Tesla Opening Charging Network to Other Brands

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Tuesday, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that his company’s proprietary charging network would be opened up to other brands by 2022. It’s something Europe has been pressing the automaker on for years and a topic that’s become increasingly popular in the United States. Tesla announced it had completed over 25,000 charging points this year and most Western governments have committed themselves to advance electrification whether or not consumers or the industry feels ready.

But the charging infrastructure necessary to support the transition isn’t in place, leaving countries to craft grand infrastructure programs that cost taxpayers a literal fortune. Meanwhile, various energy concerns and automotive giants have attempted to build charging networks of their own under names like ChargePoint, Blink, or Electrify America. These public charging stations have helped support EVs that don’t wear the Tesla badge while establishing an entire subcategory of mobile apps designed specifically for finding them. But it hasn’t helped standardize charging, which some see as a major hurdle for EVs. Opening up Musk’s Superchargers might go a long way toward achieving something greater, albeit at some expense to his own clientele.

Tesla is inarguably the king of electric vehicles. Love or hate the brand, it’s the one that brought battery-driven vehicles into the mainstream and this was made possible due partially to the fact that it was building its own charging network.

“We created our own connector, as there was no standard back then & Tesla was only maker of long range electric cars. It’s one fairly slim connector for both low & high power charging,” Musk explained via Twitter. “That said, we’re making our Supercharger network open to other EVs later this year.”

After scouring the dregs of social media, Tesla owners seem to be annoyed that something that was originally seen as a perk (a charging network all to themselves) will now be handed out freely to lesser members of the EV community. There are worries that charging lines will become the norm at Tesla-branded stations. Some are also accusing it of breaking its promise of offering a lifetime of free charging to certain customers — an issue that has come up before. While we’re not sure how the latter issue plays into this, the former is undoubtedly something that could become a problem for Tesla owners that previously enjoyed the VIP treatment.

Tesla leaned into this too, often advertising its products of having the advantage of using their exclusive charging stations. Though it was often hinted at that this was a way to rope in customers when EV adoption was practically nonexistent. It’s also already possible for other EVs to use its network using adaptors (e.g. the J1772 connector), leaving only the slickest high-speed chargers for Tesla customers.

Musk did not specify which countries would be the first to see universally available charging. However, he did state that it would eventually be the status quo in all countries with the first examples taking place in 2021. Tesla has also been rumored to have been in discussing opening its Supercharger network with various European countries, making us think that’ll be the region that’s up to bat first.

We’re also feeling pretty secure in assuming this could set the company up for new government subsidies. It already makes a mint selling carbon credits to its rivals and announced $518 million in revenue from sales of regulatory credits in the first quarter of 2021. Sharing its network could result in new tax exceptions, regulatory crediting, and government grants.

[Image: JL IMAGES/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 42 comments
  • Mcs Mcs on Jul 22, 2021

    "We’re also feeling pretty secure in assuming this could set the company up for new government subsidies." Exactly. All of those new chargers the government wants to fund won't be proprietary. To get that money, Tesla has to open up. That being said, the odds of my next EV being a Porsche or EQS just went up a bit.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Jul 22, 2021

      @SCE: The problem is sometimes sanity takes over and I realize I'm spending 6 figures on a daily driver that's going to get beat on and I go cheap. So, we'll see. I've been back and forth on what EV to get next for a daily driver. A wide range of vehicles from the EV6 to the EQS. I can afford something expensive, but not sure I want to have something I worry about in a parking lot. That's the whole idea of having the daily driver. Something that can take a beating on a daily basis while the toys stay in the garage most of the time.

  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Jul 23, 2021

    Yet another bait-and-switch pulled by Musk on current Tesla owners. So much for your exclusive charging network. You can sit in your Model S Plaid and wait in line behind Ma and Pa Kettle charging their Bolt.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next