Junkyard Find: 1997 Mercury Cougar XR7 30th Anniversary Edition
Ford’s Mercury Division built rear-wheel-drive Cougars from the 1967 through 1997 model years, followed by a 1999-2002 run of front-wheel-drive Cougars based on the Mondeo chassis. Today’s Junkyard Find is thus historically significant on three counts: it’s the last model year for the rear-wheel-drive Cougar, it’s a special edition commemorating the 30th anniversary of the debut of The Man’s Car, and it’s the last year for the XR7 luxury package. Bitter tears, indeed!
You might say that ditching rear-wheel-drive and then moving to a British platform after skipping a model year violated sacred Cougar tradition, but the one constant with the Cougar name was that Ford never worried about Cougar tradition. The car started out as a stretched and gingerbread-laden Mustang with cool-looking sequential taillights (1967-1973), then became a rococo-ized Torino (1974-1976), then a blinged-up LTD II with sedan and wagon versions added (1977-1979), followed by a semi-subdued Fox Platform version that— mercifully— returned to coupe-only form after a few years (1980-1988), then switched to the sophisticated MN12 platform of the Thunderbird/ Mark VIII for 1989 through 1997. In fact, the only Cougar that didn’t have a near-clone sold by Ford and/or Lincoln during all that time was the 1999-2002 generation, a sport compact that didn’t look anything like its Mondeo/ Countour platform-mates.
Ford created many special-edition cars to celebrate production milestones around this time, mostly for the Mustang (including the not-so-sought-after 35th Anniversary Edition). It appears that the Cougar had editions celebrating its 20th, 30th, and 35th anniversaries. Sadly, the Cougar was axed one year prior to the Ford Motor Company’s 100th birthday, so it never had a chance to be sold in “any color you like” black with Centennial Edition badges.
The 30th Anniversary Cougar was available only on the XR7— actually, all 1997 Cougars were XR7s— and it featured Toreador Red paint, leather/cloth seats with commemorative embroidery, and special aluminum wheels.
The 30th Anniversary Package added just $495 to the cost of a $17,830 car (that’s about $880 on a $31,795 car when reckoned in 2022 frogskins), which would have been worth it for the snazzy wheels alone. Until now, I thought today’s Junkyard Find was my first 30th Anniversary Cougar, but I now realize that the Florida Man Faux-Vertible XR7 in Toreador Red we admired nearly 10 years ago was such a car with
The only engine available in the 1994-1997 Cougar was Ford’s modern and (generally) very reliable 4.6-liter SOHC Modular V8. This engine was rated at 205 horsepower, 45 fewer than the 4.6 in the same-year Crown Victoria Police Interceptor I once owned.
The only years for a manual transmission in the MN12 Cougar were 1989 and 1990, though the manual returned for the Mondeo Cougars.
You’d have to be a Sajeev Mehta-grade Dearborn zealot to want to restore a 30th Anniversary XR7, and this car is in a Northern California yard thousands of miles from Houston. The Mustang-based Cougars still go for solid prices, and the Fox fanatics might rescue a 1980-1988 cat, but the MN12 cars don’t have tremendous value nowadays.
Still, the MN12s were the best-handling and probably the quietest members of the Cougar family, so we should give them respect.
All this handling… and the quality of a Mercury.
At 16, you got your mom’s station wagon with an 8-track player. At 22, you got an old rustmobile. Isn’t it time you got a real car?
Kate Jackson uses an interesting pronunciation of “Mercury” in this ad.
For links to more than 2,200 additional Junkyard Finds, please visit The Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.
[Images via the author.]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
If I remember right, the last rendition of the Cougar before it went away was originally intended to be the third gen Probe
Yes, this was the year I almost bought one. Had a really good price advertised in the paper. Black and white ad, of course and I'll explain why that is relevant... Thanks to the links in the article to the original brochure, I can now describe *exactly* what was wrong with the car. It was *arctic green* with a *willow green* interior. The sales guy told me the dealership was forced to take delivery of a range of colours, hence why they got this. I was more thinking somebody ordered this thing and then saw what it looked like and backed out of the deal.