Junkyard Find: 1972 Saab 99
When the arms manufacturer known as Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget built its first production automobile, the goofy-looking 1950 Saab 92, that company's best-known product was the goofy-looking fighter jet known as the "Flying Barrel." Both the aircraft and cars got the job done, but it wasn't until the late 1960s that Saab built a jet that looked just as cool as the hippest Lockheeds and Mikoyan-Gureviches. At around the same time, Saab introduced its first car that wasn't viewed by non-Scandinavians as an oddball machine for eccentrics: The 99. Here's one of those cars, found in a self-service yard just south of Denver.
The 99 has been a tough vehicle for me to find during my junkyard travels; prior to today's '72, I'd only documented two discarded 99s. In fact, I'd found more Saab 96s in car graveyards up to that point (plus a single 92, though that was in a lichen-covered yard in northern Sweden). I don't recall seeing many 99s on the street as a youngster, despite having spent my formative automotive years in the Swedish-car-crazed San Francisco Bay Area.
The Saab 99 was built from 1968 through 1984, with sales in the United States during the 1969 through 1980 model years.
Just as the iconic Volvo 240 was really a reworking of the late-1960s Volvo 140, so was the iconic Saab 900 an update of its 99 ancestor. In fact, if you take apart a 1993 Saab 900, you'll find just about every major feature of the 1968 Saab 99's design still present ( later 900s were built on an Opel platform, making them siblings to the Saturn L-Series cars).
Saab had been reluctant to make the jump from two-stroke to four-stroke car engines, finally buying Ford Taunus V4s to put in new 96s starting in 1967. For the 99, Saab partnered with Triumph to develop an overhead-cam straight-four engine. Slanted over at 45 degrees from the vertical and with a Citroën-style transmission-in-front longitudinal engine mounting, this front-wheel-drive rig was weird enough to please the Trollhättanites while still delivering a good driving experience.
Triumph put this engine in the Dolomite and TR7, and used it as the basis for the troublesome Stag V8. Saab reworked it for greater reliability, finally producing a thorough redesign in 1981. The one in this car (if it's the original unit) displaces 1,854 CCs and was rated at 97 horsepower.
This car is in rough, weatherbeaten condition, and it's full of car parts plus random electronic junk.
I'm pretty sure that it was a parts car bought by a Denver-area Saab aficionado and used as outdoor storage for a decade or three.
I found a bunch of Bay Area newspapers from early 1989 inside. Bought in California 33 years ago, driven to Colorado, and parked forever? We'll never know.
The mid-80s-vintage Pioneer KE A330 cassette deck fits the parked-since-1989 theory.
Thanks to the five-digit odometer, it's impossible to say how many miles this car drove during its life. I'm guessing 122,135 miles looks about right.
Just about every Saab I find in a Colorado junkyard still has old-timey studded snow tires in the trunk. This car is no exception.
Amazingly, an automatic transmission was available as a $200 option (that's about $1,440 in 2022 dollars) on the 1972 Saab 99. This car has the four-on-the-floor manual that went into nearly all 99s.
The sticker price on the 1972 Saab 99 two-door sedan was $3,395, or about $24,475 now. Americans had a surprising number of choices for small front-wheel-drive cars that year; shoppers who didn't want the Saab 99 could choose from such not-so-mainstream offerings as the Fiat 128, Renault 16, Renault 12, Audi Fox, Austin America, Subaru 1400, various Lancias (for really eccentric types), Honda 600, and (of course) the Saab 96 and Sonett. The Honda Civic first appeared here as a 1973 model, followed the next year by the Datsun F-10, and little front-drivers became less suspect in the eyes of the squares after that.
I'm pretty sure headlight covers like this were illegal in 1972 America.
Rough 99s like this aren't worth real money (even very clean original ones barely squeak into five-figure values), so it was unlikely that anyone would have fixed this one up and put it back on the road. I've been checking in on this car over the last month, and it appears that nobody has pulled any parts from it (the same thing happened with a 1976 Saab 99 I found in a nearby yard last fall; it went to The Crusher essentially intact).
You need Saab 99 safety!
[Images by the author]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- SCE to AUX Good summary, Matt.I like EVs, but not bans, subsidies, or carbon credits. Let them find their own level.PM Sunak has done a good thing, but I'm surprised at how sensibly early he made the call. Hopefully they'll ban the ban altogether.
- SCE to AUX "Having spoken to plenty of suppliers over the years, many have told me they tried to adapt to EV production only to be confronted with inconsistent orders."Lofty sales predictions followed by reality.I once worked (very briefly) for a key supplier to Segway, back when "Ginger" was going to change the world. Many suppliers like us tooled up to support sales in the millions, only to sell thousands - and then went bankrupt.
- SCE to AUX "all-electric vehicles, resulting in a scenario where automakers need fewer traditional suppliers"Is that really true? Fewer traditional suppliers, but they'll be replaced with other suppliers. You won't have the myriad of parts for an internal combustion engine and its accessories (exhaust, sensors), but you still have gear reducers (sometimes two or three), electric motors with lots of internal components, motor mounts, cooling systems, and switchgear.Battery packs aren't so simple, either, and the fire recalls show that quality control is paramount.The rest of the vehicle is pretty much the same - suspension, brakes, body, etc.
- Theflyersfan As crazy as the NE/Mid-Atlantic I-95 corridor drivers can be, for the most part they pay attention and there aren't too many stupid games. I think at times it's just too crowded for that stuff. I've lived all over the US and the worst drivers are in parts of the Midwest. As I've mentioned before, Ohio drivers have ZERO lane discipline when it comes to cruising, merging, and exiting. And I've just seen it in this area (Louisville) where many drivers have literally no idea how to merge. I've never seen an area where drivers have no problems merging onto an interstate at 30 mph right in front of you. There are some gruesome wrecks at these merge points because it looks like drivers are just too timid to merge and speed up correctly. And the weaving and merging at cloverleaf exits (which in this day and age need to all go away) borders on comical in that no one has a bloody clue of let car merge in, you merge right to exit, and then someone repeats behind you. That way traffic moves. Not a chance here.And for all of the ragging LA drivers get, I found them just fine. It's actually kind of funny watching them rearrange themselves like after a NASCAR caution flag once traffic eases up and they line up, speed up to 80 mph for a few miles, only to come to a dead halt again. I think they are just so used to the mess of freeways and drivers that it's kind of a "we'll get there when we get there..." kind of attitude.
- Analoggrotto I refuse to comment until Tassos comments.