kicked upward after the Mark III’s door flowed down to a rear end that was not all that removed from the Eldorado. The rear fender cut sharply downward and housed a simple vertical tail lamp, a similar design to the corner marker at the front. Rear brake lamps were the Mark III’s most obvious tie to the standard Continental, as a direct parts share.
The trunk lid was large, smooth, and shaped mostly by the Continental tire hump. It presented a raised and rounded surface in the middle and pressed outward from the trunk’s more angled surface above the bumper. Continental lettering followed around the edge of the trunk design, another callback to the Mark II.
In the middle was a large Continental logo, underlined by a thin chrome strip that ran above the bumper. Aside from the wrap-under chromed corners, the bumper was largely devoid of other styling. The bumper’s lower portion held the reverse lamps and license plate mounting.
We’ll pause there for today, and pick up next time with the Mark III’s interior, convenience features, and immediate sales success.
[Images: 12 Hours of Sebring, Ford]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Wjtinfwb on Aug 25, 2022
After several Cadillac's in the '60s my Dad traded his '68 Calais coupe for a '70 Mark III, triple dark green. It immediately became the best looking car on the block, challenging the neighbor's White on Blue 70.5 Trans Am. Unfortunately my uncle wrecked the Lincoln after a night of over-indulging in Ft. Lauderdale. The Mark was repaired but dad felt it never was the same. Not caring for the more ornate styling of the Mark IV, dad ordered a new '73 Continental coupe that was a very comfortable and stylish car but nowhere the looker the Mark was. Still a beautiful car, Thunderbird underpinnings or not, I'd love a '71 with the high-back Twin Comfort split front bench.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Theflyersfan Interest rates going sky high should knock out the next group of people on the fence waiting to buy. I haven't looked, but I'm betting 2.9 and 3.9% on longer 60+ month loans are either gone or almost impossible to qualify for. I'm starting to get "turn down the thermostat and put on a sweater" vibes here. And if you're an American in Iran, get out. We don't need a sequel to Argo.
- Theflyersfan @Matthew Guy: You might have jumped the gun on this one a little bit. Chevy's website doesn't have a build/config page up yet, nor does KBB or Edmunds. All we have to go on is what Chevy has leaked out to us without seeing the finished product. And I don't see prices on options and each model just yet, just somewhat "around this amount." But all that being said, if I was in the market for a pickup, and saying that I close on a new home later this week (locked in rates before interest rates really went crazy), the MX-5 might need a stablemate. And the "regular" trucks that everyone thinks of have just gotten too large, too over-styled (except for the Ram), and way too expensive. So this size truck seems to hit the sweet spot of people, cargo, and ease of driving/parking needs. So, I'd probably go mid-range with something like the Z71 trim level. I'm guessing it'll be in the mid-30's with enough tech to keep everything connected, reasonable enough fuel economy, and comfort for a road trip. There are some great offroad trails all around Kentucky, and that would have me interested in something like a ZR2, but without knowing exact cost, not sure about that one.But in this class, the Tacoma and Ranger are up there in years and Nissan, while putting in a different engine and transmission, pretty much tidied up the same old bones and is selling it as all new...(Z car...cough...cough). I'd still have to try the Frontier vs. Colorado to make up my mind.
- Bkojote I go off-roading quite a bit (nothing extreme, just some fun scenic trails) and everyone in our group with a Colorado has basically given up or switched to a Toyota/Jeep after dealing with constant issues and $$$ in repairs.The best trim for the Colorado is something on-road biased. These trucks are good for towing toys or some light duty stuff but a burly off road trim on this is silly as the 4WD system can't handle it. While I believe they fixed the major design flaws of the prior generation (an easily-damaged oil pan and poorly positioned shocks that hang precariously low), the clutch-based 4WD system is notorious for failing on moderate trails- look no further than the recent C&D "Trail Boss" review.
- Arthur Dailey The absolute best series on TTAC and so few responses? I am going to assume that the readership (B&B) is either too young or did not have enough 'coin' to have enjoyed these vehicles during their heyday.
- Arthur Dailey From circa 1985 to 1998 I was partially responsible for a 'fleet' (up to just over two dozen at any one time) of 15 passenger and 12 passenger vans as well as some converted/ex smaller school buses. All 3 domestic manufacturers were represented. We purchased one Dodge 15 passenger van that came from the factory propane powered. Later converted a number of other vans, predominantly GM's made at the Scarboro van plant to propane. The propane conversion did reduce the passenger capacity. In our experience the Fords were indeed the most robust.