Junkyard Find: 2002 Saab 9-3 SE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

During my years of documenting discarded Saabs in junkyards around the country ( and in Saab’s homeland), I’ve managed to cover the pre-GM American-market models well enough, with a special focus on the 900. In recent years, I’ve been working to cover some of the Saabs from the period of General Motors influence (1989-2000) and control (2000-2010).

I may never find an example of the ultra-rare 9-4x, but it’s easy to find used-up Opel Vectra-based 9-3 these days — and I vowed to photograph the first one I saw on a recent Denver junkyard expedition. That car turned out to be this Silver Metallic 2002 9-3 SE hatchback.

The first-generation 9-3 was a renaming of the second-generation 900, and platform cousin to the Saturn L-Series cars sold here (and many Opels, Holdens, and Vauxhalls as well). I still see those GM-based 900s in my local car graveyards, so I’ll shoot one of those for a future Junkyard Find.

2002 was the last model year for the GM2900-based 9-3 (production of the Epsilon-based second-gen 9-3s continued until just before the demise of Saab). You could get the ’02 9-3 in two trim levels: SE ($27,995, which comes to about $41,000 in 2020 dollars) or the factory hot-rod Viggen ($38,095 for the five-door hatch). I don’t expect to find a Viggen in a U-Wrench yard any time soon, but I’ll keep my eyes open.

This car appears to have the $1,995 ($2,900 today) Premium package, with power seats, automatic HVAC controls, and an upgraded audio system. 2002 was part of that awkward period between the demise of cassette decks in (most) cars and the appearance of AUX jacks, so there was no easy way to connect a digital audio player into this radio. At least it has weather band, which often proves very useful here in Colorado.

The 2.0-liter turbocharged engine in this car made 205 horsepower, and its ancestry stretches all the way back to the Triumph Slant-4 engine of the late 1960s. The Viggen’s 2.3 made 230 horses, and we hope someone swaps a Viggen powertrain into a Saturn L200.

Viggen buyers had to get the 5-speed manual transmission, but those who bought the SE could choose between the five-on-the-floor and a four-speed automatic. American Saab buyers, like their Audi counterparts, were more likely to get three-pedal cars than those who bought Aleros or Maximas, but the slushbox still ruled the 9-3 world in 2002.

Exhilarating handling and gripping traction control, not to mention the addictive 205-horsepower turbo engine.

Just 234,000 kroner in 2000.

You’ll find links to 2,000 more Junkyard Finds at the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Carlos g Carlos g on Aug 26, 2020

    Very interesting article about the 93 almost a nostalgic view. I am happy to say that I currently own a 2002 93 SE convertible top with turbo and a manual transmission. Mine also has the top trim package (Digital climate control, Seat embossed with the "turbo" lettering. How about the 85k miles on the clock for a used car 18 years old? This was the one production vehicle celebrating the 25 years of Saab turbos lineage. Even after all those years, the car rides great (I have taken it to every twist and turn mountain I could find in CA leaving newer BMW, Lexus And the like far behind in those mountain curves. Yes in retrospect, the 93 SE is a time machine transporting you back to a time when cars were made for drivers and not for picking up groceries!

  • Bill h. Bill h. on Aug 27, 2020

    That looks to be a Steel Gray color rather than silver, identical to mine, which is still running well at 223k miles--on the original turbo too, but with the 5 speed. Mine is also Finnish production, my guess being that by late in the 2002 model year production of the last of these hatches and convertibles had been shifted there while the Swedish plants were being retooled for the kickoff of the 2nd gen 9-3 Sports Sedan. So I consider my 5-door one of the last of the old "liftback" style Saab cars that goes back beginning with the 70s Saab 99s.

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next