Uber Promises Fleet-wide Electrification by 2030, GM Offers Help

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Uber Technologies has promised to make sure that 100 percent of the vehicles used to convey customers in Europe, Canada, and the United States will be powered entirely by electricity — allotting itself just under a decade for the transition. By 2030, Uber said all cars used on the platform will be required to be of the plug-in variety. At the same time, General Motors announced it would be helping drivers get there by offering juicy discounts on items they’ll be required to buy in preparation for the coming change. That seems incredibly convenient, especially for the purveyors of these soon-to-be-mandatory products.

On Tuesday, CEO Dara Khosrowshahi noted he wanted Uber to help lead a “green recovery” in the wake of the coronavirus lockdowns that resulted in an American unemployment rate not seen since the Great Depression. He acknowledged how nice the air had gotten in urban environments (Manhattan still smells like expired milk, FYI) and suggested going back to the before times would be a mistake. We were practically cave people prior to 2020 and have metamorphosed into a higher state of being.

From Uber:

But carbon emissions will return to “normal” soon. When two-thirds of the world’s population was under lockdown in early April, carbon emissions fell 17 [percent] compared to last year. By June, the drop was only 5 [percent]. And the fires that continue to rage across our home state of California are a sobering reminder of the urgency of the climate crisis.

Instead of going back to business as usual, Uber is taking this moment as an opportunity to reduce our environmental impact. It’s our responsibility as the largest mobility platform in the world to more aggressively tackle the challenge of climate change. We want to do our part to build back better and drive a green recovery in our cities.

While we’ve taken some important steps in recent years, from expanding micromobility options to offering public transit in the Uber app, we know we’ve got a long way to go. That’s why we’re working with the World Resources Institute, Transport & Environment (T&E), and others to become a stronger partner in the fight against climate change by leveraging our innovation, technology, and talent to expedite the global transition to clean energy.

California’s transition to clean energy doesn’t seem to have stopped those wildfires and has technically diverted billions in funding from energy grid maintenance (and upgrades) for years. This has resulted in occasional blackouts as providers enact shutdowns in an attempt to avoid creating more fires whenever there’s a drought or simply because someone failed to buy sufficient juice in advance. But we’ll not continue poking holes in Uber’s general claims when its offering specific details on its evolving business policies. We just want it to be known that energy management is a mess in California right now and at least one company is proposing all of its drivers buy EVs before 2030.

Of course, that’s just for starters. Uber has similarly vowed to become a carbon-neutral platform (on a global scale) by 2040 — something we’d rank between incredibly difficult and practically impossible. Truth be told, we don’t expect any company making these kinds of claims to ever achieve them. They just look good in a press release and make it seem as though tons of hard work is being done before the promise is swiftly flushed down the old memory hole.

But they’re frequently accompanied by financial commitments and Uber said it would be spending $800 million in resources “to help hundreds of thousands of drivers transition to EVs by 2025.” It also wants to expand its own “multimodal network” to promote sustainable alternatives to personal vehicle ownership and be transparent/accountable as a company.

Look, I will happily swallow the self-serving polls Uber shares to undermine updated California employment laws it doesn’t want to comply with (there may be some truth there). But framing itself as a green company is a bridge too far. The entire business model involves contractors constantly cruising around an urban landscape while they wait for customers. We’ll chalk it up to a necessary evil but numerous studies have proven ride-hailing platforms congest roadways while contributing to air pollution. Forcing drivers to transition into EVs may help eliminate smog directly overhead but the issue will be moved largely elsewhere as power plants are kicked into overdrive to compensate for the above-average draw.

On the upside, most electric vehicles on sale in 2030 should be able to recharge within a handful of minutes and hold enough juice to operate all day in a major metropolitan area if they continue evolving at the present pace. But Uber wants drivers to begin making the swap ASAP, encouraging General Motors to come to the rescue.

GM said it would be teaming up with Uber to offer employee pricing on a brand-new Chevrolet Bolt. Customers just need to prove they’re contracted by the company. It likewise suggested they’d be good for a 20 percent discount on EV accessories (e.g. home-charging systems). Combined with local subsidies designed to get customers into EVs, it should be the cheapest way to get into one that doesn’t involve grand theft auto — even if the automaker already has exhausted its federal tax credit quota.

“Improving access to EVs for on-demand service providers can help reduce overall tailpipe emissions in cities across the country and help accelerate widespread EV adoption,” Sigal Cordeiro, GM executive director of Sales and Marketing for Global Innovation, said in a statement. “Our collaboration with Uber will facilitate drivers’ switch to an EV, empowering these drivers, their passengers and communities to experience electric vehicles and contribute to cleaner air in our cities.”

[Image: MikeDotta/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 23 comments
  • MKizzy MKizzy on Sep 09, 2020

    Uber's making a lot of bets here. Does Uber really think EV adoption AND the required supporting fast-charging infrastructure (chargers, chargers, everywhere!) would be widespread enough to assume that thousands of "contractors" under its thumb could afford to own or lease EV's of the shapes, size, and range needed to service its customers with a 100% EV fleet? Unlikely.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 09, 2020

    I have no intention to discuss all the BS statements on this thread but according to my reliable sources by 2030 every new car purchase will be required to be EV. Required by who? Required by California or/and Federal Governments.

    • Old_WRX Old_WRX on Sep 09, 2020

      "2030 every new car purchase will be required to be EV." Wouldn't be surprising. I'm sure the people behind the push to EV's desperately need the money it will make them. The question is: What urgent thing that needs to be done to save personkind will they use next to move money from our pockets to their pockets? No need to worry; they'll find something. They always do. Khosrowshahi used a lot of good buzz words/phrases here: leveraging (a long and tired way of saying "using"), sustainable, micromobility (does that mean moving tiny distances or moving tiny things?), carbon emissions (I assume they mean CO2 not charcoal briquets). But, he failed to get the word "synergy" in there. I think the cab business should be left to real cab companies. Uber has always impressed me as nothing but a grand rip-off.

  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
Next