Rare Rides Icons: The Lincoln Mark Series Cars, Feeling Continental (Part XII)
Lincoln was in a bad way at the turn of the Sixties, both financially and in terms of its product. The company lost hundreds of millions (adjusted) in the early and middle portion of the decade, when it invested in and then promptly canceled the Continental Division. Attempting a rebound, Lincoln dumped lots more cash into a new unibody platform that was exclusive to Lincoln models.
The new lineup was on sale from 1958 to 1960 and was unfortunately introduced at the start of a sharp economic recession. However, even after the recession ended Lincoln’s gaudy and overworked styling caused customers to steer clear of Lincoln and purchase Cadillacs instead. Lincoln lost $60 million ($550 million adj.) more.
1961 heralded the arrival of an all-Continental lineup, the Elwood Engel design that was instantly popular and saved the company. However, the new and streamlined (in all ways) Lincoln lineup spared no room for a Continental Mark series. The Mark slumbered until 1968.
The personal luxury car (PLC) status of the first and second Continental in the Forties and Fifties did not prove sustainable as a Lincoln product. The failure was down to the special nature of the first two Continentals, followed by the lazy gingerbread action that created the Mark III, IV, and V. Elsewhere in the company, the Thunderbird was a hugely successful second-tier PLC. And General Motors continued to market the Cadillac Eldorado and Buick Riviera, joined by the Oldsmobile Toronado in 1966.
The turn of the calendar into the Seventies would see less expensive PLC offerings arrive, which meant the PLC genre was suddenly accessible to the middle market consumer. It was a new third tier of PLC: Think of the Pontiac Grand Prix, the Chevrolet Monte Carlo, and the Chrysler Cordoba. The PLC was experiencing a resurgence! Much to the chagrin of Detroit, the Seventies would be the last decade where the genre was relevant in any meaningful way. Lincoln needed in on the action, and fast.
The 1961 Continental made it through the remainder of the Sixties in a single generation. It was an unusual move to keep a platform around for so long, but the Continental was successful and Lincoln needed to save money. Through two refreshes (1964 and 1966) the Continental was updated with more trim, and a new hardtop coupe arrived to compete with the likes of the upscale Imperial Crown Coupe and Cadillac Coupe de Ville. However, even though the new two-door pumped up sales 36 percent upon introduction, it was too big and formal and could not compete with the likes of the Eldorado.
Lincoln revisited the idea of a halo coupe sold as a Mark: a two-door that would be entirely separate from the Continental line and have a different body. Enter Lee Iacocca, developer and consistent champion of the PLC. The beginnings of the new model occurred in 1965. In September that year, Iacocca was the VP of passenger cars and trucks at Ford. He went to Gene Bordinat, VP of design at Ford, and suggested he should add a Rolls-Royce grille to a Thunderbird. Time for a brief Thunderbird sidebar.
It’s important to bear in mind the Thunderbird was in its fourth generation from 1964 to 1966, and things were still very positive for Ford’s breakout PLC star. It finished the three-year run of its fourth generation with over 236,000 sales. But the fifth generation of 1967 to 1971 was where things went off the rails.
Suddenly there was a Thunderbird range that included a two-door hardtop, a two-door formal Landau model, and a four-door Landau sedan with coach doors, but no convertible. The new Thunderbird had a different formula than it used since inception: Ford turned Thunderbird into a larger car to pull the model closer to a Lincoln offering, and emphasize luxury. It moved away from unibody construction and switched to a body-on-frame platform.
Early styling was not what the consumer wanted (your author likes the ‘67 to ‘69), and Ford attempted to rectify the issue in 1970 with a gawky coffin nose like Pontiac used. While none were stunning, the hardtop looked much better than the Stutz-like roof of the Landau, and both were better than the awkward Landau sedan with its multi-piece and mandatory vinyl roof. Sales tumbled every single year, from a high in 1967 of 77,976 down to 36,055 in 1971.
Iacocca was keenly aware of the fifth Thunderbird’s failings, and wanted to spread around its development costs via a new halo model. The most important thing for Lincoln to set its sights on at the time was the all-new front-drive Eldorado. Introduced in 1967 on the E-body, the Eldorado (and ‘66 Toronado) were a radical departure for General Motors and ushered in a new era of styling. Compare the stodgy looks of a ‘67 Imperial Coupe to the new Eldorado, for instance.
It was important to associate the new Mark with the right car in Lincoln’s history, which meant the hand-assembled Mark II from the Continental Division. The unibody Mark III through V were not worth inclusion in the family portrait and had been shuffled off to the Home for Forgotten Marks by the late Sixties. The new coupe would wear Mark III badging, and exist as the most expensive model of Continental. As Continental was the only model Lincoln offered at the time, the company was unwilling to let the Mark III stand on its own.
Mark III would make its branding as exclusive as possible, and did not associate itself with Lincoln at all. There was no Lincoln badging on the car body, any of the paperwork from the factory, nor did Lincoln appear on the window sticker. The VIN plate said Continental on it too. Though Ford didn’t admit its association, it was the same strategy used to sell the Continental Mark III (by Lincoln) of 1958. Brochures had a Ford logo in the corner, instead of a Lincoln crosshair.
Branding aside, the Mark III project was a brief one. It was underway from September 1965 to late 1967 and was completed as cheaply as possible. Iacocca returned to the formula he’d used to create the hugely successful new Mustang: Build an exciting new vehicle model using as many off-the-shelf parts as possible, and put it on a platform that’s already been paid for. It worked with the Mustang, it would work with the Mark III, and it worked a couple of decades later with the Chrysler minivans. We’ll pick up there next time.
[Images: Ford, General Motors, Chrysler]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Writing things for TTAC since late 2016 from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio. You can find me on Twitter @CoreyLewis86, and I also contribute at Forbes Wheels.
More by Corey Lewis
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
- Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
- FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
- Tassos A "small car", TIM????????????This is the GLE. Have you even ever SEEN the huge thing at a dealer's??? NOT even the GLC,and Merc has TWO classes even SMALLER than the C (The A and the B, you guessed it? You must be a GENIUS!).THe E is a "MIDSIZED" crossover, NOT A SMALL ONE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, oh CLUELESS one.I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THE NONSENSE you post here every god damned day.And I BET you will never even CORRECT your NONSENSE, much less APOLOGIZE for your cluelessness and unprofessionalism.
- Stuki Moi "How do you take a small crossover and make it better?Slap the AMG badge on it and give it the AMG treatment."No, you don't.In fact, that is specifically what you do NOT do.Huge, frail wheels, and postage stamp sidewalls, do nothing but make overly tall cuvs tramline and judder. And render them even less useful across the few surfaces where they could conceivably have an advantage over more properly dimensioned cars. And: Small cuvs have pitiful enough fuel range as it is, even with more sensible engines.Instead, to make a small CUV better, you 1)make it a lower slung wagon. And only then give it the AMG treatment. AMG'ing, makes sense for the E class. And these days with larger cars, even the C class. For the S class, it never made sense, aside from the sheer aural visceralness of the last NA V8. The E-class is the center of AMG. Even the C-class, rarely touches the M3.Or 2) You give it the Raptor/Baja treatment. Massive, hypersophisticated suspension travel allowing landing meaningful jumps. As well as driving up and down wide enough stairs if desired. That's a kind of driving for which a taller stance, and IFS/IRS, makes sense.Attempting to turn a CUV into some sort of a laptime wonder, makes about as much sense as putting an America's Cup rig atop a ten deck cruiseship.