Junkyard Find: 1972 Saab 99

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

When the arms manufacturer known as Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget built its first production automobile, the goofy-looking 1950 Saab 92, that company's best-known product was the goofy-looking fighter jet known as the "Flying Barrel." Both the aircraft and cars got the job done, but it wasn't until the late 1960s that Saab built a jet that looked just as cool as the hippest Lockheeds and Mikoyan-Gureviches. At around the same time, Saab introduced its first car that wasn't viewed by non-Scandinavians as an oddball machine for eccentrics: The 99. Here's one of those cars, found in a self-service yard just south of Denver.

The 99 has been a tough vehicle for me to find during my junkyard travels; prior to today's '72, I'd only documented two discarded 99s. In fact, I'd found more Saab 96s in car graveyards up to that point (plus a single 92, though that was in a lichen-covered yard in northern Sweden). I don't recall seeing many 99s on the street as a youngster, despite having spent my formative automotive years in the Swedish-car-crazed San Francisco Bay Area.

The Saab 99 was built from 1968 through 1984, with sales in the United States during the 1969 through 1980 model years.

Just as the iconic Volvo 240 was really a reworking of the late-1960s Volvo 140, so was the iconic Saab 900 an update of its 99 ancestor. In fact, if you take apart a 1993 Saab 900, you'll find just about every major feature of the 1968 Saab 99's design still present ( later 900s were built on an Opel platform, making them siblings to the Saturn L-Series cars).

Saab had been reluctant to make the jump from two-stroke to four-stroke car engines, finally buying Ford Taunus V4s to put in new 96s starting in 1967. For the 99, Saab partnered with Triumph to develop an overhead-cam straight-four engine. Slanted over at 45 degrees from the vertical and with a Citroën-style transmission-in-front longitudinal engine mounting, this front-wheel-drive rig was weird enough to please the Trollhättanites while still delivering a good driving experience.

Triumph put this engine in the Dolomite and TR7, and used it as the basis for the troublesome Stag V8. Saab reworked it for greater reliability, finally producing a thorough redesign in 1981. The one in this car (if it's the original unit) displaces 1,854 CCs and was rated at 97 horsepower.

This car is in rough, weatherbeaten condition, and it's full of car parts plus random electronic junk.

I'm pretty sure that it was a parts car bought by a Denver-area Saab aficionado and used as outdoor storage for a decade or three.

I found a bunch of Bay Area newspapers from early 1989 inside. Bought in California 33 years ago, driven to Colorado, and parked forever? We'll never know.

The mid-80s-vintage Pioneer KE A330 cassette deck fits the parked-since-1989 theory.

Thanks to the five-digit odometer, it's impossible to say how many miles this car drove during its life. I'm guessing 122,135 miles looks about right.

Just about every Saab I find in a Colorado junkyard still has old-timey studded snow tires in the trunk. This car is no exception.

Amazingly, an automatic transmission was available as a $200 option (that's about $1,440 in 2022 dollars) on the 1972 Saab 99. This car has the four-on-the-floor manual that went into nearly all 99s.

The sticker price on the 1972 Saab 99 two-door sedan was $3,395, or about $24,475 now. Americans had a surprising number of choices for small front-wheel-drive cars that year; shoppers who didn't want the Saab 99 could choose from such not-so-mainstream offerings as the Fiat 128, Renault 16, Renault 12, Audi Fox, Austin America, Subaru 1400, various Lancias (for really eccentric types), Honda 600, and (of course) the Saab 96 and Sonett. The Honda Civic first appeared here as a 1973 model, followed the next year by the Datsun F-10, and little front-drivers became less suspect in the eyes of the squares after that.

I'm pretty sure headlight covers like this were illegal in 1972 America.

Rough 99s like this aren't worth real money (even very clean original ones barely squeak into five-figure values), so it was unlikely that anyone would have fixed this one up and put it back on the road. I've been checking in on this car over the last month, and it appears that nobody has pulled any parts from it (the same thing happened with a 1976 Saab 99 I found in a nearby yard last fall; it went to The Crusher essentially intact).

You need Saab 99 safety!

[Images by the author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • Marcr Marcr on Aug 30, 2022

    Both the aircraft and cars got the job done, but it wasn't until the late 1960s that Saab built a jet that looked just as cool as the hippest Lockheeds and Mikoyan-Gureviches.


    Uh, you seem to have forgotten the Saab 35 Draken, first flight 1955.


    • See 1 previous
    • Murilee Martin Murilee Martin on Sep 05, 2022

      I think the Draken only looks good from certain angles, while the Viggen looks good no matter where you are.


  • Collin Hayward Collin Hayward on Aug 31, 2022

    What junkyard is this in? Id love to save the poor thing


  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next