The Saab Car Brand is Dead. Mourn (Once Again) for Saab

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You can forget about ever buying a new car with the Saab name attached. That’s right, Swedeophiles, the name that conjures up happy memories of a quirky-but-attainable brand that hated column-mounted ignitions is officially dead.

National Electric Vehicle Sweden AB (NEVS), the Swedish holding company that bought up Saab Automobile’s assets in a 2012 bankruptcy sale, just announced it won’t sell any vehicles under the Saab name.

There won’t be a Swedish Spring after all. Not even in China.

NEVS produced a handful of electric Saab 9-3s using the vehicle’s old platform for a brief period in 2013-2014, but production stopped as the company filed for bankruptcy protection and went on the hunt for wealthy investors. It also lost the licensing agreement from the defunct brand’s parent company that allowed it to use the Saab name.

In a message published today on its website, the company states, “NEVS will be the trademark of the company’s products including the first electric vehicle based on the 9-3 platform with start in 2017. That means that NEVS will no longer use the Saab trademark.”

Last year, NEVS did what every struggling would-be automaker lists as their Plan A or B — it headed to China to search for cash. The company formed a strategic partnership with Chinese vehicle leasing company Panda New Energy and Chinese State Grid, the world’s biggest electric utility to build 150,000 electric cars and 100,000 electric commercial vehicles for that country’s vast market.

It wants to market vehicles worldwide, but for now, China is the company’s main focus.

No doubt, Scandinavian car aficionados will cry into their Nynäshamns Ångbryggeri Landsort Lager after reading this news, but NEVS isn’t too concerned.

With sincere respect to our history and heritage, we want to be recognized as ourselves – A sustainable mobility solutions provider who are committed to the environment with a focused growth plan with its own brand as a corner stone, stated Mattias Bergman, president of the company (and owner of a proud Swedish name), on the company’s website.

[Image: © 2015 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 79 comments
  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Jun 22, 2016

    So long SAAB, I will miss you. You were my favorite. Thanks for giving me something to aspire to. No one else has done so since.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Jun 22, 2016

    I always thought Subaru i.e.. Fuji Heavy industries should have bought out the remains of Saab. They could have been marketed as upper market Subarus to roughly the same demographic who wanted something a bit more upscale.

    • See 1 previous
    • Wolfsbane Wolfsbane on Dec 18, 2016

      I agree. I always thought a combination of Fuji, AKA Subaru, SAAB and the pre-FIAT ALFA Romeo would have made sense as a combination. Their cars all had a similar quirkiness. Unfortunately there wasn't a strong company in that mix. They all were in a similar position. But they could have made some great cars together.

  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Next