Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XXXV)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We return to Eldorado coverage with the “all-new” claim applied to the Eldorado of 1963. It was misleading, as the luxury convertible embarked on a new generation while the rest of the lineup was considered a refresh. The Cadillac marketing people justified their grandiose claims because in addition to a visual rework, the Eldorado changed its manufacturing location. It moved upmarket (shedding the two-year DeVille association) and joined the exclusive Fleetwood assembly line with the Sixty Special and Seventy-Five models. And part of its new upper-crust lifestyle meant a reduction in chrome trappings in addition to its refreshed corporate appearance.


(Note: The brownish Eldorado shown here is a 1962, while the red example is a 1963.)

Front end revisions to the Eldorado of 1963 were immediately clear, as the yacht’s prow extended some inches further over the front wheels than it did the prior year. Quad headlamps were still all the rage in America, and they got closer together in 1963 and pulled closer to the body. Note how the extended sights where the headlamps resided in 1962 were no more.

The hood and grille were newly squared off in 1963, presenting a front end that was stronger and wore a new stepped hood bulge. There was also a revised egg crate grille that carried the same two separate sections as before, but used a smaller egg crate pattern. Taking up real estate was an additional step rearward in the grille, where the pattern changed to larger horizontal slats as it terminated at the headlamps. 

The chrome bar that bisected the grille had a new extension around the front corner and onto the wheel arch, which was not the case in 1962. It made for a cleaner and more horizontally consistent front end appearance. Beneath the bar were new amber signal indicators, integrated into the wrap-around fog lamp. It was the first year in a very long time where cornering/fog and indicator lamps were not at the lowest edge of the front bumper. 

At the lower edge of the bumper there was more upright metal; it retreated back under the body less than the prior year. The bumper wrapped around to form the front edge of the wheel arch as it had in prior years. The Eldorado’s body was taller, more slab sided, and sat lower on the wheels than in 1962. A strong new character line began at the front clip, and tapered just into the door. This was a notable change from the rocket inspiration of 1962, which saw the body line continue all the way to the rear end. 

From a side view some more modernization was obvious: The curved A-pillar from the Fifties was fully eliminated and replaced by a rearward slanted pillar. It took with it the final notions of a wraparound windshield, the craze Cadillac created with the first Eldorado of 1953. Overall, the side profile of the Eldorado was much cleaner in 1963 with less visual interference from creases, detailing, chrome, and lower fins.

Speaking of fins, the lower one was removed entirely in 1963, as was the chrome speared character line that bore it. In its place was a smooth surface, punctuated only by ELDORADO block lettering along the lower sill. The sill received a new lightly ribbed lower chrome strip to make up for the lack of chrome elsewhere, and draw the eye to the sheer length of the Eldorado and how low it was to the floor.

Note the perceived height difference between the 1962 and 1963 models via the amount of rear tire visible between the two years. Continuing the rear end’s more simplified profile was a fin that angled rearward less sharply than in 1962. The fins were also lower profile, and blended more into the fender; they looked less like a separate entity as Cadillac designers reeled in excesses. At the very end of the tail was the Cadillac wreath and crest, reserved for Fleetwood-made models.

The rear deck reflected quite a rework in 1963, and was perhaps more of a step forward than the front end. Lower fins rode aside a softened trunk lid, which displayed a crest and Cadillac V instead of Eldorado lettering. The intent was to remind the Eldorado was a Cadillac first, and a Fleetwood second. No longer was Eldorado permitted to stand on its own.

Rear end lighting looked much more modern in 1963, as rectangular block red and clear lamps appeared and shunned any of the small detailing of 1962. The chrome from the lower sill wrapped up cleanly around the lamps at either corner, and continued (with no lower fin) onto the bumper. The bumper was largely the same in its central section as the prior year.

The license plate moved from the bumper up into the rear clip, and was central to a new chromed grille detail plate. Though it was interrupted by the license plate, it more closely resembled the front grille in 1963 and was a bit less overdone in its detailing. 

The 1963’s look was finished by a reworked set of chrome turbine wheel covers, a slight refinement over the 1962 version. There were no longer color-matched inserts in the wheel, but the detailing was a bit more fine to make up for it. The wheel cover also had a deeper dish profile than the prior design. And the center cap reflected the new style Cadillac crest and wreath, in place of 1962’s horizontally stretched crest.

At the start of this design comparison, your author was fully prepared to say the 1963 refresh didn’t add up to much difference in the overall design. But upon closer examination, the changes made for a notably different overall look. More refined and cohesive, the Eldorado looked much more Sixties-ready. It suddenly carried cues that would sustain the brand through the late Seventies. 


But could the same be said for the interior? General Motors was not known for spending big bucks on their interior refreshes at the time. We’ll take a close look in our next installment.


[Images: seller, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 12 comments
  • Tassos Tassos 5 days ago

    Since this column is the most appropriate one of all TTAC Articles on Design, I use it to inform you of the passing of Automotive Great, Designer BRUNO SACCO. While he was born in Italy, he worked neither there nor in the US, as many of you know, but in Germany, and was Mercedes Benz's Chief Designer for many years, in his 1958-1999 Career with the LEGENDARY Automaker. He is responsible for MANY ICONIC, Beautiful Benzes, esp the Magnificent 560 SEC S Series coupe, which he also owned himself. In 2006, he was inducted in the US Auto Hall of Fame, and here is his 3 min speech in broken English (youtube link refused to paste)

    • See 2 previous
    • Tassos Tassos 4 days ago


      I cannot reply to this "Jeff" person directly, so I do it here. Apparently you write book reviews by your favorite author before you read even one page of the book? I expect Corey to do a good job, but if you expect a truly "very thorough" "in memoriam" of Bruno Sacco, and keeping in mind that Corey does 50 articles to, definitely thoroughly, review ONE Caddy model or other, to do justice to the Great Bruno Sacco, he would have to do 250 to 500 articles, 50 each on each legendary, iconic Model he designed over his illustrious career.

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey 5 days ago

    Another great column in the series. I much prefer the looks of the '63 to that of the '62. A far more cohesive design.


    Is anyone else starting to change their minds about fender skirts?

    • Jeff Jeff 5 days ago

      I don't mind the fender skirts on 50s, 60s, and 70s Cadillacs, Olds 98s, Buick Electra 225s, Lincolns, and Imperials but I really don't want to see them make a comeback on modern vehicles. I feel the same about whitewall tires. I would like to see a return of different color interiors besides black, gray, and beige.


  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next