Nissan's CEO Explains Recovery Plan to Angry Investors

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
nissans ceo explains recovery plan to angry investors

Nissan CEO Makoto Uchida attempted to smooth things over with investors last week by going over his company’s new recovery plan in great detail. As you undoubtedly know by now, the automaker found itself in a less than blissful situation following an ugly internal power struggle that highlighted corporate corruption and a business strategy that seemed like a liability without ideal economic circumstances and the man who penned it running the show.

With its share price already suppressed by worsening sales performance and assumed “management issues” with alliance partner Renault, the internal scandal kicked off by the arrest of former chairman Carlos Ghosn November 2018 is what really sent Nissan’s stock into a tailspin. Shares have lost more than half their value since the incident.

This placed Uchida in the undesirable position of having to explain what went wrong and how to fix it. In the past, Uchida said he’d happily be fired if he can’t turn things around, though that’s usually what happens to CEOs who can’t deliver (or need to be scapegoated and sacrificed on the alter of commerce by their board). Based on comments made at the company’s most recent shareholder meeting, Uchida seems to understand how things work.

“I said, ‘If Nissan’s performance does not improve, please fire me. Please dismiss me,’ ” he reminded the crowd on June 29th. “That’s what I said. And this policy remains unchanged.”

Japanese speakers reported investors were more irritable than usual this time. Nissan shareholders had already been vocal regarding concerns of French influence, with many insisting Nissan is a Japanese company and should be ran as such. However, some are now looking back at Ghosn’s era of profitability with rose-tinted glasses. His often repeated claim that he was on the receiving end of a corporate coup supported by the Japanese government has also gained traction, with at last one investor openly addressing the matter during the meeting. Considering that the conspiracy claims only look more credible over time, this was hardly a surprise.

According to Automotive News, Motoo Nagai, head of Nissan’s auditing committee, denied there was any plot to remove Ghosn. “I know that in the media they have talked about this being a conspiracy. But there is no fact whatsoever to this argument,” Nagai said, adding that an independent external task force and law firm Nissan hired to investigate the matter both uncovered misconduct.

We’ve also seen other high-ranking officials at Nissan dismiss themselves over similar claims of financial malfeasance. Some involved in Ghosn’s supposedly planned ousting have been given diminished roles within the company, but Uchida spent the brunt of the meeting trying to prove that the recovery plan, dubbed Nissan Next, is a good one — and is moving forward with aplomb.

From Automotive News:

In his latest appeal, Uchida pledged that the midterm plan unveiled in May would restore the embattled carmaker to a growth trajectory, but he warned a full rebound still needed time.

One benchmark of recovery, he noted, would be a return to positive free cash flow. He predicted that would happen sometime between October 2021 and March 2022. Nissan, which just posted its first full-year net loss in 11 years, bled ¥641 billion ($5.95 billion) in cash from its core automotive business for the year. But Uchida said the net cash position is still flush enough to get the company through the COVID-19 pandemic thanks to newly secured lines of credit.

Uchida insisted the midterm plan plots a path to full recovery in four years. The plan aims to restore operating profit margin to 5 percent and increase global sales about 9 percent to 5.38 million vehicles for a 6 percent world market share. The strategy slashes costs and closes factories to reduce bloated global production capacity of 7.2 million to 5.4 million vehicles.

Investor criticism remained steadfast, however. Renault continued to be shat upon for having too much influence (and voting rights) in regard to Nissan, production quality was faulted as a reoccurring problem for the brand, and the current management lineup was bemoaned as weak while failing to help restore the company’s credibility with the public. Some investors even looked back wistfully at Ghosn’s management style, suggesting a dictatorial approach would be best.

“What you need now is top-down strong leadership. You shouldn’t just spend time on democratic discussion. We need dictatorship,” the shareholder said. “Ironically, when Mr. Ghosn arrived at Nissan, in five or six years, he made [recovery] a reality. That’s what Nissan needs.”

