Prepare Yourself for Another Huge Electric Vehicle IPO

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Xpeng announced Thursday a decision to increase the size of its U.S initial public offering (IPO) by more than a third after realizing Wall Street can swallow anything so long as it promises a greener tomorrow.

Co-founded in 2014 by two former executives from China’s GAC Group, the EV startup has already managed to produce around 20,000 vehicles for the Asian market. It also became engaged in an intellectual property dispute with Tesla (which claimed Xpeng stole its Autopilot source code) in 2019 and ran afoul with California’s Department of Motor Vehicles after failing to submit disengagement reports on its self-driving test vehicles in 2018.

Such hurdles don’t seem to have slowed the company’s rise to prominence, however. Xpeng is adept at fundraising, amassing well over a billion dollars through strategic partnerships in just the last two years. Meanwhile, the adjusted IPO filed on the New York Stock Exchange this August now targets a cool $1.5 billion USD.

It makes sense in the broader context. EV manufacturers frequently garner valuations that overshadow established automakers that are many times larger — and substantially more profitable. Xpeng itself only has two facilities located in China that produce its G3 sport-utility vehicle and brand-new P7 sedan. While we’ve never driven one (as it’s not sold in North America), the G3 has been praised for its build quality and impressive tech inclusions. Autocar even said it offered “near-Tesla levels of autonomous driving capability” in 2019.

There’s substantially less information floating around about the P7, but it’s clearly targeting the Tesla Model 3 and looks a lot like many other electric sedans we’ve seen debut in the last year or two. Porsche also helped develop the chassis, giving it some extra credibility as a performance model.

According to Reuters, Xpeng’s filing states that it will price its shares at $15 each. It originally suggested they’d go for between $11 to $13 when the deal was launched, however.

From Reuters:

The Guangzhou-based automaker had planned to sell 85 million American Depository Shares (ADS) but increased that to about 99.7 million shares following higher-than-expected demand from investors, according to the filing. Investors now value Xpeng at over $11 billion and its shares will start trading in New York on Thursday.

There is also a so-called greenshoe option in which another 14.96 million shares can be issued within the next 30 days that would allow Xpeng to raise a further $224.4 million.

BofA Securities, Credit Suisse, and J.P. Morgan. are joint bookrunners for the offering.

Xpeng CEO He Xiaopeng said the additional funding will be funneled into research and development and expanding sales. Vehicles (both future and present-day) are targeted between 150,000 yuan ($21,804) to 300,000 yuan to appeal to the market. Currently, that only includes China, though the business aspires to tackle both Europe and the United States.

[Image: helloabc/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 10 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 27, 2020

    Not sure why anyone would *want* Tesla's Autopilot code.

    • See 5 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 28, 2020

      @Inside: Chill; it's a half-joke. We all know the outcomes of people who mistake AP's Level 2 capabilities for FSD, which it is not. As much as I support Tesla, I have no interest in AutoPilot or vehicle autonomy in general.

  • PandaBear PandaBear on Aug 27, 2020

    In the age of hyper inflation, anything is worth that much money.

    • Luke42 Luke42 on Aug 28, 2020

      The only thing that is inflated at the moment are stock prices.

  • ToolGuy I am slashing my food budget by 1%.
  • ToolGuy TG grows skeptical about his government protecting him from bad decisions.
  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
Next