Tesla's Autopilot Gets a Closer Look Due to Lawsuits, NYT

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
tesla s autopilot gets a closer look due to lawsuits nyt

The New York Times went deep over the weekend on a subject that has long been talked about in this industry — Tesla’s Autopilot and its failures.

In this case, the paper of record goes in-depth and talks to people who are suing the company over crashes in which Autopilot is alleged to have failed.

The Times piece asserts something that more than a few auto journos I follow on Twitter — including, if my memory of reading his tweets is correct, one who once held the title I have at TTAC — have been screaming about for some time now. Namely, that it seems to be past time for the nation’s regulatory bodies to intervene. The paper reports that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has around a dozen open investigations into accidents involving Autopilot. It also reminds us at least three drivers of Teslas have been killed in crashes where Autopilot was engaged and didn’t detect obstacles since 2016.

NHTSA has said that at least 10 people have been killed in eight crashes involving Autopilot since 2016.

The Times piece further details how Autopilot isn’t a self-driving system and how drivers are supposed to remain aware and alert while using it — and that many don’t.

The National Transportation Safety Board says the system needs more safeguards and better driver monitoring, though we’ve worried about the privacy concerns involved in the latter in the past.

Other carmakers’ similar systems shut down if they detect the driver isn’t paying attention. We’ve also noted recently that the system seemingly can be cheated.

You might be wondering why the Times is just now seeming to cover an issue that has been covered extensively in the automotive press, and it looks to this author like the article is simply a detailed round-up of previously reported issues, one that looks into the human cost of the aftermath of some of these crashes. In other words, it reports very little new news but puts together disparate pieces of information in a one-stop shop for readers unfamiliar with the broader conversation around Tesla and self-driving.

The broader picture is this — if the Times piece has an impact with the right people among the powers that be, perhaps we could be moving closer to a future in which the regulatory bodies become more involved in making sure these systems are safe.

Tesla’s Autopilot has been controversial for several years. And its safety record is in question. Regardless of what you think of Tesla and/or Autopilot and/or autonomous driving, it seems reasonable to suggest that the brighter the spotlight shines on Autopilot (and competing systems offered by other carmakers), the more we’ll learn about the safety of it and systems like it.

[Image: Tesla]

Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Ol Shel Ol Shel on Jul 06, 2021

    The public knows what an autopilot system does. Tesla falsely claims that it has autopilot. It misleads the users and the public. Yeah, yeah, you're happy that 'dumb' people are dying, because you think they deserve it. Thankfully, you're just an internet expert, and not a judge. Eventually, Musk's arrogance will catch up to him, and he will have to pay -literally- for it.

    • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Jul 07, 2021

      So, what exactly does the public know that autopilot does and what does the public think an autopilot does?

  • Mustangfast Mustangfast on Jul 06, 2021

    It is a bit disingenuous to call it autopilot and could lead to them being liable in these cases despite legal language. Especially considering customers paid extra for this supposedly superior option. Other makers brand theirs “copilot 360, i activesense, eyesight” etc that don’t carry the connotation of doing everything for you. Of course many people made money in Tesla stock, so I’d doubt it’s going to be an easy thing to change. I wonder if those who paid for it could demand a refund if their car is past its useful life and still no full autonomous driving?

  • Dukeisduke Oh, and I have one of those Chinese Club knockoffs - I got one recently for my youngest daughter's 2012 Forte Koup, that was for six years my oldest daughter's ride. It got her through her senior year of high school, four years of undergrad, and her one-year Master's program. She was then gifted my mother-in-law's 2017 Elantra Limited. It has pushbutton start, so it's not susceptible to the Kia Boyz thing.The "Club" is still in the package - there's no way in hell she's gonna remember to put that thing on every time she parks it.
  • Dukeisduke That instrument cluster is lame, like something out of an S-10 pickup.And why is the Purple Pantsuit Guy video still up? Is that some kind of punishment?
  • SCE to AUX "The MSRP for a 1992 Camaro RS coupe with 5.0, 5-speed and T-Top roof was $13,339 (about $29,655 after inflation)."That's a remarkable price, even for a base model. But even then people knew these weren't very good cars.However, kudos to this one for going the distance.
  • Oberkanone Install immobilizer for all affected Hyundai Kia. At no cost. Offer loyalty incentive $1000 toward new Hyundai Kia to all affected owners. Apologize.Road to redemption begins here. I believe Kong Fuzi would advise failure to fix the vehicles will result in greater damage to Hyundai and Kia.
  • KOKing Huh, I figured by end of production the TBI 305s were all gone. It just seems like by then every one had that 'TUNED PORT INJECTION' badge on the rear bumper.