Tesla Sued Over Supercharging Fees, Broken Promises

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
tesla sued over supercharging fees broken promises

Tesla is being sued in California by an owner that’s claiming the automaker broke its promise of a lifetime of free charging after it started imposing fees upon people who allowed their cars to sit at stations for too long. For those of you that don’t recall, Tesla began rolling out its Supercharger network in 2012 and promised unlimited free charging as a way to entice early adopters. While it doesn’t pertain to all vehicles and has existed in various incarnations, gratis electricity was available on most properly equipped Model S and Model X purchased by 2016. But the deal has existed in various incarnations through 2020 and has been confusing customers almost as much as the apparently bogus self-driving suite.

As the brand became more popular, you’d start seeing Tesla owners populating Supercharging stations in greater numbers and chattering about their interests. Unfortunately, those extended diatribes on the merits of TEDx and spending a fortune on minimalist interior home design resulted in stations being occupied but going unused. To discourage this Tesla began imposing fines in 2016, noting that it hoped never to make money on the updated arrangement.

This is what encouraged Kevin Shenkman to sue the automaker in California state court. According to Bloomberg, Shenkman is attempting to represent all early Tesla adopters in the suit and would like the company to stop the practice of imposing charging fees. He’s also seeking punitive damages for what he believes is the company going back on its word and reimbursement for anyone who was promised free charging and had to pay a fine.

Alameda County court documents allege that Tesla’s often come into effect swiftly after the vehicle has accumulated its full charge, allotting an insufficient period for a driver to return to the car. While that wouldn’t be too bad if you only had to walk away for a couple of minutes, Tesla owners might have to leave the car alone for an hour to recoup the maximum amount of electricity. Meanwhile, the company offers a feature that allows motorists to check the status of proprietary charging stalls in advance with a fair degree of accuracy.

Loitering fees come into play instantly and tack on anywhere from fifty cents to a dollar per minute, depending on how full the station happens to be. If you manage to move the car within the first five minutes, all charges are supposed to be nullified.

Considering all of the above, it seems as though both the company and the customer should be able to navigate the issue without entering into a legal battle. If you’re keeping tabs on your vehicle, you should be able to get it unplugged within five minutes. Of course, Tesla probably doesn’t need to be charging people 50 cents a minute for letting their car linger in an otherwise empty lot.

Of course, Shenkman is claiming this is a matter of principle and effectively accusing the automaker of lying to its customers since it’s effectively barring people from free charging if they think the “congestion fees” are out of whack.

“To compound the matter, when a customer, such as plaintiff, who has been promised free Supercharging for life, refuses to pay such ‘Supercharger fees,’ Tesla cuts off Supercharging access entirely, thus disabling a feature for which customers paid thousands of dollars extra to obtain,” Shenkman told the court.

This isn’t the first time something like this has happened either. Tesla was previously been chided by independent repair shops and owners for digitally stripping vehicles of content after they hit the secondhand market. Despite the original owners having paid for things like Full-Self Driving (FSD) and Autopilot, the company decided that those items didn’t necessarily need to be carried over to subsequent owners — despite its own customer service department saying otherwise.

But it would be a mistake to target Tesla exclusively. These are trends that are becoming increasingly commonplace with manufacturers and are likely to accelerate as over-the-air updates and data sharing become ubiquitous features of the modern automobile. If you’re not interested in having carmakers charge you to digitally unlock features already installed in your vehicle (likely via subscription fees) or hit you with punitive fines for living your vehicle somewhere, you might want to make your voice heard or get ready for a lifetime of buying increasingly ancient vehicles.

Ah, the marvels of automotive connectivity. Unparalleled convenience all focused in a way that burdens the customer.

[Image: Welcomia/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
3 of 45 comments
  • Kendahl Kendahl on Jun 27, 2021

