Toyota's Hino Motors Confesses to Diesel Emissions Cheating [UPDATED]

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

A few years ago, you couldn’t sneeze in an elevator without it landing on at least one automotive executive in trouble for diesel emissions cheating. Following Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal in 2015, regulators around the globe smelled blood in the water and the feeding frenzy began. Diesel cars that were previously championed as the cleaner alternative in Europe were now public enemy number one. Manufacturers responsible for long-lasting engines with high efficiencies were subjected to enhanced scrutiny. It was something of a sooty witch hunt and has gradually lost steam as the world found new, more immediate things to be outraged with.

But that doesn’t mean nobody has been checking up on them. Hino Motors, Toyota’s truck and bus arm, has confessed that it caught itself cheating after launching an internal investigation into its North American operations. Apparently, some products that should have been subject to Japan’s 2016 emission regulations were not — among some other issues.

“Based on the findings to date, Hino believes that it failed to appropriately respond to internal pressures to achieve certain targets and meet schedules that were placed on Hino employees,” the company explained in a prepared statement.

Hino has frozen sales of its Ranger, Profia, and S’elega products in Japan, citing that fuel economy ratings tabulated during testing had been tampered with by engineers. The manufacturer apologized profusely (at least for a corporate press release) and said that it would be treating the matter without the utmost seriousness.

Though Hino might not be quite so innocent as it first seems. For starters, it didn’t actually discover the problem. U.S. regulators had reportedly already flagged some inconsistencies with the company’s emission reporting, leading to the Department of Justice launching an investigation. But the release pens it as the if its the other way round:

After internally identifying potential issues regarding certification testing to determine the emissions performance of on-road engines for the North American market, Hino voluntarily commenced an investigation led by outside counsel and provided an initial report of its findings to the relevant regulators. Subsequently, the U.S. Department of Justice commenced an investigation. Hino is fully cooperating with investigations by the relevant authorities.

Hino then expanded the scope of the investigation to include a review of emissions certification procedures for engines certified to Japanese regulatory standards. In conjunction with that investigation, Hino has also conducted verification testing of engine performance including emissions and fuel economy.

Hino has identified misconduct related to the certification procedures for multiple engine models subject to the 2016 emissions regulations (so-called ‘post- post- new long-term regulations’; the “2016 Emission Regulations”) and fuel economy standards in Japan and found problems in engine performance. Therefore, Hino has decided to suspend the sale of the A05C (HC-SCR), A09C, E13C engines and vehicles equipped with those engines. While Hino also identified a problem concerning the fuel economy performance of the N04C (Urea-SCR) engine, no misconduct in relation to its certification testing has been identified to date.

[Update 3/10/2022: Hino reached out to us to complain about the way we framed the timeline to suggest the DOJ was likely the first one to flag the problem, despite having no issue with us accusing it of emissions cheating in the headline. The spokesperson seemed particularly perturbed that we didn’t cite anyone else claiming government regulators were first to the punch and assumed this wasn’t a wholly voluntary confession. That makes this a matter of he-said-she-said, which is often what news tends to end up being anyway. But we endeavor to be as honest as possible and have to acknowledge the possibility that the corporate chimps working for Hino may be telling the truth.

For what it’s worth the DOJ has only said that its investigation was “independent” of the company, which does not automatically preclude Hino from flagging fist. But there are other outlets making similar claims that regulators shot first (here’s one from MotorBiscuit and another from The Japan Times that’s a little murkier). Either way, it’s always worth doing some follow-up research on your own and never assuming any one story is totally settled.]

Regulators are typically overbearing and often out of touch. But automakers aren’t angels and have occasionally endangered their own customers in an effort to protect profits. That makes this issue fairly minimal in the grand scheme of things. But Hino’s excuse is so close to VW’s back when it had to explain its own emissions cheating that I’m hesitant to call this an oversight on the part of the manufacturer.

The company has said it’s sold at least 150,000 vehicles to customers that it believes might need to be recalled, with the initial steps having already been taken. The biggest issue is trucks producing more NOX emissions than regulators officially allow and vehicles being listed with fuel economies that were not representative of real-world driving. Hino said it will be more mindful in the future and will be establishing a special committee consisting of independent experts that will propose corrective measures to their engine development processes.

[Image: Art Konovalov/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 20 comments
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Mar 08, 2022

    VW got caught because some college professors and students hooked up an emission sensor to a car and drove it. How hard is that for a government or OE ? Now we know why GM, Ford, etc never went all-in for passenger car diesel. BMW and Benz diesels in the US are problematic for carbon buildup...maybe different calibration ? I don't think BMW was involved in cheating, but the five figure bills to clean up a 335d heads and intake are a deterrent. For the record, I liked my TDi until the DPF cracked and I realized it wasn't the diesel Golf of old....but I did get checks !

    • See 1 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Mar 09, 2022

      @focus-ed nonsense. Those vehicles arent cheating. You don't like the standards get your representatives to change them.

  • Joesurfer Joesurfer on Mar 12, 2022

    No patience when I'm following people driving Buicks, Toyota or Hyundais.

  • Jkross22 Their bet to just buy an existing platform from GM rather than build it from the ground up seems like a smart move. Building an infrastructure for EVs at this point doesn't seem like a wise choice. Perhaps they'll slow walk the development hoping that the tides change over the next 5 years. They'll probably need a longer time horizon than that.
  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Next