Uchida said he has now taken the reigns, and any failings or successes will fall squarely on his shoulders. Yet several problems remain out of his control. French influence persists and doesn’t seem to be making Japanese shareholders anything but annoyed, though it might be unreasonable to expect investor glee when times are this tough.

Prior to his daring escape from Japan, Ghosn predicted Nissan would be bankrupt by 2022 while chatting with defense attorney Nobuo Gohara. “He told me that Nissan will probably go bankrupt within two to three years,” said Gohara during a news conference. While that premonition comes without clarifications as to how, Nissan remains in a bad state, with implosion looking probable if the recovery plan fails. That said, we’ve seen automakers come back from the brink of death before — including Nissan.

[Image: FotograFFF/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
7 of 17 comments
  • Gasser Gasser on Jul 06, 2020

    As someone of a certain age, I, and my friends, bought these cars in the 1970s where they were Datsun. The quality was equal to whatever was around then (if not better than the big 3) and the Datsun name commanded list price. Maybe producing a quality product would go a long way toward increased sales and a savings in discounts. Why is this such a difficult concept to master in 2020??

    • Palumboism Palumboism on Jul 06, 2020

      It wasn't just quality. Datsuns always seemed more modern than other brands and look more appealing inside and outside. Compare a 1979 200SX to anything else on the road in 1979. It look a decade more modern on the inside and outside. The same could be said of the 1980 Datsun 810, which was renamed Maxima in 1981. My friends parents had a 1978 200SX and the dashboard looked futuristic to me at night. The difference between a 2020 Rogue and RAV4 in design and quality's embarrassing. I believe the 2021 Rogue's a huge improvement, but the damage to the brand image has been done. Most won't consider a Nissan. It's really sad to see how far this company has fallen. This is the same company that launched the 240Z and 510 in 1969. I want that company back.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 07, 2020

    SE-R all the things and at least go out with a bang.

    • See 3 previous
    • CoastieLenn CoastieLenn on Jul 08, 2020

      @Art Vandelay The Altima had the 3.5 as an option up until this current generation.

  • BEPLA My own theory/question on the Mark VI:Had Lincoln used the longer sedan wheelbase on the coupe - by leaning the windshield back and pushing the dashboard & steering wheel rearward a bit - not built a sedan - and engineered the car for frameless side windows (those framed windows are clunky, look cheap, and add too many vertical lines in comparison to the previous Marks) - Would the VI have remained an attractive, aspirational object of desire?
  • VoGhost Another ICEbox? Pass. Where are you going to fill your oil addiction when all the gas stations disappear for lack of demand? I want a pickup that I can actually use for a few decades.
  • Art Vandelay Best? PCH from Ventura to somewhere near Lompoc. Most Famous? Route Irish
  • GT Ross The black wheel fad cannot die soon enough for me.
  • Brett Woods My 4-Runner had a manual with the 4-cylinder. It was acceptable but not really fun. I have thought before that auto with a six cylinder would have been smoother, more comfortable, and need less maintenance. Ditto my 4 banger manual Japanese pick-up. Nowhere near as nice as a GM with auto and six cylinders that I tried a bit later. Drove with a U.S. buddy who got one of the first C8s. He said he didn't even consider a manual. There was an article about how fewer than ten percent of buyers optioned a manual in the U.S. when they were available. Visited my English cousin who lived in a hilly suburb and she had a manual Range Rover and said she never even considered an automatic. That's culture for you.  Miata, Boxster, Mustang, Corvette and Camaro; I only want manual but I can see both sides of the argument for a Mustang, Camaro or Challenger. Once you get past a certain size and weight, cruising with automatic is a better dynamic. A dual clutch automatic is smoother, faster, probably more reliable, and still allows you to select and hold a gear. When you get these vehicles with a high performance envelope, dual-clutch automatic is what brings home the numbers.