    The problem for BEVs is an insufficiency of chargers. The Tesla Supercharger network in the US is about 1,000 locations. That's an impressive accomplishment and a testament to the company's wisdom in realizing that, without a cross country charging network, its products could never be more than secondary vehicles limited to local errands. Without the network, size and luxury would be the only differences between a Model S and a Leaf. By comparison, there are about 180,000 gas stations. That works out to one station for every 17 square miles. Obviously, the distribution is not uniform and there are still a few highways with signs that read, "No services for XX miles" where XX is a number approaching 100. Nevertheless, it's almost never necessary to plan your trip around fuel stops. With a BEV, you absolutely do have to plan your trip around recharging points. The Tesla Supercharger network consists of clusters of chargers in urban areas connected by strings of chargers in rural areas to get you from one urban cluster to the next. On the east and west coasts, there are so many strings that everything begins to resemble a huge cluster. If that's where you live and drive, you're never very far from a Supercharger. It's much different in the western mountain states. There are Superchargers along the east-west interstates in North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas but not in between them. A BEV owner who wants to stray off the interstates is pretty much limited to half his vehicle's real world range. Consider the little town of Weeping Water, population 1,100, about 30 miles south of Omaha in Nebraska. There are two gas stations in town, one of which is open at all hours. There are also 24-hour gas stations in Louisville, 12 miles north, and Syracuse, 17 miles south. The nearest Superchargers are in Council Bluffs, across the Missouri River from Omaha, and in Topeka, Kansas. Until there are Superchargers or their equivalents in Louisville, Weeping Water and Syracuse plus Nebraska City, Auburn, Sabetha and Holton, BEVs will remain niche vehicles and those who own them will be early adopters much like the owners of ICE vehicles in the early 20th century. Dwight Eisenhower's support of a national interstate highway system stemmed in part from his struggles as commander of a 1919 military convoy from Washington, DC to San Francisco.

    • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Jun 28, 2021

      How much of the total U.S. population do you think ever visits places like Weeping Water? (If you actually live there, you'll have plenty of room for a home charger.) The networks to watch are the big non-Tesla ones. At current rates of expansion within a few years they will have all of the interstate system and most high-volume secondary routes covered. At that point the set of people that really can't get places with an EV will be pretty small. The tradeoff will be everyday convenience vs. slower road trips.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Jun 28, 2021

    I don't live in Weeping Water but I live in flyover territory. I worry that rural America will bear the cost of a city technology (EV vehicles) while being taxed more for gas /road use in the near future. I got into a semi-heated argument with a buddy regarding his new Tesla X winged, and he mentioned that Tesla had over 20,000 superchargers and my eyes widened.And then he mentioned the Tesla dealer told him you won't be ablt to buy a IC car in 10 years. I laughed, and he postured. Later that evening I realized that this encompassed only 1200 locations with several per location. Thats ok because in 2021 EV doesn't fit my driving habits (200 mile rural commute 2 weeks a month) nor aspirational.

  • Dot65699986 Making money online is more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I received $18376 last month. It's an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office jobs and even a little child can do this and earn money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page..... 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝟐𝟒.𝐜𝐨𝐦
  • Tassos extinct. It is a mickey mouse vehicle -toy that was always extinct for me. Its current interior room is fit only for small females. No wonder it is very popular with chicks. An Adult male can fit in, but can';t comfortably stretch on a longer trip, not to mention the non-existing trunk. The stupid car does not even have room for a young couple and their weekend luggage. So, it's JUST A TOY. When you grow up, you want something much more than a DAMNED TOY. Zoom-zoom?
  • Theflyersfan I need to find the numbers but I remember reading that when back in 2020 when global lockdowns took hold, Mazda had the best sales year in years on the MX-5 given people wanted to drive something fun, top down, and get outdoors given everything indoors was closed. I daily my 2022 MX-5 RF GT and in 11 months, have just broken 15,000 miles. It's been out east twice, all over parts of the Midwest, and does my daily commute. All to the tune of 34-35 mpg in mixed driving, compliments at stoplights and getting gas (the Soul Red looks so good on that car), and with excellent winter tires, got me through the light snow and moderate ice on my way into work this morning. I'm able to fit two carry-on size bags, one large backpack, and some odds and ends in trunk. One of the few things I wish I could change is interior storage. Why Mazda couldn't carve out door pockets or install nets is beyond me. The center cubby can only hold so much. The stereotype of this being a chick car, a sorority car, etc., died a long time ago. It is a track car, one you can have serious fun in, one you can take on trips, cheap to fuel (even with wanting 93 octane) and insure, and still looks good. If you love to drive, and are at a stage where you can live with this as a daily, don't mind renting something larger if you need it, and know how to drive a stick and want some fun, get one. New, used, whatever. And I'll add my future predictions in the new MX-5 posting.
  • FreedMike It shouldn't be offered in the color shown in that picture, for starters. Make them all Soul Red. I would say there should be two: a "classic" Miata with conventional power, and an EV version. Imagine a Miata with 300 lb/ft of instant torque. I'd be interested.
  • Bobby D'Oppo A relatively mild price increase over the CX-9 for what appears to be a genuine, thoroughly premium effort from them. The styling looks understated and handsome to my eye, but is understated really what a buyer in this class wants today?