QOTD: Many Happy Journeys?
By now you’ve heard, been told, or simply noticed that the Dodge lineup for 2021 contains but three models: the Charger, Challenger, and Durango. A trifecta of AARP members, now endowed with as much horsepower as Fiat Chrysler could rustle up from its deep parts bin.
Gone for ’21, but hardly forgotten, is the Grand Caravan, a pioneer of the minivan segment and a stalwart Dodge model seemingly immune to inflation. We knew its demise was coming. Same goes for the other model axed for 2021 — the Dodge Journey — though the discontinuation of this vehicle isn’t nearly as likely to elicit tearful, glowing eulogies at the wake.
Perhaps you’d like to say a few words?
Yours truly had no reason to own or drive a Journey, but a friend and a family member both did. Let’s just say that their ownership experiences wouldn’t provide much in the way of useful fodder for Fiat Chrysler’s marketing team.
A smallish midsize crossover, the Journey, throughout its lifetime, offered buyers decent family and cargo capacity for very little money. In base, front-drive guise, a driver could close his or her eyes and be transported back in time, and not in a good way. Despite soldiering on, almost unchanged, from the 2009 model year to 2020, the vehicle’s DaimlerChrysler-Mitsubishi platform and base 2.4-liter World engine was straight out of the first term of the G.W. Bush administration.
The entry-level four-speed automatic transmission debuted in 1989, back when another Bush occupied the Oval office.
And yet you could pick up a new Journey for a song, something many buyers chose to do. Sales topped the six-figure mark in the U.S. in 2015 and 2016, and last year’s tally was still a respectable 74,686 units. Not bad for a model paid off long ago.
Also last year, a 2015 Journey purchased new by a relative for a jaw-droppingly low price was already showing its age. Rust arrived at the party unfashionably early, and your author could have poked his finger through its corroded, leaking oil pan, had he chosen to do so. Thankfully, that vehicle is no longer in the person’s possession.
Another base Journey entered my friend’s driveway some time ago, though the Magic of Journey meant that this friend soon traded it in for an uplevel 3.6-liter model for a lower monthly payment. One day, after his son went to retrieve a hat from the front seat, a not-too-harshly-slammed door caused the rear window to explode. It’s still in his possession, as the Pentastar engine has more things going for it than the vehicle itself.
It also paid itself off pretty damn quickly.
While the Journey might stage a reappearance in the near future, possibly underpinned by a platform sourced from some sporty Italians, the unchanging model we’ve come to accept as part of the automotive landscape is due to depart. So, as we gather today to remember our brother, the Journey, is there anyone here who would like to speak about its time spent with us? Any stories you’d like to share?
[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- EBFlex Garbage but for less!
- FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
- RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
- Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
- Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Comments
Join the conversation
Hardly a surprise. When the Journey's powertrain choices wee culled down to the 4 banger and 4 speed trans, and FCA announced layoffs at the trans plant because they were dropping the trans, the end was obviously here. I have never believed the chatter about a Stelvio based Journey. fwiw, I don't believe the chatter about a Giulia based Charger either. Now that they have officially stuck a fork in the Journey, lets see if they follow the Steve Plan: -replace the current, non-grand Cherokee with the Commander and Grand Commander: fresh styling and upgraded interior with the two row Commander replacing the non-grand Cherokee and the 3 row Grand Commander replacing the Journey. -with production capacity at Toluca freed up by replacing the Journey with the Belvidere built Grand Commander, drop the Italian built Renegade, because Toluca will be able to build enough Compasses to replace all the Renegades sold in North America, along with filling existing Compass demand. -with the non-grand Cherokee name freed up by it's replacement by the Commander, the replacement for the current 2 row Grand Cherokee can be simply the Cherokee, while the new 3 row that is supposed to be built at Mack Ave will be the Grand Cherokee, which will replace the current Durango. And there you have the Steve plan to make all FCA SUVs Jeeps.
We had the FIAT variant, 7 Seats, tri zone climate control. 6 speed 2.4. The best aspects? The family-friendly interior, storage space, booster seats easy exit and entry. The worst aspects, FCA/Dealers. Ultimately sold it. Why? No flair just wasn't singing for me anymore. I would still recommend one to anybody who carts around a lot of kids. Bought a HAVAL H9............