Ford Pausing Reservations on Maverick Hybrid Until Summer

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
ford pausing reservations on maverick hybrid until summer

Ford’s sales success with the Maverick pickup has been undeniable. But if you’re in need of more evidence, the automaker has begun notifying dealerships to stop taking reservations on the base hybrid model because it doesn’t even think it can keep up with the existing backlog.

Both Automotive News and The Wall Street Journal reported on memos issued to dealers on Monday. The manufacturer has since confirmed the decision, saying it planned to reopen the order books on 2023 model year Maverick Hybrids this summer. This is being done to ensure it can produce enough pickups to address the backlog and hopefully convince more prospective buyers to ditch the $19,995 (before taxes, destination fees, or options) base pickup for the non-hybrid version that uses the 2.0-liter EcoBoost and costs a few grand more.

The turbocharged Maverick (250 hp) is noticeably more gutsy under acceleration, opens the door to several desirable options the hybrid (191 hp) is missing, and even doubles its maximum towing capacity to 4,000 pounds with the relevant equipment package. But it’s not quite the bargain the base model is and lacks the genuinely impressive efficiency ratings issued by the EPA. Turbocharged Mavericks are rated at 23 mpg city and 30 mpg on the highway, with all-wheel drive variants losing an additional 1 mile per gallon. Hybrids offer 42 mpg city and 33 mpg highway, making them ideal for drivers with a tight fuel budget.

“We didn’t want to take more orders than we could build,” explained Dean Stoneley, general manager of Ford trucks. “We’re getting customers who would have perhaps bought a used car and are now buying the Maverick because it is so affordable.”

With used vehicle prices exceptionally high right now, dealers have been able to ask more for new vehicles as well. But the Maverick Hybrid represented a relatively good value, especially after domestic automakers culled economy cars a few years ago to maximize profitability. Considering the current state of the economy and the sizable uptick in fuel prices that took place in 2021, one could assume the Ford Maverick is gobbling up sales that would have otherwise gone to the small sedans and hatchbacks that had previously been removed from the North American market.

From WSJ:

Ford rolled out the Maverick last year as a more-manageable alternative to the big pickups that now dominate the U.S. market. The truck has drawn many first-time truck buyers who migrated from sedans or small SUVs, dealers said.

Ford in 2018 decided to eliminate from its lineup the cars that had long served as entry points for new car buyers, including the Fiesta and Focus, which were money losers, executives have said.

Ford’s move to ditch entry-level cars frustrated many dealers, who said it left them few options to offer shoppers for less than $30,000.

Other car companies have also followed suit in recent years, jettisoning budget small cars and hatchbacks from their showrooms and adding more higher-priced trucks and SUVs to fatten profit margins.

There are five nameplates in the U.S. today with an average sticker price of $20,000 or less, down from 19 a decade ago, research firm Cox Automotive said.

Chris Lemley, president of Sentry Auto Group, a Boston-area Ford-Lincoln-Mazda dealership, told WSJ that the decision to pause customer orders on a vehicle like the Maverick was unusual. But that it was also “appropriate under the circumstances” to avoid disappointing customers. He also said that the brunt of the pickups were currently trading in the mid-to-high $20,000 range.

“We desperately needed something in that price range,” Lemley concluded.

The good news is that the Maverick situation didn’t come out of the blue. Ford was aware that it was running out of Hybrids in December and would probably need to stop taking reservations on the 2023 model year if it couldn’t get more people to buy the more-expensive EcoBoost. The automaker said it will stop taking new orders on the Hybrid after January 27th to focus on existing bookings. It also hinted that it might attempt to expand capacity, though your author would wager Ford would prefer it if more people just bought the turbocharged version.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Join the conversation
2 of 47 comments
  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Jan 26, 2022

    quote: "...convince more prospective buyers to ditch the $19,995 (before taxes, destination fees, or options) base pickup for the non-hybrid version that uses the 2.0-liter EcoBoost and costs a few grand more" Naturally, it wouldn't occur to the Ford bean counters to cut the base price of the non-hybrid version to make it more attractive...

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jan 27, 2022

    Just got an email from Ford today bumping my Maverick production from the week of Feb 14 to the week of March 14. Ford is definitely not prepared for the launch of new vehicles and if Ford's future lies in customer orders it will be a big fail. Not many people will wait a year for their new vehicle to be produced. For now I am going to wait but if this goes beyond a year then I might look elsewhere and then I doubt I would ever buy another Ford.

  • ToolGuy VW (marque not group) and Tesla very nearly switched positions on a YTD basis.
  • RHD Inexpensive gasoline appears to be a thing of the past. ILO is correct - we have enough sunlight, wind and emerging ocean wave energy to power the entire country and then some. Clean air is nice, and being free of the whims of OPEC, geopolitics and hugely profitable oil companies will do all of us a world of good.
  • Raymond Segura Can you tell me where I can get the rear bumper for 69 impala?
  • Art Vandelay some of the crazy numbers I get. Percentages look bigger with any fluctuations with low volume makes and brands leaving the market will see massive month over month changes. But what’s with Buick? I still see the occasional ad on TV and yet the drop is disproportionate even compared to all the other GM brands.
  • Master Baiter "There is no mandate for consumers to buy EVs, not in any country or state. That’s made up."Right. And you are not mandated to purchase a toilet that only uses 1.6 gallons/flush. You could choose to not have a toilet--just go in the woods, like the bears do.