By on June 2, 2020


Slides from an Acura dealer webinar have leaked onto the Internet, and Acura fans, take note.

While almost anything on Reddit needs to be approached with a reasonably skeptical eye – do you really think all those posts on r/relationships are real? – there are a few news nuggets to mine here.

First of all, almost all the models in the lineup, save the RDX and NSX, appear to be getting a spicier Type-S trim. That’s no shock with the NSX, since that supercar is already hot enough, but it’s mildly surprising in terms of the RDX, given the relative sportiness of Acura’s crossovers. Especially since the other crossover, the MDX, will get the Type-S treatment.

So that means the TLX and MDX will get Type-S trims, along with the “New Compact Sedan”. The MDX and New Compact Sedan will follow the TLX in the launch order. The RDX and NSX aren’t listed before 2022.

Wait, what? No ILX?

Well, we don’t know. The lack of ILX nomenclature could mean a change in name, and speculation is rampant that the Integra name could return. That could revive interest in the brand – not everyone loves alphanumeric nomenclature. Then again, whatever problems Acura may or may not have probably run deeper than just the brand’s naming convention. Too many sedans and not enough crossovers, for one thing, could be an issue. Even with the RLX now pining for the fjords.

There’s still no crossover smaller than RDX or larger than MDX on offer, you’ll notice. The webinar can be seen here.

The ILX has been mostly an afterthought over its lifetime, even though the car once offered a base powertrain that including a manual. That particular car was a blast to drive, but not luxurious enough for the brand and not as dedicated to performance as the Integra and later, the RSX.

Update: Acura has responded. A PR man points out that ILX sales increased about 30 percent year-over-year from 2018 to 2019 (GoodCarBadCar backs this up) and that it has a 24.6 percent market share in its segment, a nearly 6 point gain. However, GCBC’s analysis of the ILX is as grim as what I wrote. So check out the numbers and decide for yourself. To me, the point here isn’t if the ILX is selling well or not. Rather, it’s about the planned replacement and how that could be a new Integra or RSX.

Either name could come back, or perhaps the ILX moniker will return after all. All we know is that there will be some sort of compact sedan bearing Acura badging with a Type-S option box to check.

As for the Type-S hi-po trims, here’s the background. The Type-S concept previewed the just-shown 2021 TLX, and the Type-S version is slated to have a 3.0-liter V6 that likely makes north of 300 horsepower, along with all-wheel drive.

This lineup overall will be complete by 2022. We’ve already seen the 2021 TLX, so we know that as Jerry Seinfeld once told an unfortunate immigrant restauranteur, wheels are in motion.

We don’t have specs or other details yet. We’ve reached out to Acura for comment but have not heard back by press time.

Stay tuned. With the Detroit and New York auto shows binned for this year and L.A. an uncertainty, it’s hard to predict when the covers may lift. Virtual reveals could happen, too, thanks to COVID-19.

Either way, the Acura lineup just got a lot spicier, at least on paper. And every Integra fanboy/fangirl just fainted.

Not to deepen the vapors, but what if the new compact, or at least a version of it, ends up being an Acura version of the beloved Honda Civic Type R?

Take a breath to collect yourself.

A lineup full of Type-S trims and a strong entry in the compact class could be just the booster shot the doctor ordered.

H/t to contributor Chris Tonn

[Image: Acura]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

18 Comments on “Type-S (Almost) All the Things: Acura’s 2022 Product Line Leaked [UPDATED]...”

  • avatar

    Acura ? The brand that single handedly squanders the engineering genius of Honda ? A bunch of marketers that looks hard at the BMW buyer then offers them something sorta close if you squint for just enought money less to make a sale ? Tape and Stripes only till I see an actual vehicle with a performance increase.

    Fire the useless Acura marketers, transfer the product to “Honda”, and let the engineers rip. Forget all about BMW…didja finally sell all those ZDX ?

    • 0 avatar

      Nothing we for Acura until it gets hand-me downs from Honda and GM battery platform partnership.

    • 0 avatar

      My 2004 TSX was something altogether different from a cut-rate BMW, and I’d like to see the brand make cars like it again. I don’t know if the TLX and “New Compact Sedan” will get there, but they are more promising than anything we’ve seen in a while.

    • 0 avatar

      oh, now, management squandered the engineers starting well over 20 years ago. That’s why we got the glass transmissions, then the engine-destroying cylinder deactivation, then the turbo engines that suck gasoline into the oil…and let’s not forget the Civic Hybrid’s bad battery, followed immediately by the “fix” that simply turned the battery use way down so it could last the warranty at the cost of more fuel use by the owner…

      Scott Adams himself couldn’t have made it up. I can see the Honda execs, demanding that the engineers do stupid stuff and then reacting only when everything is so broken they can’t ignore it. In the meantime the engineers are shaking their heads saying “I told you so…”

  • avatar

    No commends about Acura? Unbelievable, as if no one cares. I could imagine torrent of comments pouring in if it was about Kia, or Cadillac and that without DW, you could safely double number if it was with us. I enjoy reading comments to find out what article is about, it is too lengthy to read.

  • avatar

    For the record, the manual on the old ILX came with the 2.4. It was the upmarket option, not the base (which got a 2.0 and an automatic).

    And I don’t care what they call it, but I’d be interested in a mature version of the Type R.

  • avatar

    Say what you will about CUVs taking over the market, but at least Acura is trying to make theirs interesting. I give them (qualified) props.

  • avatar

    The ILX should have been given a real motor 5 – 10 years ago. Even comatose people got the (lack of) picture 2 – 3 years ago or much more.

    They had a motor(s) all this time. And yet they did nothing? So was it intentional that the ILX doesn’t appear now? Likely. Steer clear of this brand.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Oberkanone: If only they could design a new model no one will buy then supply problems will be eliminated.
  • Lou_BC: @lastwgn – that may be true for a full bling truck but I doubt a mid spec supercrew F150 would use more...
  • brn: Not to mention, they don’t do much good when covered with snow or in a garage. Also, what stops us from...
  • dukeisduke: Yep, two throttle bodies on a low-profile cross-ram manifold. GM didn’t have a large enough single...
  • Corey Lewis: Chrome stocks sent soaring.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber