California Blinks: Uber/Lyft Granted Extension on New Labor Laws

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
california blinks uber lyft granted extension on new labor laws

The battle between the purveyors of ride-hailing apps and the State of California has been an interesting one. The West Coast’s gig economy looked ready to be nuked from orbit following the passing of Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), leaving a glassy crater of jobless part-timers and the corporations that were dependent upon them — even though the stated goal of the rule was to protect gig workers from being taken advantage of.

Uber and Lyft looked to be the most impacted by the new law, as their entire business structure revolves around managing fares for drivers whose status as “independent contractors” was up for debate.

Claiming that hiring drivers as full-fledged employees would make the existing business model untenable, Uber and Lyft suggested they were looking into alternative solutions while fighting legal battles that would effectively make them exempt from the new law. San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman threw cold water on that concept when he ruled against the duo, saying drivers were essential to ride-hailing operations and needed to be treated as regular employees receiving the full benefits they’re entitled to.

The corporations’ last hope was double down on threat to leave the state and hope a California appeals court would grant them an extension to stage another legal fight, or just comply with AB5… which is exactly what happened on Thursday afternoon.

This break gives Uber and Lyft until 5 p.m. (PT) on Tuesday to craft written statements agreeing to expedited procedures stated in the order and explaining in detail how and when they’ll achieve compliance. However, based on their corporate rhetoric, we don’t think that’s their ultimate goal. Both companies have brought up how a large portion of drivers oppose having set schedules and would prefer to work as part-time contractors, even if that means they’re not entitled to benefits. This is undoubtedly true for a subset of workers, as many drive as a secondary job, but there’s also been an ongoing push within the community to grant contractors benefits and better pay.

While Lyft said it would have to abandon its California operations without the extension, Uber had not announced any official decision to suspend service prior to the order — though it was heavily hinted at. Both will be staying put in California now that they’ve gotten their extension, however.

“We are glad that the Court of Appeals recognized the important questions raised in this case, and that access to these critical services won’t be cut off while we continue to advocate for drivers’ ability to work with the freedom they want,” an Uber spokesperson said in response to the extension.

The extensions have several stipulations, with one of the biggest being the requirement of CEOs to submit sworn statements by September 4th confirming plans to comply with the preliminary injunction within 30 days of a ruling if the appeals court affirms the preliminary injunction and if Proposition 22 (the ballot measure that would exempt the firms from AB5 entirely) fails to pass. The ride hailing firms undoubtedly hope that it will, and have asked supporters to back Prop 22 in order to continue operations as normal.

Another possible alternative would be to simply make sure Uber/Lyft drivers can be classified as truly independent. Yet we don’t think this is feasible under the current business models. For starters, the companies would effectively have to prove drivers were supplemental to salaried and hourly employees and effectively give them total freedom in the negotiation of fare rates. Neither of those outcomes seem particularly likely, and both occurring together sounds next to impossible.

The companies seem more likely to just wait an see how things shake out with Prop 22. Assuming Uber and Lyft file the applicable documents at the proper time, California officials will have to issue a response by September 18th. From there, there will be a few weeks for everyone to prepare for their court appearances on October 13th. During this time, the firms will also be engaged with a suit from the California Labor Commissioner alleging they illegally denied wages to their workers by misidentifying them.

Their last-ditch effort to avoid compliance will likely be to lobby the U.S. Congress for favorable treatment. Considering their sizable financial backing, we’d be shocked if they weren’t already engaging in this.

However, if voters support Prop 22 and it passes then all of this goes away for the ride-hailing giants. Literally every ruling against them will simply evaporate and they can continue operations as they always have. Though it is likely that California drivers would be entitled to a handful of benefits and a minimum earnings quota tied to hour wages.

[Image: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.

More by Matt Posky

Join the conversation
4 of 9 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Aug 24, 2020

    When it comes to AB5, it's important to remember who authored it. Sorry, not who wrote it - that would be labor unions - but who presented it. That would be one Lorena Gonzalez. The same state rep from San Diego that fought against the ability for parents to send their kids to a better school district than their zip code dictated schools. Always follow the money. Always.

    • See 1 previous
    • PandaBear PandaBear on Aug 25, 2020

      @R Henry Funny, the righties were the ones who blame Uber and Lyft for reduced vehicle sales and all that is wrong with the automotive world, now they are blaming Uber and Lyft stranding everyone. They just like to point fingers on everyone.

  • PandaBear PandaBear on Aug 25, 2020

    They already IPO, the politically connected investors didn't pay enough to the politicians to bribe them off, now the taxi unions and medallion holders are trying to fight back and bribed the politicians. You know the rest.

  • Analoggrotto Buyers are skipping these in droves and heading down to sign the golden paperwork for a new Telluride. ATPs speak volumes and we have 'em. Our customers are telling us that we offer Mercedes quality for a better deal, and our suite of luxury features rivals any luxury automaker. Insult me all you want, but AVMs, DSDs and BSODs tell the truth.
  • Ted Lulis The Exodus from California is mind-boggling. No surprise from the rectum of the country
  • Mr Imperial Seeing the adjusted-for-inflation amount always makes me sick, I can't believe how much it has gone up in my 40-some-odd trips around the sun. Still fondly remember seeing these and Ford Explorers everywhere.
  • Kyl65759578 👋
  • ToolGuy I appreciate the thoughtful comments from the little people here, and I would like to remind everyone that Ford Motor Company offers a full range of vehicles which are ideal for any driving environment including New York City. The size and weight our of product portfolio has been fully and completely optimized to be friendly to the planet and friendly to pedestrians while consuming the bare minimum of resources from our precious planet (I am of course a lifelong environmentalist). Plus, our performance models will help you move forward and upward by conquering obstacles and limits such as congestion and your fellow humans more quickly at a higher rate of speed. I invite you to learn more at our website.Signed, William Clay Ford Jr.