General Motors Says Heavy Duty Electric Pickups Are Coming

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

General Motors has made another proclamation at CES 2022, this time providing a timeline for electric variants of its heavy-duty pickups. HD EVs are scheduled for 2035, which just happens to be the same time it has promised to have phased out gasoline engines. Presumably, that means the hardest working of GM’s work vehicles will also be the very last models to go all-electric.

“As previously announced, our plan is to have all new light-duty vehicles be electric by 2035,” GM CEO Mary Barra said during her keynote address. “And today, I’m pleased to announce that we’ll introduce all-electric heavy-duty vehicles on that same timetable.”

The automaker entered into an agreement with five other automakers during the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held in November to end gas vehicle sales by 2040. Signatories included Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover, Chinese automaker BYD, and a slew of fleet operators hoping to do continued business in thirty nations that likewise signed various, non-binding environmental commitments.

That provides GM with some additional time to continue selling HD pickups utilizing liquid fuel. But it’s hard to take any of these climate promises totally seriously in the first place. China has once again stalled commitments and placed itself on a timeline that is decades behind the United States, despite the Eastern nation now being the worlds leader in air pollution buy a sizable margin. Though other groups have also made lopsided agreements and COP26 lacks any serious obligations, making the similarly unequal Paris Climate Agreements look positively ironclad in comparison.

I’m just taking the long way of telling you not to count on GM (or anybody else) sticking to the agreed-upon targets. Let’s not forget that General Motors made the very first mass-produced and purpose-designed electric vehicle in 1996, with suggestions that it would fundamentally change the industry, only to scrap the program a few years later and reclaim all the cars. It would take well over a decade for the company’s next EV to appear. Granted, there’s different leadership in place today and the whole industry is now committing itself to electrification. But automakers have a habit of doing what’s in their best interest, even if it means breaking a promise or five.

The relevant technologies also might not be there come target time. While EVs are making genuine headway in becoming directly comparable to internal combustion vehicles, manufacturers have continued to stress how to improve their ability to effectively haul heavy loads. A few years ago engineers from multiple Japanese automakers told me their biggest hurdle with EVs were finding ways to maximize energy density to a point where it wouldn’t dramatically sap overall range whenever large payloads were at play. Toyota outright said this situation actually contributed to its decision to prioritize hybridization, rather than focus entirely on battery electric vehicles.

Then again, we’re talking about something that’s over a decade away. GM knows that placing such a large buffer between promise and delivery gives it plenty of time to cram everything down the memory hole. However, if the current pace of battery development is retained, a 2035 Chevrolet Silverado HD EV certainly sounds plausible. After all, the 2024 Chevy Silverado EV is fast approaching and GM is probably already using R&D teams to increase the relevant specifications to make usable HD models in thirteen years.

I’m of the mind that the upcoming deluge of electric pickups is going to decide the fate of HD EVs, however. If the domestic market goes big on models like the Ford Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, and Chevrolet Silverado EV, then it seems assured that HD models will follow. But if those trucks turn out to be poorly suited for anything other than showing off to the neighbors (fun fact: Pickup trucks were originally working vehicles) then it seems less likely that there will be bigger models being planned for contractors in need of heavy lifting.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • 17andCounting 17andCounting on Jan 12, 2022

    Treat car companies like politicians: ignore what they say, watch what they do.

    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 12, 2022

      "Treat car companies like politicians: ignore what they say, watch what they do." I disagree. Question what they say. Verify what they say. Challenge what they say. Definitely watch what they do. Vote at the ballot box or vote with your purchase.

  • JimBot JimBot on Jan 12, 2022

    Why? Absolute waste.

  • ToolGuy I am slashing my food budget by 1%.
  • ToolGuy TG grows skeptical about his government protecting him from bad decisions.
  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
Next